[PATCH V5 0/4] powerpc/perf: Add support for perf extended regs in powerpc

[PATCH V5 0/4] powerpc/perf: Add support for perf extended regs in powerpc

[Athira Rajeev]

Patch set to add support for perf extended register capability in
powerpc. The capability flag PERF_PMU_CAP_EXTENDED_REGS, is used to
indicate the PMU which support extended registers. The generic code
define the mask of extended registers as 0 for non supported architectures.

Patches 1 and 2 are the kernel side changes needed to include
base support for extended regs in powerpc and in power10.
Patches 3 and 4 are the perf tools side changes needed to support the
extended registers.

patch 1/4 defines the PERF_PMU_CAP_EXTENDED_REGS mask to output the
values of mmcr0,mmcr1,mmcr2 for POWER9. Defines `PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK`
at runtime which contains mask value of the supported registers under
extended regs.

patch 2/4 adds the extended regs support for power10 and exposes
MMCR3, SIER2, SIER3 registers as part of extended regs.

Patch 3/4 and 4/4 adds extended regs to sample_reg_mask in the tool
side to use with `-I?` option for power9 and power10 respectively.

Ravi bangoria found an issue with `perf record -I` while testing the
changes. The same issue is currently being worked on here:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/7/19/413 and will be resolved once fix
from Jin Yao is merged.

This patch series is based on powerpc/next

Changelog:

Changes from v4 -> v5
- initialize `perf_reg_extended_max` to work on
  all platforms as suggested by Ravi Bangoria
- Added Reviewed-and-Tested-by from Ravi Bangoria

Changes from v3 -> v4
- Split the series and send extended regs as separate patch set here.
  Link to previous series :
  https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linuxppc-dev/list/?series=190462&state=*
  Other PMU patches are already merged in powerpc/next.

- Fixed kernel build issue when using config having
  CONFIG_PERF_EVENTS set and without CONFIG_PPC_PERF_CTRS
  reported by kernel build bot.
- Included Reviewed-by from Kajol Jain.
- Addressed review comments from Ravi Bangoria to initialize `perf_reg_extended_max`
  and define it in lowercase since it is local variable.

Anju T Sudhakar (2):
  powerpc/perf: Add support for outputting extended regs in perf
    intr_regs
  tools/perf: Add perf tools support for extended register capability in
    powerpc

Athira Rajeev (2):
  powerpc/perf: Add extended regs support for power10 platform
  tools/perf: Add perf tools support for extended regs in power10

 arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event.h           |  3 ++
 arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event_server.h    |  5 +++
 arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h       | 20 ++++++++-
 arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c                 |  1 +
 arch/powerpc/perf/perf_regs.c                   | 44 ++++++++++++++++++--
 arch/powerpc/perf/power10-pmu.c                 |  6 +++
 arch/powerpc/perf/power9-pmu.c                  |  6 +++
 tools/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h | 20 ++++++++-
 tools/perf/arch/powerpc/include/perf_regs.h     |  8 +++-
 tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/header.c           |  9 +---
 tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/perf_regs.c        | 55 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
 tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/utils_header.h     | 15 +++++++
 12 files changed, 178 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/utils_header.h

-- 
1.8.3.1

[PATCH V5 1/4] powerpc/perf: Add support for outputting extended regs in perf intr_regs

[Athira Rajeev]

From: Anju T Sudhakar <anju@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

Add support for perf extended register capability in powerpc.
The capability flag PERF_PMU_CAP_EXTENDED_REGS, is used to indicate the
PMU which support extended registers. The generic code define the mask
of extended registers as 0 for non supported architectures.

Patch adds extended regs support for power9 platform by
exposing MMCR0, MMCR1 and MMCR2 registers.

REG_RESERVED mask needs update to include extended regs.
`PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK`, contains mask value of the supported registers,
is defined at runtime in the kernel based on platform since the supported
registers may differ from one processor version to another and hence the
MASK value.

with patch
----------

available registers: r0 r1 r2 r3 r4 r5 r6 r7 r8 r9 r10 r11
r12 r13 r14 r15 r16 r17 r18 r19 r20 r21 r22 r23 r24 r25 r26
r27 r28 r29 r30 r31 nip msr orig_r3 ctr link xer ccr softe
trap dar dsisr sier mmcra mmcr0 mmcr1 mmcr2

