linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>
To: Oliver O'Halloran <oohall@gmail.com>,
	Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 15/16] powerpc/powernv/sriov: Make single PE mode a per-BAR setting
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2020 23:18:23 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200801061823.GA1203340@ubuntu-n2-xlarge-x86> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200722065715.1432738-15-oohall@gmail.com>

On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 04:57:14PM +1000, Oliver O'Halloran wrote:
> Using single PE BARs to map an SR-IOV BAR is really a choice about what
> strategy to use when mapping a BAR. It doesn't make much sense for this to
> be a global setting since a device might have one large BAR which needs to
> be mapped with single PE windows and another smaller BAR that can be mapped
> with a regular segmented window. Make the segmented vs single decision a
> per-BAR setting and clean up the logic that decides which mode to use.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Oliver O'Halloran <oohall@gmail.com>
> ---
> v2: Dropped unused total_vfs variables in pnv_pci_ioda_fixup_iov_resources()
>     Dropped bar_no from pnv_pci_iov_resource_alignment()
>     Minor re-wording of comments.
> ---
>  arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-sriov.c | 131 ++++++++++-----------
>  arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci.h       |  11 +-
>  2 files changed, 73 insertions(+), 69 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-sriov.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-sriov.c
> index ce8ad6851d73..76215d01405b 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-sriov.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-sriov.c
> @@ -146,21 +146,17 @@
>  static void pnv_pci_ioda_fixup_iov_resources(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>  {
>  	struct pnv_phb *phb = pci_bus_to_pnvhb(pdev->bus);
> -	const resource_size_t gate = phb->ioda.m64_segsize >> 2;
>  	struct resource *res;
>  	int i;
> -	resource_size_t size, total_vf_bar_sz;
> +	resource_size_t vf_bar_sz;
>  	struct pnv_iov_data *iov;
> -	int mul, total_vfs;
> +	int mul;
>  
>  	iov = kzalloc(sizeof(*iov), GFP_KERNEL);
>  	if (!iov)
>  		goto disable_iov;
>  	pdev->dev.archdata.iov_data = iov;
> -
> -	total_vfs = pci_sriov_get_totalvfs(pdev);
>  	mul = phb->ioda.total_pe_num;
> -	total_vf_bar_sz = 0;
>  
>  	for (i = 0; i < PCI_SRIOV_NUM_BARS; i++) {
>  		res = &pdev->resource[i + PCI_IOV_RESOURCES];
> @@ -173,50 +169,50 @@ static void pnv_pci_ioda_fixup_iov_resources(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>  			goto disable_iov;
>  		}
>  
> -		total_vf_bar_sz += pci_iov_resource_size(pdev,
> -				i + PCI_IOV_RESOURCES);
> +		vf_bar_sz = pci_iov_resource_size(pdev, i + PCI_IOV_RESOURCES);
>  
>  		/*
> -		 * If bigger than quarter of M64 segment size, just round up
> -		 * power of two.
> +		 * Generally, one segmented M64 BAR maps one IOV BAR. However,
> +		 * if a VF BAR is too large we end up wasting a lot of space.
> +		 * If each VF needs more than 1/4 of the default m64 segment
> +		 * then each VF BAR should be mapped in single-PE mode to reduce
> +		 * the amount of space required. This does however limit the
> +		 * number of VFs we can support.
>  		 *
> -		 * Generally, one M64 BAR maps one IOV BAR. To avoid conflict
> -		 * with other devices, IOV BAR size is expanded to be
> -		 * (total_pe * VF_BAR_size).  When VF_BAR_size is half of M64
> -		 * segment size , the expanded size would equal to half of the
> -		 * whole M64 space size, which will exhaust the M64 Space and
> -		 * limit the system flexibility.  This is a design decision to
> -		 * set the boundary to quarter of the M64 segment size.
> +		 * The 1/4 limit is arbitrary and can be tweaked.
