linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] lockdep: improve current->(hard|soft)irqs_enabled synchronisation with actual irq state
Date: Sat, 25 Jul 2020 22:26:17 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200725202617.GI10769@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200723105615.1268126-1-npiggin@gmail.com>

On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 08:56:14PM +1000, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/hw_irq.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/hw_irq.h
> index 3a0db7b0b46e..35060be09073 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/hw_irq.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/hw_irq.h
> @@ -200,17 +200,14 @@ static inline bool arch_irqs_disabled(void)
>  #define powerpc_local_irq_pmu_save(flags)			\
>  	 do {							\
>  		raw_local_irq_pmu_save(flags);			\
> -		trace_hardirqs_off();				\
> +		if (!raw_irqs_disabled_flags(flags))		\
> +			trace_hardirqs_off();			\
>  	} while(0)

So one problem with the above is something like this:

	raw_local_irq_save();
	<NMI>
	  powerpc_local_irq_pmu_save();

that would now no longer call into tracing/lockdep at all. As a
consequence, lockdep and tracing would show the NMI ran with IRQs
enabled, which is exceptionally weird..

Similar problem with:

	raw_local_irq_disable();
	local_irq_save()

Now, most architectures today seem to do what x86 also did:

	<NMI>
	  trace_hardirqs_off()
	  ...
	  if (irqs_unmasked(regs))
	    trace_hardirqs_on()
	</NMI>

Which is 'funny' when it interleaves like:

	local_irq_disable();
	...
	local_irq_enable()
	  trace_hardirqs_on();
	  <NMI/>
	  raw_local_irq_enable();

Because then it will undo the trace_hardirqs_on() we just did. With the
result that both tracing and lockdep will see a hardirqs-disable without
a matching enable, while the hardware state is enabled.

Which is exactly the state Alexey seems to have ran into.

Now, x86, and at least arm64 call nmi_enter() before
trace_hardirqs_off(), but AFAICT Power never did that, and that's part
of the problem. nmi_enter() does lockdep_off() and that _used_ to also
kill IRQ tracking.

Now, my patch changed that, it makes IRQ tracking not respect
lockdep_off(). And that exposed x86 (and everybody else :/) to the same
problem you have.

And this is why I made x86 look at software state in NMIs. Because then
it all works out. For bonus points, trace_hardirqs_*() also has some
do-it-once logic for tracing.



Anyway, it's Saturday evening, time for a beer. I'll stare at this more
later.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-07-25 20:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-07-23 10:56 [PATCH 1/2] lockdep: improve current->(hard|soft)irqs_enabled synchronisation with actual irq state Nicholas Piggin
2020-07-23 10:56 ` [PATCH 2/2] lockdep: warn on redundant or incorrect irq state changes Nicholas Piggin
2020-07-24  2:57   ` kernel test robot
2020-08-04 10:00   ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2020-07-23 11:40 ` [PATCH 1/2] lockdep: improve current->(hard|soft)irqs_enabled synchronisation with actual irq state Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-23 13:11   ` Nicholas Piggin
2020-07-23 14:59     ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-23 16:20       ` Nicholas Piggin
2020-07-24  4:16     ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2020-07-24  5:59       ` Nicholas Piggin
2020-07-26  7:40         ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2020-07-24  6:16       ` Athira Rajeev
2020-07-24  2:19 ` kernel test robot
2020-07-24  3:15 ` kernel test robot
2020-07-25 20:26 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2020-07-26  4:14   ` Nicholas Piggin
2020-07-26 11:59     ` peterz
2020-07-26 12:11     ` peterz
2020-07-28 11:22       ` Nicholas Piggin
2020-08-07 11:11 ` peterz
2020-08-12  8:18   ` Nicholas Piggin
2020-08-12 10:35     ` peterz
2020-08-18  7:22       ` Nicholas Piggin
2020-08-18 15:41         ` peterz
2020-08-18 23:54           ` Nicholas Piggin
2020-08-19 10:39             ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2020-08-19 15:32               ` peterz
2020-08-19 15:39                 ` peterz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200725202617.GI10769@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=aik@ozlabs.ru \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).