From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.3 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07E0AC2D0B1 for ; Tue, 4 Feb 2020 09:28:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6B8AE2166E for ; Tue, 4 Feb 2020 09:28:15 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 6B8AE2166E Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=suse.de Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48BfWH6rxgzDqP6 for ; Tue, 4 Feb 2020 20:28:11 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=suse.de (client-ip=195.135.220.15; helo=mx2.suse.de; envelope-from=osalvador@suse.de; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=suse.de Received: from mx2.suse.de (mx2.suse.de [195.135.220.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48BfTL5c7fzDqJY for ; Tue, 4 Feb 2020 20:26:30 +1100 (AEDT) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.220.254]) by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 195CDAC2C; Tue, 4 Feb 2020 09:26:25 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2020 10:26:23 +0100 From: Oscar Salvador To: David Hildenbrand Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 09/10] mm/memory_hotplug: Drop local variables in shrink_zone_span() Message-ID: <20200204092623.GD6494@linux> References: <20191006085646.5768-1-david@redhat.com> <20191006085646.5768-10-david@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20191006085646.5768-10-david@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, Michal Hocko , linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, Pavel Tatashin , linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Wei Yang , Andrew Morton , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Dan Williams , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On Sun, Oct 06, 2019 at 10:56:45AM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote: > Get rid of the unnecessary local variables. > > Cc: Andrew Morton > Cc: Oscar Salvador > Cc: David Hildenbrand > Cc: Michal Hocko > Cc: Pavel Tatashin > Cc: Dan Williams > Cc: Wei Yang > Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand > --- > mm/memory_hotplug.c | 15 ++++++--------- > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/mm/memory_hotplug.c b/mm/memory_hotplug.c > index 8dafa1ba8d9f..843481bd507d 100644 > --- a/mm/memory_hotplug.c > +++ b/mm/memory_hotplug.c > @@ -374,14 +374,11 @@ static unsigned long find_biggest_section_pfn(int nid, struct zone *zone, > static void shrink_zone_span(struct zone *zone, unsigned long start_pfn, > unsigned long end_pfn) > { > - unsigned long zone_start_pfn = zone->zone_start_pfn; > - unsigned long z = zone_end_pfn(zone); /* zone_end_pfn namespace clash */ > - unsigned long zone_end_pfn = z; > unsigned long pfn; > int nid = zone_to_nid(zone); We could also remove the nid, right? AFAICS, the nid is only used in find_{smallest/biggest}_section_pfn so we could place there as well. Anyway, nothing to nit-pick about: Reviewed-by: Oscar Salvador > > zone_span_writelock(zone); > - if (zone_start_pfn == start_pfn) { > + if (zone->zone_start_pfn == start_pfn) { > /* > * If the section is smallest section in the zone, it need > * shrink zone->zone_start_pfn and zone->zone_spanned_pages. > @@ -389,25 +386,25 @@ static void shrink_zone_span(struct zone *zone, unsigned long start_pfn, > * for shrinking zone. > */ > pfn = find_smallest_section_pfn(nid, zone, end_pfn, > - zone_end_pfn); > + zone_end_pfn(zone)); > if (pfn) { > + zone->spanned_pages = zone_end_pfn(zone) - pfn; > zone->zone_start_pfn = pfn; > - zone->spanned_pages = zone_end_pfn - pfn; > } else { > zone->zone_start_pfn = 0; > zone->spanned_pages = 0; > } > - } else if (zone_end_pfn == end_pfn) { > + } else if (zone_end_pfn(zone) == end_pfn) { > /* > * If the section is biggest section in the zone, it need > * shrink zone->spanned_pages. > * In this case, we find second biggest valid mem_section for > * shrinking zone. > */ > - pfn = find_biggest_section_pfn(nid, zone, zone_start_pfn, > + pfn = find_biggest_section_pfn(nid, zone, zone->zone_start_pfn, > start_pfn); > if (pfn) > - zone->spanned_pages = pfn - zone_start_pfn + 1; > + zone->spanned_pages = pfn - zone->zone_start_pfn + 1; > else { > zone->zone_start_pfn = 0; > zone->spanned_pages = 0; > -- > 2.21.0 > -- Oscar Salvador SUSE L3