PERF_RECORD_SAMPLE(IP, 0x1): 4784/4784: 0 period: 1 addr: 0
... intr regs: mask 0xffffffffffff ABI 64-bit
.... r0    0xc00000000012b77c
.... r1    0xc000003fe5e03930
.... r2    0xc000000001b0e000
.... r3    0xc000003fdcddf800
.... r4    0xc000003fc7880000
.... r5    0x9c422724be
.... r6    0xc000003fe5e03908
.... r7    0xffffff63bddc8706
.... r8    0x9e4
.... r9    0x0
.... r10   0x1
.... r11   0x0
.... r12   0xc0000000001299c0
.... r13   0xc000003ffffc4800
.... r14   0x0
.... r15   0x7fffdd8b8b00
.... r16   0x0
.... r17   0x7fffdd8be6b8
.... r18   0x7e7076607730
.... r19   0x2f
.... r20   0xc00000001fc26c68
.... r21   0xc0002041e4227e00
.... r22   0xc00000002018fb60
.... r23   0x1
.... r24   0xc000003ffec4d900
.... r25   0x80000000
.... r26   0x0
.... r27   0x1
.... r28   0x1
.... r29   0xc000000001be1260
.... r30   0x6008010
.... r31   0xc000003ffebb7218
.... nip   0xc00000000012b910
.... msr   0x9000000000009033
.... orig_r3 0xc00000000012b86c
.... ctr   0xc0000000001299c0
.... link  0xc00000000012b77c
.... xer   0x0
.... ccr   0x28002222
.... softe 0x1
.... trap  0xf00
.... dar   0x0
.... dsisr 0x80000000000
.... sier  0x0
.... mmcra 0x80000000000
.... mmcr0 0x82008090
.... mmcr1 0x1e000000
.... mmcr2 0x0
 ... thread: perf:4784

Signed-off-by: Anju T Sudhakar <anju@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
[Defined PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK at run time to add support for different platforms ]
Signed-off-by: Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
[Fix build issue using CONFIG_PERF_EVENTS without CONFIG_PPC_PERF_CTRS]
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Kajol Jain <kjain@linux.ibm.com>
Tested-by: Nageswara R Sastry <nasastry@in.ibm.com>
Reviewed-and-tested-by: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com>
---
 arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event.h        |  3 +++
 arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event_server.h |  5 ++++
 arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h    | 14 +++++++++++-
 arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c              |  1 +
 arch/powerpc/perf/perf_regs.c                | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---
 arch/powerpc/perf/power9-pmu.c               |  6 +++++
 6 files changed, 59 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event.h
index 1e8b2e1..daec64d 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event.h
@@ -40,4 +40,7 @@
 
 /* To support perf_regs sier update */
 extern bool is_sier_available(void);
+/* To define perf extended regs mask value */
+extern u64 PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK;
+#define PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK	PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK
 #endif
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event_server.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event_server.h
index 86c9eb06..f6acabb 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event_server.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event_server.h
@@ -62,6 +62,11 @@ struct power_pmu {
 	int 		*blacklist_ev;
 	/* BHRB entries in the PMU */
 	int		bhrb_nr;
+	/*
+	 * set this flag with `PERF_PMU_CAP_EXTENDED_REGS` if
+	 * the pmu supports extended perf regs capability
+	 */
+	int		capabilities;
 };
 
 /*
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h b/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h
index f599064..225c64c 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h
@@ -48,6 +48,18 @@ enum perf_event_powerpc_regs {
 	PERF_REG_POWERPC_DSISR,
 	PERF_REG_POWERPC_SIER,
 	PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCRA,
-	PERF_REG_POWERPC_MAX,
+	/* Extended registers */
+	PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR0,
+	PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR1,
+	PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR2,
+	/* Max regs without the extended regs */
+	PERF_REG_POWERPC_MAX = PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCRA + 1,
 };
+
+#define PERF_REG_PMU_MASK	((1ULL << PERF_REG_POWERPC_MAX) - 1)
+
+/* PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK value for CPU_FTR_ARCH_300 */
+#define PERF_REG_PMU_MASK_300   (((1ULL << (PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR2 + 1)) - 1) - PERF_REG_PMU_MASK)
+
+#define PERF_REG_MAX_ISA_300   (PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR2 + 1)
 #endif /* _UAPI_ASM_POWERPC_PERF_REGS_H */
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
index e29c846..65a0b76 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
@@ -2317,6 +2317,7 @@ int register_power_pmu(struct power_pmu *pmu)
 		pmu->name);
 
 	power_pmu.attr_groups = ppmu->attr_groups;
+	power_pmu.capabilities |= (ppmu->capabilities & PERF_PMU_CAP_EXTENDED_REGS);
 
 #ifdef MSR_HV
 	/*
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/perf_regs.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/perf_regs.c
index a213a0a..9301e68 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/perf/perf_regs.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/perf_regs.c
@@ -13,9 +13,11 @@
 #include <asm/ptrace.h>
 #include <asm/perf_regs.h>
 
