LinuxPPC-Dev Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / Atom feed
From: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
To: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Stafford Horne <shorne@gmail.com>,
	Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
	linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-c6x-dev@linux-c6x.org,
	Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>,
	x86@kernel.org, Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>,
	clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	uclinux-h8-devel@lists.sourceforge.jp,
	linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org, openrisc@lists.librecores.org,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 14/15] x86/numa: remove redundant iteration over memblock.reserved
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2020 19:02:54 +0800
Message-ID: <20200728110254.GA14854@MiWiFi-R3L-srv> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200728051153.1590-15-rppt@kernel.org>

On 07/28/20 at 08:11am, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
> 
> numa_clear_kernel_node_hotplug() function first traverses numa_meminfo
> regions to set node ID in memblock.reserved and than traverses
> memblock.reserved to update reserved_nodemask to include node IDs that were
> set in the first loop.
> 
> Remove redundant traversal over memblock.reserved and update
> reserved_nodemask while iterating over numa_meminfo.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/mm/numa.c | 26 ++++++++++----------------
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/numa.c b/arch/x86/mm/numa.c
> index 8ee952038c80..4078abd33938 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/mm/numa.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/numa.c
> @@ -498,31 +498,25 @@ static void __init numa_clear_kernel_node_hotplug(void)
>  	 * and use those ranges to set the nid in memblock.reserved.
>  	 * This will split up the memblock regions along node
>  	 * boundaries and will set the node IDs as well.
> +	 *
> +	 * The nid will also be set in reserved_nodemask which is later
> +	 * used to clear MEMBLOCK_HOTPLUG flag.
> +	 *
> +	 * [ Note, when booting with mem=nn[kMG] or in a kdump kernel,
> +	 *   numa_meminfo might not include all memblock.reserved
> +	 *   memory ranges, because quirks such as trim_snb_memory()
> +	 *   reserve specific pages for Sandy Bridge graphics.
> +	 *   These ranges will remain with nid == MAX_NUMNODES. ]
>  	 */
>  	for (i = 0; i < numa_meminfo.nr_blks; i++) {
>  		struct numa_memblk *mb = numa_meminfo.blk + i;
>  		int ret;
>  
>  		ret = memblock_set_node(mb->start, mb->end - mb->start, &memblock.reserved, mb->nid);
> +		node_set(mb->nid, reserved_nodemask);

Really? This will set all node id into reserved_nodemask. But in the
current code, it's setting nid into memblock reserved region which
interleaves with numa_memoinfo, then get those nid and set it in
reserved_nodemask. This is so different, with my understanding. Please
correct me if I am wrong.

Thanks
Baoquan

>  		WARN_ON_ONCE(ret);
>  	}
>  
> -	/*
> -	 * Now go over all reserved memblock regions, to construct a
> -	 * node mask of all kernel reserved memory areas.
> -	 *
> -	 * [ Note, when booting with mem=nn[kMG] or in a kdump kernel,
> -	 *   numa_meminfo might not include all memblock.reserved
> -	 *   memory ranges, because quirks such as trim_snb_memory()
> -	 *   reserve specific pages for Sandy Bridge graphics. ]
> -	 */
> -	for_each_memblock(reserved, mb_region) {
> -		int nid = memblock_get_region_node(mb_region);
> -
> -		if (nid != MAX_NUMNODES)
> -			node_set(nid, reserved_nodemask);
> -	}
> -
>  	/*
>  	 * Finally, clear the MEMBLOCK_HOTPLUG flag for all memory
>  	 * belonging to the reserved node mask.
> -- 
> 2.26.2
> 
> 


  parent reply index

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-07-28  5:11 [PATCH 00/15] memblock: seasonal cleaning^w cleanup Mike Rapoport
2020-07-28  5:11 ` [PATCH 01/15] KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: simplify kvm_cma_reserve() Mike Rapoport
2020-07-28  5:11 ` [PATCH 02/15] dma-contiguous: simplify cma_early_percent_memory() Mike Rapoport
2020-07-28  6:37   ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-07-28  5:11 ` [PATCH 03/15] arm, xtensa: simplify initialization of high memory pages Mike Rapoport
2020-07-28  8:09   ` Max Filippov
2020-07-28  5:11 ` [PATCH 04/15] arm64: numa: simplify dummy_numa_init() Mike Rapoport
2020-07-29  8:30   ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-07-30 12:03   ` Catalin Marinas
2020-07-28  5:11 ` [PATCH 05/15] h8300, nds32, openrisc: simplify detection of memory extents Mike Rapoport
2020-07-29 11:41   ` Stafford Horne
2020-07-28  5:11 ` [PATCH 06/15] powerpc: fadamp: simplify fadump_reserve_crash_area() Mike Rapoport
2020-07-30 12:15   ` Michael Ellerman
2020-08-01 10:18     ` Mike Rapoport
2020-08-01 10:53       ` Hari Bathini
2020-08-02 13:14       ` Michael Ellerman
2020-07-28  5:11 ` [PATCH 07/15] riscv: drop unneeded node initialization Mike Rapoport
2020-07-28  5:11 ` [PATCH 08/15] mircoblaze: drop unneeded NUMA and sparsemem initializations Mike Rapoport
2020-07-28  5:11 ` [PATCH 09/15] memblock: make for_each_memblock_type() iterator private Mike Rapoport
2020-07-30  1:52   ` Baoquan He
2020-07-28  5:11 ` [PATCH 10/15] memblock: make memblock_debug and related functionality private Mike Rapoport
2020-07-30  1:54   ` Baoquan He
2020-07-28  5:11 ` [PATCH 11/15] memblock: reduce number of parameters in for_each_mem_range() Mike Rapoport
2020-07-30  2:22   ` Baoquan He
2020-07-28  5:11 ` [PATCH 12/15] arch, mm: replace for_each_memblock() with for_each_mem_pfn_range() Mike Rapoport
2020-07-28  5:11 ` [PATCH 13/15] arch, drivers: replace for_each_membock() with for_each_mem_range() Mike Rapoport
2020-07-28 15:02   ` Emil Renner Berthing
2020-07-28  5:11 ` [PATCH 14/15] x86/numa: remove redundant iteration over memblock.reserved Mike Rapoport
2020-07-28 10:44   ` Ingo Molnar
2020-07-28 10:56     ` Mike Rapoport
2020-07-28 11:31       ` Ingo Molnar
2020-07-28 11:02   ` Baoquan He [this message]
2020-07-28 14:15     ` Mike Rapoport
2020-07-28 14:23       ` Baoquan He
2020-07-28  5:11 ` [PATCH 15/15] memblock: remove 'type' parameter from for_each_memblock() Mike Rapoport

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200728110254.GA14854@MiWiFi-R3L-srv \
    --to=bhe@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=jcmvbkbc@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-c6x-dev@linux-c6x.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mips@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=monstr@monstr.eu \
    --cc=openrisc@lists.librecores.org \
    --cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
    --cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=rppt@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=shorne@gmail.com \
    --cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=uclinux-h8-devel@lists.sourceforge.jp \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=ysato@users.sourceforge.jp \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

LinuxPPC-Dev Archive on lore.kernel.org

Archives are clonable:
	git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/linuxppc-dev/0 linuxppc-dev/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 linuxppc-dev linuxppc-dev/ https://lore.kernel.org/linuxppc-dev \
		linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
	public-inbox-index linuxppc-dev

Example config snippet for mirrors

Newsgroup available over NNTP:
	nntp://nntp.lore.kernel.org/org.ozlabs.lists.linuxppc-dev


AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git