From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A304C433E0 for ; Thu, 30 Jul 2020 19:52:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BDEC32074B for ; Thu, 30 Jul 2020 19:52:58 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="EaAXsrUr"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="WX9FICYf" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org BDEC32074B Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from bilbo.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BHh0S4FXWzDrBl for ; Fri, 31 Jul 2020 05:52:56 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com (client-ip=207.211.31.120; helo=us-smtp-1.mimecast.com; envelope-from=jolsa@redhat.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=EaAXsrUr; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=WX9FICYf; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from us-smtp-1.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com [207.211.31.120]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BHgyQ59DqzDrBf for ; Fri, 31 Jul 2020 05:51:07 +1000 (AEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1596138664; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=xR/gVAeuimxErZha5G/Neri0uTmAQhj3WsbxtwQPPUU=; b=EaAXsrUrmSVinLkR3Wqw4rOyF4P4zoaQVhRu3XUizcDQly8VjOrua5ufywOW956v8TWz9+ Sk16R3IrkJb8OFGf7xYKTllUpT1604hI5sjAkHt/vgZXZDdSwjElyn3tyfwTsqzfCmpBn2 GPD3O8n+9furXomPsNgnCygiTeMgbEs= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1596138665; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=xR/gVAeuimxErZha5G/Neri0uTmAQhj3WsbxtwQPPUU=; b=WX9FICYf8i1+TtR4Q8RIknUXpcxpu2SN8LmvI5pQKNk1lHMv+R4Wfq0vFP5/i/wAUw0m6A hGxduMeir3xEZOLPTdTAdZ1iGvVI/uq+Zn5DRra3Fs3Bpg/YTe6BrQt6gI1LgRSNHtwwHY ZUxWlHRDJ8o6xzZpaqYNIDEeEcAdmgo= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-391-tczUciwSMbqRbGkxzWmkeg-1; Thu, 30 Jul 2020 15:50:53 -0400 X-MC-Unique: tczUciwSMbqRbGkxzWmkeg-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx07.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9B430107BEFD; Thu, 30 Jul 2020 19:50:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from krava (unknown [10.40.194.223]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 5C4A71001281; Thu, 30 Jul 2020 19:50:49 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2020 21:50:48 +0200 From: Jiri Olsa To: Athira Rajeev Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 0/4] powerpc/perf: Add support for perf extended regs in powerpc Message-ID: <20200730195048.GA1484375@krava> References: <1595870184-1460-1-git-send-email-atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <27D1CE26-A506-4CFF-B1C2-E0545F26E637@linux.vnet.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <27D1CE26-A506-4CFF-B1C2-E0545F26E637@linux.vnet.ibm.com> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 on 10.5.11.22 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Ravi Bangoria , Michael Neuling , maddy@linux.vnet.ibm.com, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Jiri Olsa , kjain@linux.ibm.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 01:24:40PM +0530, Athira Rajeev wrote: > > > > On 27-Jul-2020, at 10:46 PM, Athira Rajeev wrote: > > > > Patch set to add support for perf extended register capability in > > powerpc. The capability flag PERF_PMU_CAP_EXTENDED_REGS, is used to > > indicate the PMU which support extended registers. The generic code > > define the mask of extended registers as 0 for non supported architectures. > > > > Patches 1 and 2 are the kernel side changes needed to include > > base support for extended regs in powerpc and in power10. > > Patches 3 and 4 are the perf tools side changes needed to support the > > extended registers. > > > > Hi Arnaldo, Jiri > > please let me know if you have any comments/suggestions on this patch series to add support for perf extended regs. hi, can't really tell for powerpc, but in general perf tool changes look ok jirka