+u64 PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK;
+
 #define PT_REGS_OFFSET(id, r) [id] = offsetof(struct pt_regs, r)
 
-#define REG_RESERVED (~((1ULL << PERF_REG_POWERPC_MAX) - 1))
+#define REG_RESERVED (~(PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK | PERF_REG_PMU_MASK))
 
 static unsigned int pt_regs_offset[PERF_REG_POWERPC_MAX] = {
 	PT_REGS_OFFSET(PERF_REG_POWERPC_R0,  gpr[0]),
@@ -69,10 +71,26 @@
 	PT_REGS_OFFSET(PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCRA, dsisr),
 };
 
+/* Function to return the extended register values */
+static u64 get_ext_regs_value(int idx)
+{
+	switch (idx) {
+	case PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR0:
+		return mfspr(SPRN_MMCR0);
+	case PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR1:
+		return mfspr(SPRN_MMCR1);
+	case PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR2:
+		return mfspr(SPRN_MMCR2);
+	default: return 0;
+	}
+}
+
 u64 perf_reg_value(struct pt_regs *regs, int idx)
 {
-	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(idx >= PERF_REG_POWERPC_MAX))
-		return 0;
+	u64 perf_reg_extended_max = PERF_REG_POWERPC_MAX;
+
+	if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_300))
+		perf_reg_extended_max = PERF_REG_MAX_ISA_300;
 
 	if (idx == PERF_REG_POWERPC_SIER &&
 	   (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_FSL_EMB_PERF_EVENT) ||
@@ -85,6 +103,16 @@ u64 perf_reg_value(struct pt_regs *regs, int idx)
 	    IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PPC32)))
 		return 0;
 
+	if (idx >= PERF_REG_POWERPC_MAX && idx < perf_reg_extended_max)
+		return get_ext_regs_value(idx);
+
+	/*
+	 * If the idx is referring to value beyond the
+	 * supported registers, return 0 with a warning
+	 */
+	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(idx >= perf_reg_extended_max))
+		return 0;
+
 	return regs_get_register(regs, pt_regs_offset[idx]);
 }
 
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/power9-pmu.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/power9-pmu.c
index 05dae38..2a57e93 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/perf/power9-pmu.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/power9-pmu.c
@@ -90,6 +90,8 @@ enum {
 #define POWER9_MMCRA_IFM3		0x00000000C0000000UL
 #define POWER9_MMCRA_BHRB_MASK		0x00000000C0000000UL
 
+extern u64 PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK;
+
 /* Nasty Power9 specific hack */
 #define PVR_POWER9_CUMULUS		0x00002000
 
@@ -434,6 +436,7 @@ static void power9_config_bhrb(u64 pmu_bhrb_filter)
 	.cache_events		= &power9_cache_events,
 	.attr_groups		= power9_pmu_attr_groups,
 	.bhrb_nr		= 32,
+	.capabilities           = PERF_PMU_CAP_EXTENDED_REGS,
 };
 
 int init_power9_pmu(void)
@@ -457,6 +460,9 @@ int init_power9_pmu(void)
 		}
 	}
 
+	/* Set the PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK here */
+	PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK = PERF_REG_PMU_MASK_300;
+
 	rc = register_power_pmu(&power9_pmu);
 	if (rc)
 		return rc;
-- 
1.8.3.1

[PATCH V5 2/4] powerpc/perf: Add extended regs support for power10 platform

[Athira Rajeev]

Include capability flag `PERF_PMU_CAP_EXTENDED_REGS` for power10
and expose MMCR3, SIER2, SIER3 registers as part of extended regs.
Also introduce `PERF_REG_PMU_MASK_31` to define extended mask
value at runtime for power10

Signed-off-by: Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
[Fix build failure on PPC32 platform]
Suggested-by: Ryan Grimm <grimm@linux.ibm.com>
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Kajol Jain <kjain@linux.ibm.com>
Tested-by: Nageswara R Sastry <nasastry@in.ibm.com>
Reviewed-and-tested-by: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com>
---
 arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h |  6 ++++++
 arch/powerpc/perf/perf_regs.c             | 12 +++++++++++-
 arch/powerpc/perf/power10-pmu.c           |  6 ++++++
 3 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h b/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h
index 225c64c..bdf5f10 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h
@@ -52,6 +52,9 @@ enum perf_event_powerpc_regs {
 	PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR0,
 	PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR1,
 	PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR2,
+	PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR3,
+	PERF_REG_POWERPC_SIER2,
+	PERF_REG_POWERPC_SIER3,
 	/* Max regs without the extended regs */
 	PERF_REG_POWERPC_MAX = PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCRA + 1,
 };
@@ -60,6 +63,9 @@ enum perf_event_powerpc_regs {
 
