From: Gautham R Shenoy <ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Nathan Lynch <nathanl@linux.ibm.com>,
Gautham R Shenoy <ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Oliver OHalloran <oliveroh@au1.ibm.com>,
Michael Neuling <mikey@linux.ibm.com>,
Michael Ellerman <michaele@au1.ibm.com>,
Anton Blanchard <anton@au1.ibm.com>,
linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@au1.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/11] Powerpc/smp: Create coregroup domain
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2020 13:49:26 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200717081926.GD32531@in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200714043624.5648-10-srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 10:06:22AM +0530, Srikar Dronamraju wrote:
> Add percpu coregroup maps and masks to create coregroup domain.
> If a coregroup doesn't exist, the coregroup domain will be degenerated
> in favour of SMT/CACHE domain.
>
> Cc: linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>
> Cc: Michael Ellerman <michaele@au1.ibm.com>
> Cc: Nick Piggin <npiggin@au1.ibm.com>
> Cc: Oliver OHalloran <oliveroh@au1.ibm.com>
> Cc: Nathan Lynch <nathanl@linux.ibm.com>
> Cc: Michael Neuling <mikey@linux.ibm.com>
> Cc: Anton Blanchard <anton@au1.ibm.com>
> Cc: Gautham R Shenoy <ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Cc: Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@linux.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
> arch/powerpc/include/asm/topology.h | 10 ++++++++
> arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c | 5 ++++
> 3 files changed, 52 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/topology.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/topology.h
> index 2db7ba789720..34812c35018e 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/topology.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/topology.h
> @@ -98,6 +98,7 @@ extern int stop_topology_update(void);
> extern int prrn_is_enabled(void);
> extern int find_and_online_cpu_nid(int cpu);
> extern int timed_topology_update(int nsecs);
> +extern int cpu_to_coregroup_id(int cpu);
> #else
> static inline int start_topology_update(void)
> {
> @@ -120,6 +121,15 @@ static inline int timed_topology_update(int nsecs)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static inline int cpu_to_coregroup_id(int cpu)
> +{
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> + return cpu_to_core_id(cpu);
> +#else
> + return 0;
> +#endif
> +}
> +
> #endif /* CONFIG_NUMA && CONFIG_PPC_SPLPAR */
>
> #include <asm-generic/topology.h>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c
> index ef19eeccd21e..bb25c13bbb79 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c
> @@ -80,6 +80,7 @@ DEFINE_PER_CPU(cpumask_var_t, cpu_sibling_map);
> DEFINE_PER_CPU(cpumask_var_t, cpu_smallcore_map);
> DEFINE_PER_CPU(cpumask_var_t, cpu_l2_cache_map);
> DEFINE_PER_CPU(cpumask_var_t, cpu_core_map);
> +DEFINE_PER_CPU(cpumask_var_t, cpu_coregroup_map);
>
> EXPORT_PER_CPU_SYMBOL(cpu_sibling_map);
> EXPORT_PER_CPU_SYMBOL(cpu_l2_cache_map);
> @@ -91,6 +92,7 @@ enum {
> smt_idx,
> #endif
> bigcore_idx,
> + mc_idx,
> die_idx,
> };
>
> @@ -869,6 +871,21 @@ static const struct cpumask *smallcore_smt_mask(int cpu)
> }
> #endif
>
> +static struct cpumask *cpu_coregroup_mask(int cpu)
> +{
> + return per_cpu(cpu_coregroup_map, cpu);
> +}
> +
> +static bool has_coregroup_support(void)
> +{
> + return coregroup_enabled;
> +}
> +
> +static const struct cpumask *cpu_mc_mask(int cpu)
> +{
> + return cpu_coregroup_mask(cpu);
> +}
> +
> static const struct cpumask *cpu_bigcore_mask(int cpu)
> {
> return cpu_core_mask(cpu);
> @@ -879,6 +896,7 @@ static struct sched_domain_topology_level powerpc_topology[] = {
> { cpu_smt_mask, powerpc_smt_flags, SD_INIT_NAME(SMT) },
> #endif
> { cpu_bigcore_mask, SD_INIT_NAME(BIGCORE) },
> + { cpu_mc_mask, SD_INIT_NAME(MC) },
> { cpu_cpu_mask, SD_INIT_NAME(DIE) },
> { NULL, },
> };
> @@ -933,6 +951,10 @@ void __init smp_prepare_cpus(unsigned int max_cpus)
> GFP_KERNEL, node);
> zalloc_cpumask_var_node(&per_cpu(cpu_core_map, cpu),
> GFP_KERNEL, node);
> + if (has_coregroup_support())
> + zalloc_cpumask_var_node(&per_cpu(cpu_coregroup_map, cpu),
> + GFP_KERNEL, node);
> +
> #ifdef CONFIG_NEED_MULTIPLE_NODES
> /*
> * numa_node_id() works after this.
> @@ -950,6 +972,11 @@ void __init smp_prepare_cpus(unsigned int max_cpus)
> cpumask_set_cpu(boot_cpuid, cpu_l2_cache_mask(boot_cpuid));
> cpumask_set_cpu(boot_cpuid, cpu_core_mask(boot_cpuid));
>
> + if (has_coregroup_support())
> + cpumask_set_cpu(boot_cpuid, cpu_coregroup_mask(boot_cpuid));
> + else
> + powerpc_topology[mc_idx].mask = cpu_bigcore_mask;
> +
The else part could be moved to the common function where we are
modifying the other attributes of the topology array.