>  		 */
> -		if (total_vf_bar_sz > gate) {
> -			mul = roundup_pow_of_two(total_vfs);
> -			dev_info(&pdev->dev,
> -				"VF BAR Total IOV size %llx > %llx, roundup to %d VFs\n",
> -				total_vf_bar_sz, gate, mul);
> -			iov->m64_single_mode = true;
> -			break;
> -		}
> -	}
> +		if (vf_bar_sz > (phb->ioda.m64_segsize >> 2)) {
> +			/*
> +			 * On PHB3, the minimum size alignment of M64 BAR in
> +			 * single mode is 32MB. If this VF BAR is smaller than
> +			 * 32MB, but still too large for a segmented window
> +			 * then we can't map it and need to disable SR-IOV for
> +			 * this device.
> +			 */
> +			if (vf_bar_sz < SZ_32M) {
> +				pci_err(pdev, "VF BAR%d: %pR can't be mapped in single PE mode\n",
> +					i, res);
> +				goto disable_iov;
> +			}
>  
> -	for (i = 0; i < PCI_SRIOV_NUM_BARS; i++) {
> -		res = &pdev->resource[i + PCI_IOV_RESOURCES];
> -		if (!res->flags || res->parent)
> +			iov->m64_single_mode[i] = true;
>  			continue;
> +		}
>  
> -		size = pci_iov_resource_size(pdev, i + PCI_IOV_RESOURCES);
>  		/*
> -		 * On PHB3, the minimum size alignment of M64 BAR in single
> -		 * mode is 32MB.
> +		 * This BAR can be mapped with one segmented window, so adjust
> +		 * te resource size to accommodate.
>  		 */
> -		if (iov->m64_single_mode && (size < SZ_32M))
> -			goto disable_iov;
> +		pci_dbg(pdev, " Fixing VF BAR%d: %pR to\n", i, res);
> +		res->end = res->start + vf_bar_sz * mul - 1;
> +		pci_dbg(pdev, "                       %pR\n", res);
>  
> -		dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, " Fixing VF BAR%d: %pR to\n", i, res);
> -		res->end = res->start + size * mul - 1;
> -		dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "                       %pR\n", res);
> -		dev_info(&pdev->dev, "VF BAR%d: %pR (expanded to %d VFs for PE alignment)",
> +		pci_info(pdev, "VF BAR%d: %pR (expanded to %d VFs for PE alignment)",
>  			 i, res, mul);
> +
> +		iov->need_shift = true;
>  	}
> +
>  	iov->vfs_expanded = mul;
>  
>  	return;
> @@ -260,42 +256,40 @@ void pnv_pci_ioda_fixup_iov(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>  resource_size_t pnv_pci_iov_resource_alignment(struct pci_dev *pdev,
>  						      int resno)
>  {
> -	struct pnv_phb *phb = pci_bus_to_pnvhb(pdev->bus);
>  	struct pnv_iov_data *iov = pnv_iov_get(pdev);
>  	resource_size_t align;
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * iov can be null if we have an SR-IOV device with IOV BAR that can't
> +	 * be placed in the m64 space (i.e. The BAR is 32bit or non-prefetch).
> +	 * In that case we don't allow VFs to be enabled since one of their
> +	 * BARs would not be placed in the correct PE.
> +	 */
> +	if (!iov)
> +		return align;
> +	if (!iov->vfs_expanded)
> +		return align;
> +
> +	align = pci_iov_resource_size(pdev, resno);

I am not sure if it has been reported yet but clang points out that
align is initialized after its use:

arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-sriov.c:267:10: warning: variable 'align' is uninitialized when used here [-Wuninitialized]
                return align;
                       ^~~~~
arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-sriov.c:258:23: note: initialize the variable 'align' to silence this warning
        resource_size_t align;
                             ^
                              = 0
1 warning generated.

> +	/*
> +	 * If we're using single mode then we can just use the native VF BAR
> +	 * alignment. We validated that it's possible to use a single PE
> +	 * window above when we did the fixup.