 /* PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK value for CPU_FTR_ARCH_300 */
 #define PERF_REG_PMU_MASK_300   (((1ULL << (PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR2 + 1)) - 1) - PERF_REG_PMU_MASK)
+/* PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK value for CPU_FTR_ARCH_31 */
+#define PERF_REG_PMU_MASK_31   (((1ULL << (PERF_REG_POWERPC_SIER3 + 1)) - 1) - PERF_REG_PMU_MASK)
 
 #define PERF_REG_MAX_ISA_300   (PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR2 + 1)
+#define PERF_REG_MAX_ISA_31    (PERF_REG_POWERPC_SIER3 + 1)
 #endif /* _UAPI_ASM_POWERPC_PERF_REGS_H */
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/perf_regs.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/perf_regs.c
index 9301e68..8e53f2f 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/perf/perf_regs.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/perf_regs.c
@@ -81,6 +81,14 @@ static u64 get_ext_regs_value(int idx)
 		return mfspr(SPRN_MMCR1);
 	case PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR2:
 		return mfspr(SPRN_MMCR2);
+#ifdef CONFIG_PPC64
+	case PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR3:
+		return mfspr(SPRN_MMCR3);
+	case PERF_REG_POWERPC_SIER2:
+		return mfspr(SPRN_SIER2);
+	case PERF_REG_POWERPC_SIER3:
+		return mfspr(SPRN_SIER3);
+#endif
 	default: return 0;
 	}
 }
@@ -89,7 +97,9 @@ u64 perf_reg_value(struct pt_regs *regs, int idx)
 {
 	u64 perf_reg_extended_max = PERF_REG_POWERPC_MAX;
 
-	if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_300))
+	if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_31))
+		perf_reg_extended_max = PERF_REG_MAX_ISA_31;
+	else if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_300))
 		perf_reg_extended_max = PERF_REG_MAX_ISA_300;
 
 	if (idx == PERF_REG_POWERPC_SIER &&
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/power10-pmu.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/power10-pmu.c
index f7cff7f..8314865 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/perf/power10-pmu.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/power10-pmu.c
@@ -87,6 +87,8 @@
 #define POWER10_MMCRA_IFM3		0x00000000C0000000UL
 #define POWER10_MMCRA_BHRB_MASK		0x00000000C0000000UL
 
+extern u64 PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK;
+
 /* Table of alternatives, sorted by column 0 */
 static const unsigned int power10_event_alternatives[][MAX_ALT] = {
 	{ PM_RUN_CYC_ALT,		PM_RUN_CYC },
@@ -397,6 +399,7 @@ static void power10_config_bhrb(u64 pmu_bhrb_filter)
 	.cache_events		= &power10_cache_events,
 	.attr_groups		= power10_pmu_attr_groups,
 	.bhrb_nr		= 32,
+	.capabilities           = PERF_PMU_CAP_EXTENDED_REGS,
 };
 
 int init_power10_pmu(void)
@@ -408,6 +411,9 @@ int init_power10_pmu(void)
 	    strcmp(cur_cpu_spec->oprofile_cpu_type, "ppc64/power10"))
 		return -ENODEV;
 
+	/* Set the PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK here */
+	PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK = PERF_REG_PMU_MASK_31;
+
 	rc = register_power_pmu(&power10_pmu);
 	if (rc)
 		return rc;
-- 
1.8.3.1

[PATCH V5 3/4] tools/perf: Add perf tools support for extended register capability in powerpc

[Athira Rajeev]

From: Anju T Sudhakar <anju@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

Add extended regs to sample_reg_mask in the tool side to use
with `-I?` option. Perf tools side uses extended mask to display
the platform supported register names (with -I? option) to the user
and also send this mask to the kernel to capture the extended registers
in each sample. Hence decide the mask value based on the processor
version.

Currently definitions for `mfspr`, `SPRN_PVR` are part of
`arch/powerpc/util/header.c`. Move this to a header file so that
these definitions can be re-used in other source files as well.

