From: Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com>
To: Bharata B Rao <bharata@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: ldufour@linux.ibm.com, cclaudio@linux.ibm.com,
kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org, sathnaga@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com, sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, bauerman@linux.ibm.com,
david@gibson.dropbear.id.au
Subject: Re: [v4 3/5] KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: in H_SVM_INIT_DONE, migrate remaining normal-GFNs to secure-GFNs.
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2020 04:39:18 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200723113918.GB5493@oc0525413822.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200723061037.GA1082478@in.ibm.com>
On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 11:40:37AM +0530, Bharata B Rao wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 01:00:25AM -0700, Ram Pai wrote:
> >
> > +int kvmppc_uv_migrate_mem_slot(struct kvm *kvm,
> > + const struct kvm_memory_slot *memslot)
>
> Don't see any callers for this outside of this file, so why not static?
>
> > +{
> > + unsigned long gfn = memslot->base_gfn;
> > + struct vm_area_struct *vma;
> > + unsigned long start, end;
> > + int ret = 0;
> > +
> > + while (kvmppc_next_nontransitioned_gfn(memslot, kvm, &gfn)) {
>
> So you checked the state of gfn under uvmem_lock above, but release
> it too.
>
> > +
> > + mmap_read_lock(kvm->mm);
> > + start = gfn_to_hva(kvm, gfn);
> > + if (kvm_is_error_hva(start)) {
> > + ret = H_STATE;
> > + goto next;
> > + }
> > +
> > + end = start + (1UL << PAGE_SHIFT);
> > + vma = find_vma_intersection(kvm->mm, start, end);
> > + if (!vma || vma->vm_start > start || vma->vm_end < end) {
> > + ret = H_STATE;
> > + goto next;
> > + }
> > +
> > + mutex_lock(&kvm->arch.uvmem_lock);
> > + ret = kvmppc_svm_migrate_page(vma, start, end,
> > + (gfn << PAGE_SHIFT), kvm, PAGE_SHIFT, false);
>
> What is the guarantee that the gfn is in the same earlier state when you do
> do migration here?
Are you worried about the case, where someother thread will sneak-in and
migrate the GFN, and this migration request will become a duplicate one?
That is theortically possible, though practically improbable. This
transition is attempted only when there is one vcpu active in the VM.
However, may be, we should not bake-in that assumption in this code.
Will remove that assumption.
RP
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-23 11:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-07-17 8:00 [v4 0/5] Migrate non-migrated pages of a SVM Ram Pai
2020-07-17 8:00 ` [v4 1/5] KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: Disable page merging in H_SVM_INIT_START Ram Pai
2020-07-22 8:52 ` Bharata B Rao
2020-07-17 8:00 ` [v4 2/5] KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: track the state GFNs associated with secure VMs Ram Pai
2020-07-23 4:48 ` Bharata B Rao
2020-07-23 11:14 ` Ram Pai
2020-07-17 8:00 ` [v4 3/5] KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: in H_SVM_INIT_DONE, migrate remaining normal-GFNs to secure-GFNs Ram Pai
2020-07-23 6:10 ` Bharata B Rao
2020-07-23 11:39 ` Ram Pai [this message]
2020-07-17 8:00 ` [v4 4/5] KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: retry page migration before erroring-out Ram Pai
2020-07-23 6:13 ` Bharata B Rao
2020-07-23 11:44 ` Ram Pai
2020-07-17 8:00 ` [v4 5/5] KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: migrate hot plugged memory Ram Pai
2020-07-22 10:01 ` Bharata B Rao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200723113918.GB5493@oc0525413822.ibm.com \
--to=linuxram@us.ibm.com \
--cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=bauerman@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=bharata@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=cclaudio@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
--cc=kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ldufour@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=sathnaga@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).