linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
To: Christopher Lameter <cl@linux.com>
Cc: Sachin Sant <sachinp@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>,
	Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@virtuozzo.com>,
	Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [5.6.0-rc2-next-20200218/powerpc] Boot failure on POWER9
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2020 19:41:52 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200226184152.GQ3771@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.21.2002261823270.8012@www.lameter.com>

On Wed 26-02-20 18:25:28, Cristopher Lameter wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Feb 2020, Michal Hocko wrote:
> 
> > Hmm, nasty. Is there any reason why kmalloc_node behaves differently
> > from the page allocator?
> 
> The page allocator will do the same thing if you pass GFP_THISNODE and
> insist on allocating memory from a node that does not exist.

I do not think that the page allocator would blow up even with
GFP_THISNODE. The allocation would just fail on memory less node.

Besides that kmalloc_node shouldn't really have an implicit GFP_THISNODE
semantic right? At least I do not see anything like that documented
anywhere.

-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs

  reply	other threads:[~2020-02-26 18:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-02-18 10:45 [5.6.0-rc2-next-20200218/powerpc] Boot failure on POWER9 Sachin Sant
2020-02-18 10:50 ` Kirill Tkhai
2020-02-18 11:01   ` Kirill Tkhai
2020-02-18 11:35     ` Kirill Tkhai
2020-02-18 11:40     ` Sachin Sant
2020-02-18 11:55       ` Michal Hocko
2020-02-18 14:00         ` Sachin Sant
2020-02-18 14:26           ` Michal Hocko
2020-02-18 15:11             ` Sachin Sant
2020-02-18 15:24               ` Michal Hocko
2020-02-22  3:38                 ` Christopher Lameter
2020-02-24  8:58                   ` Michal Hocko
2020-02-26 18:25                     ` Christopher Lameter
2020-02-26 18:41                       ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2020-02-26 18:44                         ` Christopher Lameter
2020-02-26 19:01                           ` Michal Hocko
2020-02-26 20:31                             ` David Rientjes
2020-02-26 20:52                               ` Michal Hocko
2020-02-26 21:45                         ` Vlastimil Babka
2020-02-26 22:29                           ` Vlastimil Babka
2020-02-27 12:12                             ` Michal Hocko
2020-02-27 16:00                               ` Sachin Sant
2020-02-27 16:16                                 ` Vlastimil Babka
2020-02-27 18:26                                   ` Michal Hocko
2020-03-10 15:01                                     ` Michal Hocko
2020-03-12 12:18                                       ` Michael Ellerman
2020-03-12 16:51                                         ` Sachin Sant
2020-03-13 10:48                                           ` Michael Ellerman
2020-03-13 11:12                                             ` Srikar Dronamraju
2020-03-13 11:35                                               ` Vlastimil Babka
2020-03-14  8:10                                                 ` Sachin Sant
2020-02-27 12:02                           ` Michal Hocko
2020-02-18 11:38   ` Sachin Sant
2020-02-18 11:53     ` Kirill Tkhai
2020-03-17 13:17 ` [PATCH 0/4] Fix kmalloc_node on offline nodes Srikar Dronamraju
2020-03-17 13:17   ` [PATCH 1/4] mm: Check for node_online in node_present_pages Srikar Dronamraju
2020-03-17 13:37     ` Srikar Dronamraju
2020-03-17 13:17   ` [PATCH 2/4] mm/slub: Use mem_node to allocate a new slab Srikar Dronamraju
2020-03-17 13:34     ` Vlastimil Babka
2020-03-17 13:45       ` Srikar Dronamraju
2020-03-17 13:53         ` Vlastimil Babka
2020-03-17 14:51           ` Srikar Dronamraju
2020-03-17 15:29             ` Vlastimil Babka
2020-03-18  7:29               ` Srikar Dronamraju
2020-03-17 16:41       ` Srikar Dronamraju
2020-03-17 13:17   ` [PATCH 3/4] mm: Implement reset_numa_mem Srikar Dronamraju
2020-03-17 13:17   ` [PATCH 4/4] powerpc/numa: Set fallback nodes for offline nodes Srikar Dronamraju
2020-03-17 14:22     ` Bharata B Rao
2020-03-17 14:29       ` Srikar Dronamraju

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200226184152.GQ3771@dhcp22.suse.cz \
    --to=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=cl@linux.com \
    --cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
    --cc=ktkhai@virtuozzo.com \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=penberg@kernel.org \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=sachinp@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).