Signed-off-by: Anju T Sudhakar <anju@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
[Decide extended mask at run time based on platform]
Signed-off-by: Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Kajol Jain <kjain@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-and-tested-by: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com>
---
 tools/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h | 14 ++++++-
 tools/perf/arch/powerpc/include/perf_regs.h     |  5 ++-
 tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/header.c           |  9 +----
 tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/perf_regs.c        | 49 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
 tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/utils_header.h     | 15 ++++++++
 5 files changed, 82 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/utils_header.h

diff --git a/tools/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h b/tools/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h
index f599064..225c64c 100644
--- a/tools/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h
+++ b/tools/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h
@@ -48,6 +48,18 @@ enum perf_event_powerpc_regs {
 	PERF_REG_POWERPC_DSISR,
 	PERF_REG_POWERPC_SIER,
 	PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCRA,
-	PERF_REG_POWERPC_MAX,
+	/* Extended registers */
+	PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR0,
+	PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR1,
+	PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR2,
+	/* Max regs without the extended regs */
+	PERF_REG_POWERPC_MAX = PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCRA + 1,
 };
+
+#define PERF_REG_PMU_MASK	((1ULL << PERF_REG_POWERPC_MAX) - 1)
+
+/* PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK value for CPU_FTR_ARCH_300 */
+#define PERF_REG_PMU_MASK_300   (((1ULL << (PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR2 + 1)) - 1) - PERF_REG_PMU_MASK)
+
+#define PERF_REG_MAX_ISA_300   (PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR2 + 1)
 #endif /* _UAPI_ASM_POWERPC_PERF_REGS_H */
diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/include/perf_regs.h b/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/include/perf_regs.h
index e18a355..46ed00d 100644
--- a/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/include/perf_regs.h
+++ b/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/include/perf_regs.h
@@ -64,7 +64,10 @@
 	[PERF_REG_POWERPC_DAR] = "dar",
 	[PERF_REG_POWERPC_DSISR] = "dsisr",
 	[PERF_REG_POWERPC_SIER] = "sier",
-	[PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCRA] = "mmcra"
+	[PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCRA] = "mmcra",
+	[PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR0] = "mmcr0",
+	[PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR1] = "mmcr1",
+	[PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR2] = "mmcr2",
 };
 
 static inline const char *perf_reg_name(int id)
diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/header.c b/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/header.c
index d487007..1a95017 100644
--- a/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/header.c
+++ b/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/header.c
@@ -7,17 +7,10 @@
 #include <string.h>
 #include <linux/stringify.h>
 #include "header.h"
+#include "utils_header.h"
 #include "metricgroup.h"
 #include <api/fs/fs.h>
 
-#define mfspr(rn)       ({unsigned long rval; \
-			 asm volatile("mfspr %0," __stringify(rn) \
-				      : "=r" (rval)); rval; })
-
-#define SPRN_PVR        0x11F	/* Processor Version Register */
-#define PVR_VER(pvr)    (((pvr) >>  16) & 0xFFFF) /* Version field */
-#define PVR_REV(pvr)    (((pvr) >>   0) & 0xFFFF) /* Revison field */
-
 int
 get_cpuid(char *buffer, size_t sz)
 {
diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/perf_regs.c b/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/perf_regs.c
index 0a52429..d64ba0c 100644
--- a/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/perf_regs.c
+++ b/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/perf_regs.c
@@ -6,9 +6,15 @@
 
 #include "../../../util/perf_regs.h"
 #include "../../../util/debug.h"
+#include "../../../util/event.h"
+#include "../../../util/header.h"
+#include "../../../perf-sys.h"
+#include "utils_header.h"
 
 #include <linux/kernel.h>
 
+#define PVR_POWER9		0x004E
+
 const struct sample_reg sample_reg_masks[] = {
 	SMPL_REG(r0, PERF_REG_POWERPC_R0),
 	SMPL_REG(r1, PERF_REG_POWERPC_R1),
@@ -55,6 +61,9 @@
 	SMPL_REG(dsisr, PERF_REG_POWERPC_DSISR),
 	SMPL_REG(sier, PERF_REG_POWERPC_SIER),
 	SMPL_REG(mmcra, PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCRA),
+	SMPL_REG(mmcr0, PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR0),
+	SMPL_REG(mmcr1, PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR1),
+	SMPL_REG(mmcr2, PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR2),
 	SMPL_REG_END
 };
 
@@ -163,3 +172,43 @@ int arch_sdt_arg_parse_op(char *old_op, char **new_op)
 
