From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6755EC2D0B1 for ; Tue, 4 Feb 2020 09:53:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 273A92087E for ; Tue, 4 Feb 2020 09:53:05 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 273A92087E Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=suse.de Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48Bg3w4mpbzDqNd for ; Tue, 4 Feb 2020 20:53:00 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=suse.de (client-ip=195.135.220.15; helo=mx2.suse.de; envelope-from=osalvador@suse.de; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=suse.de Received: from mx2.suse.de (mx2.suse.de [195.135.220.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48Bg206m0LzDqCY for ; Tue, 4 Feb 2020 20:51:20 +1100 (AEDT) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.220.254]) by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5EF4AFF6; Tue, 4 Feb 2020 09:51:16 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2020 10:51:10 +0100 From: Oscar Salvador To: David Hildenbrand Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 00/10] mm/memory_hotplug: Shrink zones before removing memory Message-ID: <20200204095110.GF6494@linux> References: <20191006085646.5768-1-david@redhat.com> <20191203133633.GA2600@linux> <20200130204043.29e21049775e3a637db733e0@linux-foundation.org> <20200203174653.74630ef5744c68be55374b0d@linux-foundation.org> <78545b80-ea30-0d44-acb8-364312ae9595@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <78545b80-ea30-0d44-acb8-364312ae9595@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Mark Rutland , Pankaj Gupta , Michal Hocko , linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra , Catalin Marinas , Dave Hansen , Heiko Carstens , Wei Yang , linux-mm@kvack.org, Pavel Tatashin , Rich Felker , Alexander Potapenko , "H. Peter Anvin" , Alexander Duyck , Ira Weiny , Thomas Gleixner , Qian Cai , linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, Yu Zhao , Yoshinori Sato , Jason Gunthorpe , "Aneesh Kumar K . V" , x86@kernel.org, "Matthew Wilcox \(Oracle\)" , Mike Rapoport , Halil Pasic , Christian Borntraeger , Ingo Molnar , Gerald Schaefer , Wei Yang , Fenghua Yu , Pavel Tatashin , Vasily Gorbik , Anshuman Khandual , Vlastimil Babka , Will Deacon , Robin Murphy , Jun Yao , Borislav Petkov , Andy Lutomirski , Dan Williams , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Tony Luck , Mel Gorman , Masahiro Yamada , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Steve Capper , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Logan Gunthorpe , Tom Lendacky , Paul Mackerras , Andrew Morton , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On Tue, Feb 04, 2020 at 09:45:24AM +0100, David Hildenbrand wrote: > I really hope we'll find more reviewers in general - I'm also not happy > if my patches go upstream with little/no review. However, patches > shouldn't be stuck for multiple merge windows in linux-next IMHO > (excluding exceptions of course) - then they should either be sent > upstream (and eventually fixed later) or dropped. First of all sorry for my lack of review, as lately I have been a bit disconnected of the list because lack of time. Lucky my I managed to find some time, so I went through the patches that did lack review (#6-#10). I hope this helps in moving forward the series, although Michal's review would be great as well. -- Oscar Salvador SUSE L3