> init_big_cores();
> if (has_big_cores) {
> cpumask_set_cpu(boot_cpuid,
> @@ -1241,6 +1268,8 @@ static void remove_cpu_from_masks(int cpu)
> set_cpus_unrelated(cpu, i, cpu_sibling_mask);
> if (has_big_cores)
> set_cpus_unrelated(cpu, i, cpu_smallcore_mask);
> + if (has_coregroup_support())
> + set_cpus_unrelated(cpu, i, cpu_coregroup_mask);
> }
> }
> #endif
> @@ -1301,6 +1330,14 @@ static void add_cpu_to_masks(int cpu)
> add_cpu_to_smallcore_masks(cpu);
> update_mask_by_l2(cpu, cpu_l2_cache_mask);
>
> + if (has_coregroup_support()) {
> + cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, cpu_coregroup_mask(cpu));
> + for_each_cpu(i, cpu_online_mask) {
> + if (cpu_to_coregroup_id(cpu) == cpu_to_coregroup_id(i))
> + set_cpus_related(cpu, i, cpu_coregroup_mask);
> + }
> + }
> +
> if (pkg_id == -1) {
> struct cpumask *(*mask)(int) = cpu_sibling_mask;
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c b/arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c
> index a43eab455be4..d9ab9da85eab 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c
> @@ -1695,6 +1695,11 @@ static const struct proc_ops topology_proc_ops = {
> .proc_release = single_release,
> };
>
> +int cpu_to_coregroup_id(int cpu)
> +{
> + return cpu_to_core_id(cpu);
> +}
So, if has_coregroup_support() returns true, then since the core_group
identification is currently done through the core-id, the
coregroup_mask is going to be the same as the
cpu_core_mask/cpu_cpu_mask. Thus, we will be degenerating the DIE
domain. Right ? Instead we could have kept the core-group to be a
single bigcore by default, so that those domains can get degenerated
preserving the legacy SMT, DIE, NUMA hierarchy.
> +
> static int topology_update_init(void)
> {
> start_topology_update();
> --
> 2.17.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-17 8:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-07-14 4:36 [PATCH 00/11] Support for grouping cores Srikar Dronamraju
2020-07-14 4:36 ` [PATCH 01/11] powerpc/smp: Cache node for reuse Srikar Dronamraju
2020-07-17 4:51 ` Gautham R Shenoy
2020-07-14 4:36 ` [PATCH 02/11] powerpc/smp: Merge Power9 topology with Power topology Srikar Dronamraju
2020-07-17 5:44 ` Gautham R Shenoy
2020-07-20 8:10 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2020-07-14 4:36 ` [PATCH 03/11] powerpc/smp: Move powerpc_topology above Srikar Dronamraju
2020-07-17 5:45 ` Gautham R Shenoy
2020-07-14 4:36 ` [PATCH 04/11] powerpc/smp: Enable small core scheduling sooner Srikar Dronamraju
2020-07-17 5:48 ` Gautham R Shenoy
2020-07-20 7:20 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2020-07-20 7:47 ` Jordan Niethe
2020-07-20 8:52 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2020-07-14 4:36 ` [PATCH 05/11] powerpc/smp: Dont assume l2-cache to be superset of sibling Srikar Dronamraju
2020-07-14 5:40 ` Oliver O'Halloran
2020-07-14 6:30 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2020-07-17 6:00 ` Gautham R Shenoy
2020-07-20 6:45 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2020-07-20 8:58 ` Gautham R Shenoy
2020-07-14 4:36 ` [PATCH 06/11] powerpc/smp: Generalize 2nd sched domain Srikar Dronamraju
2020-07-17 6:37 ` Gautham R Shenoy
2020-07-20 6:19 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2020-07-20 9:07 ` Gautham R Shenoy
2020-07-14 4:36 ` [PATCH 07/11] Powerpc/numa: Detect support for coregroup Srikar Dronamraju
2020-07-17 8:08 ` Gautham R Shenoy
2020-07-20 13:56 ` Michael Ellerman
2020-07-21 2:57 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2020-07-14 4:36 ` [PATCH 08/11] powerpc/smp: Allocate cpumask only after searching thread group Srikar Dronamraju
2020-07-17 8:08 ` Gautham R Shenoy
2020-07-14 4:36 ` [PATCH 09/11] Powerpc/smp: Create coregroup domain Srikar Dronamraju
2020-07-17 8:19 ` Gautham R Shenoy [this message]
2020-07-17 8:23 ` Gautham R Shenoy
2020-07-20 6:02 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2020-07-14 4:36 ` [PATCH 10/11] powerpc/smp: Implement cpu_to_coregroup_id Srikar Dronamraju
2020-07-17 8:26 ` Gautham R Shenoy
2020-07-20 5:48 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2020-07-20 9:10 ` Gautham R Shenoy
2020-07-20 10:26 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2020-07-14 4:36 ` [PATCH 11/11] powerpc/smp: Provide an ability to disable coregroup Srikar Dronamraju
2020-07-17 8:28 ` Gautham R Shenoy
2020-07-20 13:57 ` Michael Ellerman
2020-07-14 5:06 ` [PATCH 00/11] Support for grouping cores Srikar Dronamraju
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200717081926.GD32531@in.ibm.com \
--to=ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=anton@au1.ibm.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=michaele@au1.ibm.com \
--cc=mikey@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=nathanl@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=npiggin@au1.ibm.com \
--cc=oliveroh@au1.ibm.com \
--cc=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).