 	return SDT_ARG_VALID;
 }
+
+uint64_t arch__intr_reg_mask(void)
+{
+	struct perf_event_attr attr = {
+		.type                   = PERF_TYPE_HARDWARE,
+		.config                 = PERF_COUNT_HW_CPU_CYCLES,
+		.sample_type            = PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_INTR,
+		.precise_ip             = 1,
+		.disabled               = 1,
+		.exclude_kernel         = 1,
+	};
+	int fd;
+	u32 version;
+	u64 extended_mask = 0, mask = PERF_REGS_MASK;
+
+	/*
+	 * Get the PVR value to set the extended
+	 * mask specific to platform.
+	 */
+	version = (((mfspr(SPRN_PVR)) >>  16) & 0xFFFF);
+	if (version == PVR_POWER9)
+		extended_mask = PERF_REG_PMU_MASK_300;
+	else
+		return mask;
+
+	attr.sample_regs_intr = extended_mask;
+	attr.sample_period = 1;
+	event_attr_init(&attr);
+
+	/*
+	 * check if the pmu supports perf extended regs, before
+	 * returning the register mask to sample.
+	 */
+	fd = sys_perf_event_open(&attr, 0, -1, -1, 0);
+	if (fd != -1) {
+		close(fd);
+		mask |= extended_mask;
+	}
+	return mask;
+}
diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/utils_header.h b/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/utils_header.h
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..5788eb1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/utils_header.h
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
+#ifndef __PERF_UTIL_HEADER_H
+#define __PERF_UTIL_HEADER_H
+
+#include <linux/stringify.h>
+
+#define mfspr(rn)       ({unsigned long rval; \
+			asm volatile("mfspr %0," __stringify(rn) \
+				: "=r" (rval)); rval; })
+
+#define SPRN_PVR        0x11F   /* Processor Version Register */
+#define PVR_VER(pvr)    (((pvr) >>  16) & 0xFFFF) /* Version field */
+#define PVR_REV(pvr)    (((pvr) >>   0) & 0xFFFF) /* Revison field */
+
+#endif /* __PERF_UTIL_HEADER_H */
-- 
1.8.3.1

[PATCH V5 4/4] tools/perf: Add perf tools support for extended regs in power10

[Athira Rajeev]

Added support for supported regs which are new in power10
( MMCR3, SIER2, SIER3 ) to sample_reg_mask in the tool side
to use with `-I?` option. Also added PVR check to send extended
mask for power10 at kernel while capturing extended regs in
each sample.

Signed-off-by: Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Kajol Jain <kjain@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-and-tested-by: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com>
---
 tools/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h | 6 ++++++
 tools/perf/arch/powerpc/include/perf_regs.h     | 3 +++
 tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/perf_regs.c        | 6 ++++++
 3 files changed, 15 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tools/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h b/tools/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h
index 225c64c..bdf5f10 100644
--- a/tools/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h
+++ b/tools/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h
@@ -52,6 +52,9 @@ enum perf_event_powerpc_regs {
 	PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR0,
 	PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR1,
 	PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR2,
+	PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR3,
+	PERF_REG_POWERPC_SIER2,
+	PERF_REG_POWERPC_SIER3,
 	/* Max regs without the extended regs */
 	PERF_REG_POWERPC_MAX = PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCRA + 1,
 };
@@ -60,6 +63,9 @@ enum perf_event_powerpc_regs {
 
 /* PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK value for CPU_FTR_ARCH_300 */
 #define PERF_REG_PMU_MASK_300   (((1ULL << (PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR2 + 1)) - 1) - PERF_REG_PMU_MASK)
+/* PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK value for CPU_FTR_ARCH_31 */
+#define PERF_REG_PMU_MASK_31   (((1ULL << (PERF_REG_POWERPC_SIER3 + 1)) - 1) - PERF_REG_PMU_MASK)
 
 #define PERF_REG_MAX_ISA_300   (PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR2 + 1)
+#define PERF_REG_MAX_ISA_31    (PERF_REG_POWERPC_SIER3 + 1)
 #endif /* _UAPI_ASM_POWERPC_PERF_REGS_H */
diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/include/perf_regs.h b/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/include/perf_regs.h
index 46ed00d..63f3ac9 100644
--- a/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/include/perf_regs.h
+++ b/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/include/perf_regs.h
@@ -68,6 +68,9 @@
 	[PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR0] = "mmcr0",
 	[PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR1] = "mmcr1",
 	[PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR2] = "mmcr2",
+	[PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR3] = "mmcr3",
+	[PERF_REG_POWERPC_SIER2] = "sier2",
+	[PERF_REG_POWERPC_SIER3] = "sier3",
 };
 
 static inline const char *perf_reg_name(int id)
diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/perf_regs.c b/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/perf_regs.c
index d64ba0c..2b6d470 100644
--- a/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/perf_regs.c
+++ b/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/perf_regs.c
@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
 #include <linux/kernel.h>
 
 #define PVR_POWER9		0x004E
+#define PVR_POWER10		0x0080
 
 const struct sample_reg sample_reg_masks[] = {
 	SMPL_REG(r0, PERF_REG_POWERPC_R0),
@@ -64,6 +65,9 @@
 	SMPL_REG(mmcr0, PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR0),
 	SMPL_REG(mmcr1, PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR1),
 	SMPL_REG(mmcr2, PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR2),
+	SMPL_REG(mmcr3, PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR3),
+	SMPL_REG(sier2, PERF_REG_POWERPC_SIER2),
+	SMPL_REG(sier3, PERF_REG_POWERPC_SIER3),
 	SMPL_REG_END
 };
 
