From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <SRS0=Ynhu=3R=lists.ozlabs.org=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@kernel.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on
	aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,
	MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
	version=3.4.0
Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99])
	by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04934C2D0DB
	for <linuxppc-dev@archiver.kernel.org>; Tue, 28 Jan 2020 12:15:14 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7B14724681
	for <linuxppc-dev@archiver.kernel.org>; Tue, 28 Jan 2020 12:15:13 +0000 (UTC)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 7B14724681
Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com
Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org
Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3])
	by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 486QYC3s4nzDqLK
	for <linuxppc-dev@archiver.kernel.org>; Tue, 28 Jan 2020 23:15:11 +1100 (AEDT)
Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized)
 smtp.mailfrom=linux.ibm.com (client-ip=148.163.158.5;
 helo=mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com; envelope-from=rppt@linux.ibm.com;
 receiver=<UNKNOWN>)
Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org;
 dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com
Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com
 [148.163.158.5])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 486QVP5YLgzDqKZ
 for <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>; Tue, 28 Jan 2020 23:12:38 +1100 (AEDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0098413.ppops.net [127.0.0.1])
 by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id
 00SCCNm1016081
 for <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>; Tue, 28 Jan 2020 07:12:36 -0500
Received: from e06smtp07.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp07.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.103])
 by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2xtmmw06dx-1
 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT)
 for <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>; Tue, 28 Jan 2020 07:12:28 -0500
Received: from localhost
 by e06smtp07.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only!
 Violators will be prosecuted
 for <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org> from <rppt@linux.ibm.com>;
 Tue, 28 Jan 2020 12:10:12 -0000
Received: from b06cxnps3075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.109.195)
 by e06smtp07.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.137) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway:
 Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; 
 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256)
 Tue, 28 Jan 2020 12:10:02 -0000
Received: from d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com
 [9.149.105.61])
 by b06cxnps3075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id
 00SCA17u41681050
 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK);
 Tue, 28 Jan 2020 12:10:01 GMT
Received: from d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1])
 by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A00D11C04A;
 Tue, 28 Jan 2020 12:10:01 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1])
 by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B8F411C050;
 Tue, 28 Jan 2020 12:09:58 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from linux.ibm.com (unknown [9.148.59.112])
 by d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS;
 Tue, 28 Jan 2020 12:09:57 +0000 (GMT)
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2020 14:09:56 +0200
From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
To: Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V12] mm/debug: Add tests validating architecture page
 table helpers
References: <1580174873-18117-1-git-send-email-anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
 <14882A91-17DE-4ABD-ABF2-08E7CCEDF660@lca.pw>
 <214c0d53-eb34-9b0c-2e4e-1aa005146331@arm.com>
 <016A776F-EFD9-4D2B-A3A9-788008617D95@lca.pw>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <016A776F-EFD9-4D2B-A3A9-788008617D95@lca.pw>
X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00
x-cbid: 20012812-0028-0000-0000-000003D5276E
X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused
x-cbparentid: 20012812-0029-0000-0000-000024996EC2
Message-Id: <20200128120956.GB6363@linux.ibm.com>
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.138, 18.0.572
 definitions=2020-01-28_03:2020-01-24,
 2020-01-28 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0
 mlxlogscore=840
 impostorscore=0 phishscore=0 malwarescore=0 lowpriorityscore=0
 clxscore=1011 bulkscore=0 mlxscore=0 adultscore=0 spamscore=0
 priorityscore=1501 suspectscore=56 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx
 scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-1911200001 definitions=main-2001280099
X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List <linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.ozlabs.org/options/linuxppc-dev>,
 <mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@lists.ozlabs.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>
List-Help: <mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@lists.ozlabs.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev>,
 <mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@lists.ozlabs.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: Mark Rutland <Mark.Rutland@arm.com>, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org,
 linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
 James Hogan <jhogan@kernel.org>,
 Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp>,
 Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
 Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>, Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
 sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
 linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
 Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
 Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>, Steven Price <Steven.Price@arm.com>,
 Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>, Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@de.ibm.com>,
 linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
 Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
 Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>,
 Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>,
 Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>, "Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>,
 Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
 Sri Krishna chowdary <schowdary@nvidia.com>,
 Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
 Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
 Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org,
 Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
 Paul Burton <paul.burton@mips.com>, Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
 Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com>,
 Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>,
 Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
 "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org
Sender: "Linuxppc-dev"
 <linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org>

Hello Qian,

On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 10:33:08PM -0500, Qian Cai wrote:
> 
> > On Jan 27, 2020, at 10:06 PM, Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com> wrote:
> >
> > enablement of this test (for the moment) but then the goal is to integrate all
> > of them going forward. The test not only validates platform's adherence to the
> > expected semantics from generic MM but also helps in keeping it that way during
> > code changes in future as well.
> 
> Another option maybe to get some decent arches on board first before merging this
> thing, so it have more changes to catch regressions for developers who might run this. 

Aren't x86 and arm64 not decent enough?
Even if this test could be used to detect regressions only on these two
platforms, the test is valuable.
 

-- 
Sincerely yours,
Mike.