From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <SRS0=5PiN=6Z=lists.ozlabs.org=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@kernel.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on
	aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,
	MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0
Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99])
	by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7910DC47255
	for <linuxppc-dev@archiver.kernel.org>; Mon, 11 May 2020 15:15:30 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 30701206D5
	for <linuxppc-dev@archiver.kernel.org>; Mon, 11 May 2020 15:15:30 +0000 (UTC)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 30701206D5
Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=lst.de
Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org
Received: from bilbo.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3])
	by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49LPdD08nnzDqPN
	for <linuxppc-dev@archiver.kernel.org>; Tue, 12 May 2020 01:15:28 +1000 (AEST)
Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org;
 spf=none (no SPF record) smtp.mailfrom=lst.de
 (client-ip=213.95.11.211; helo=verein.lst.de; envelope-from=hch@lst.de;
 receiver=<UNKNOWN>)
Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org;
 dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=lst.de
Received: from verein.lst.de (verein.lst.de [213.95.11.211])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49LPXf11qWzDr5n
 for <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>; Tue, 12 May 2020 01:11:29 +1000 (AEST)
Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407)
 id 2865568BFE; Mon, 11 May 2020 17:11:21 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Mon, 11 May 2020 17:11:20 +0200
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 31/31] module: move the set_fs hack for
 flush_icache_range to m68k
Message-ID: <20200511151120.GA28634@lst.de>
References: <20200510075510.987823-1-hch@lst.de>
 <20200510075510.987823-32-hch@lst.de>
 <CAMuHMdU_OxNoKfO=i903kx0mgk0-i2h4u2ase3m9_dn6oFh_5g@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAMuHMdU_OxNoKfO=i903kx0mgk0-i2h4u2ase3m9_dn6oFh_5g@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01)
X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List <linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.ozlabs.org/options/linuxppc-dev>,
 <mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@lists.ozlabs.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>
List-Help: <mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@lists.ozlabs.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev>,
 <mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@lists.ozlabs.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: "linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org" <linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org>,
 Linux-sh list <linux-sh@vger.kernel.org>, Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org>,
 "open list:BROADCOM NVRAM DRIVER" <linux-mips@vger.kernel.org>,
 Linux MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>, sparclinux <sparclinux@vger.kernel.org>,
 linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
 Linux-Arch <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>, linux-c6x-dev@linux-c6x.org,
 "open list:QUALCOMM HEXAGON..." <linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org>,
 the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@kernel.org>,
 "open list:TENSILICA XTENSA PORT \(xtensa\)" <linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org>,
 Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Jessica Yu <jeyu@kernel.org>,
 linux-um <linux-um@lists.infradead.org>,
 linux-m68k <linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org>,
 Openrisc <openrisc@lists.librecores.org>,
 Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
 Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu>,
 Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
 alpha <linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org>,
 Linux FS Devel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
 Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
 linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>
Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org
Sender: "Linuxppc-dev"
 <linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org>

On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 09:40:39AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Sun, May 10, 2020 at 9:57 AM Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> wrote:
> >
> > flush_icache_range generally operates on kernel addresses, but for some
> > reason m68k needed a set_fs override.  Move that into the m68k code
> > insted of keeping it in the module loader.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> 
> Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
> Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>

Btw, do you know what part of flush_icache_range relied on set_fs?
Do any of the m68k maintainers have an idea how to handle that in
a nicer way when we can split the implementations?