@@ -194,6 +198,8 @@ uint64_t arch__intr_reg_mask(void)
 	version = (((mfspr(SPRN_PVR)) >>  16) & 0xFFFF);
 	if (version == PVR_POWER9)
 		extended_mask = PERF_REG_PMU_MASK_300;
+	else if (version == PVR_POWER10)
+		extended_mask = PERF_REG_PMU_MASK_31;
 	else
 		return mask;
 
-- 
1.8.3.1

Re: [PATCH V5 0/4] powerpc/perf: Add support for perf extended regs in powerpc

[Athira Rajeev]

> On 27-Jul-2020, at 10:46 PM, Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> 
> Patch set to add support for perf extended register capability in
> powerpc. The capability flag PERF_PMU_CAP_EXTENDED_REGS, is used to
> indicate the PMU which support extended registers. The generic code
> define the mask of extended registers as 0 for non supported architectures.
> 
> Patches 1 and 2 are the kernel side changes needed to include
> base support for extended regs in powerpc and in power10.
> Patches 3 and 4 are the perf tools side changes needed to support the
> extended registers.
> 

Hi Arnaldo, Jiri

please let me know if you have any comments/suggestions on this patch series to add support for perf extended regs.

Thanks
Athira

> patch 1/4 defines the PERF_PMU_CAP_EXTENDED_REGS mask to output the
> values of mmcr0,mmcr1,mmcr2 for POWER9. Defines `PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK`
> at runtime which contains mask value of the supported registers under
> extended regs.
> 
> patch 2/4 adds the extended regs support for power10 and exposes
> MMCR3, SIER2, SIER3 registers as part of extended regs.
> 
> Patch 3/4 and 4/4 adds extended regs to sample_reg_mask in the tool
> side to use with `-I?` option for power9 and power10 respectively.
> 
> Ravi bangoria found an issue with `perf record -I` while testing the
> changes. The same issue is currently being worked on here:
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/7/19/413 and will be resolved once fix
> from Jin Yao is merged.
> 
> This patch series is based on powerpc/next
> 
> Changelog:
> 
> Changes from v4 -> v5
> - initialize `perf_reg_extended_max` to work on
>  all platforms as suggested by Ravi Bangoria
> - Added Reviewed-and-Tested-by from Ravi Bangoria
> 
> Changes from v3 -> v4
> - Split the series and send extended regs as separate patch set here.
>  Link to previous series :
>  https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linuxppc-dev/list/?series=190462&state=*
>  Other PMU patches are already merged in powerpc/next.
> 
> - Fixed kernel build issue when using config having
>  CONFIG_PERF_EVENTS set and without CONFIG_PPC_PERF_CTRS
>  reported by kernel build bot.
> - Included Reviewed-by from Kajol Jain.
> - Addressed review comments from Ravi Bangoria to initialize `perf_reg_extended_max`
>  and define it in lowercase since it is local variable.
> 
> Anju T Sudhakar (2):
>  powerpc/perf: Add support for outputting extended regs in perf
>    intr_regs
>  tools/perf: Add perf tools support for extended register capability in
>    powerpc
> 
> Athira Rajeev (2):
>  powerpc/perf: Add extended regs support for power10 platform
>  tools/perf: Add perf tools support for extended regs in power10
> 
> arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event.h           |  3 ++
> arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event_server.h    |  5 +++
> arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h       | 20 ++++++++-
> arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c                 |  1 +
> arch/powerpc/perf/perf_regs.c                   | 44 ++++++++++++++++++--
> arch/powerpc/perf/power10-pmu.c                 |  6 +++
> arch/powerpc/perf/power9-pmu.c                  |  6 +++
> tools/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h | 20 ++++++++-
> tools/perf/arch/powerpc/include/perf_regs.h     |  8 +++-
> tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/header.c           |  9 +---
> tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/perf_regs.c        | 55 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
> tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/utils_header.h     | 15 +++++++
> 12 files changed, 178 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/utils_header.h
> 
> -- 
> 1.8.3.1
> 

Re: [PATCH V5 0/4] powerpc/perf: Add support for perf extended regs in powerpc

[Jiri Olsa]

On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 01:24:40PM +0530, Athira Rajeev wrote:
> 
> 
> > On 27-Jul-2020, at 10:46 PM, Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> > 
> > Patch set to add support for perf extended register capability in
> > powerpc. The capability flag PERF_PMU_CAP_EXTENDED_REGS, is used to
> > indicate the PMU which support extended registers. The generic code
> > define the mask of extended registers as 0 for non supported architectures.
> > 
> > Patches 1 and 2 are the kernel side changes needed to include
> > base support for extended regs in powerpc and in power10.
> > Patches 3 and 4 are the perf tools side changes needed to support the
> > extended registers.
> > 
> 
> Hi Arnaldo, Jiri
> 
> please let me know if you have any comments/suggestions on this patch series to add support for perf extended regs.

hi,
can't really tell for powerpc, but in general
perf tool changes look ok

jirka

Re: [PATCH V5 0/4] powerpc/perf: Add support for perf extended regs in powerpc

[Athira Rajeev]

> On 31-Jul-2020, at 1:20 AM, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> wrote:
> 
> On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 01:24:40PM +0530, Athira Rajeev wrote:
>> 
>> 
>>> On 27-Jul-2020, at 10:46 PM, Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Patch set to add support for perf extended register capability in
>>> powerpc. The capability flag PERF_PMU_CAP_EXTENDED_REGS, is used to
>>> indicate the PMU which support extended registers. The generic code
>>> define the mask of extended registers as 0 for non supported architectures.
>>> 
>>> Patches 1 and 2 are the kernel side changes needed to include
>>> base support for extended regs in powerpc and in power10.
>>> Patches 3 and 4 are the perf tools side changes needed to support the
>>> extended registers.
>>> 
>> 
>> Hi Arnaldo, Jiri
>> 
>> please let me know if you have any comments/suggestions on this patch series to add support for perf extended regs.
> 
> hi,
> can't really tell for powerpc, but in general
> perf tool changes look ok
> 

Hi Jiri,
Thanks for checking the patchset.

Athira.

> jirka

Re: [PATCH V5 0/4] powerpc/perf: Add support for perf extended regs in powerpc

[Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo]

Em Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 11:04:14PM +0530, Athira Rajeev escreveu:
> 
> 
> > On 31-Jul-2020, at 1:20 AM, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> wrote:
> > 
> > On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 01:24:40PM +0530, Athira Rajeev wrote:
> >> 
> >> 
> >>> On 27-Jul-2020, at 10:46 PM, Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> >>> 
> >>> Patch set to add support for perf extended register capability in
> >>> powerpc. The capability flag PERF_PMU_CAP_EXTENDED_REGS, is used to
> >>> indicate the PMU which support extended registers. The generic code
> >>> define the mask of extended registers as 0 for non supported architectures.
> >>> 
> >>> Patches 1 and 2 are the kernel side changes needed to include
> >>> base support for extended regs in powerpc and in power10.
> >>> Patches 3 and 4 are the perf tools side changes needed to support the
> >>> extended registers.
> >>> 
> >> 
> >> Hi Arnaldo, Jiri
> >> 
> >> please let me know if you have any comments/suggestions on this patch series to add support for perf extended regs.
> > 
> > hi,
> > can't really tell for powerpc, but in general
> > perf tool changes look ok
> > 
> 
> Hi Jiri,
> Thanks for checking the patchset.

So I'dd say you submit a v6, split into the kernel part, that probably
should go via the PPC arch tree, and I can pick the tooling part, ok?

- Arnaldo

Re: [PATCH V5 0/4] powerpc/perf: Add support for perf extended regs in powerpc

[Athira Rajeev]

> On 06-Aug-2020, at 5:50 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org> wrote:
> 
> Em Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 11:04:14PM +0530, Athira Rajeev escreveu:
>> 
>> 
>>> On 31-Jul-2020, at 1:20 AM, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 01:24:40PM +0530, Athira Rajeev wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> On 27-Jul-2020, at 10:46 PM, Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Patch set to add support for perf extended register capability in
>>>>> powerpc. The capability flag PERF_PMU_CAP_EXTENDED_REGS, is used to
>>>>> indicate the PMU which support extended registers. The generic code
>>>>> define the mask of extended registers as 0 for non supported architectures.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Patches 1 and 2 are the kernel side changes needed to include
>>>>> base support for extended regs in powerpc and in power10.
>>>>> Patches 3 and 4 are the perf tools side changes needed to support the
>>>>> extended registers.
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Hi Arnaldo, Jiri
>>>> 
>>>> please let me know if you have any comments/suggestions on this patch series to add support for perf extended regs.
>>> 
>>> hi,
>>> can't really tell for powerpc, but in general
>>> perf tool changes look ok
>>> 
>> 
>> Hi Jiri,
>> Thanks for checking the patchset.
> 
> So I'dd say you submit a v6, split into the kernel part, that probably
> should go via the PPC arch tree, and I can pick the tooling part, ok?
> 
> - Arnaldo

Sure Arnaldo, I will send a v6.

Thanks,
Athira