> +	 */
> +	if (iov->m64_single_mode[resno - PCI_IOV_RESOURCES])
> +		return align;
> +
>  	/*
>  	 * On PowerNV platform, IOV BAR is mapped by M64 BAR to enable the
>  	 * SR-IOV. While from hardware perspective, the range mapped by M64
>  	 * BAR should be size aligned.
>  	 *
> -	 * When IOV BAR is mapped with M64 BAR in Single PE mode, the extra
> -	 * powernv-specific hardware restriction is gone. But if just use the
> -	 * VF BAR size as the alignment, PF BAR / VF BAR may be allocated with
> -	 * in one segment of M64 #15, which introduces the PE conflict between
> -	 * PF and VF. Based on this, the minimum alignment of an IOV BAR is
> -	 * m64_segsize.
> -	 *
>  	 * This function returns the total IOV BAR size if M64 BAR is in
>  	 * Shared PE mode or just VF BAR size if not.
>  	 * If the M64 BAR is in Single PE mode, return the VF BAR size or
>  	 * M64 segment size if IOV BAR size is less.
>  	 */
> -	align = pci_iov_resource_size(pdev, resno);
> -
> -	/*
> -	 * iov can be null if we have an SR-IOV device with IOV BAR that can't
> -	 * be placed in the m64 space (i.e. The BAR is 32bit or non-prefetch).
> -	 * In that case we don't allow VFs to be enabled so just return the
> -	 * default alignment.
> -	 */
> -	if (!iov)
> -		return align;
> -	if (!iov->vfs_expanded)
> -		return align;
> -	if (iov->m64_single_mode)
> -		return max(align, (resource_size_t)phb->ioda.m64_segsize);
> -
>  	return iov->vfs_expanded * align;
>  }
>  
> @@ -450,7 +444,7 @@ static int pnv_pci_vf_assign_m64(struct pci_dev *pdev, u16 num_vfs)
>  			continue;
>  
>  		/* don't need single mode? map everything in one go! */
> -		if (!iov->m64_single_mode) {
> +		if (!iov->m64_single_mode[i]) {
>  			win = pnv_pci_alloc_m64_bar(phb, iov);
>  			if (win < 0)
>  				goto m64_failed;
> @@ -543,6 +537,8 @@ static int pnv_pci_vf_resource_shift(struct pci_dev *dev, int offset)
>  		res = &dev->resource[i + PCI_IOV_RESOURCES];
>  		if (!res->flags || !res->parent)
>  			continue;
> +		if (iov->m64_single_mode[i])
> +			continue;
>  
>  		/*
>  		 * The actual IOV BAR range is determined by the start address
> @@ -574,6 +570,8 @@ static int pnv_pci_vf_resource_shift(struct pci_dev *dev, int offset)
>  		res = &dev->resource[i + PCI_IOV_RESOURCES];
>  		if (!res->flags || !res->parent)
>  			continue;
> +		if (iov->m64_single_mode[i])
> +			continue;
>  
>  		size = pci_iov_resource_size(dev, i + PCI_IOV_RESOURCES);
>  		res2 = *res;
> @@ -619,8 +617,8 @@ static void pnv_pci_sriov_disable(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>  	/* Release VF PEs */
>  	pnv_ioda_release_vf_PE(pdev);
>  
> -	/* Un-shift the IOV BAR resources */
> -	if (!iov->m64_single_mode)
> +	/* Un-shift the IOV BARs if we need to */
> +	if (iov->need_shift)
>  		pnv_pci_vf_resource_shift(pdev, -base_pe);
>  
>  	/* Release M64 windows */
> @@ -738,9 +736,8 @@ static int pnv_pci_sriov_enable(struct pci_dev *pdev, u16 num_vfs)
>  	 * the IOV BAR according to the PE# allocated to the VFs.
>  	 * Otherwise, the PE# for the VF will conflict with others.
>  	 */
> -	if (!iov->m64_single_mode) {
> -		ret = pnv_pci_vf_resource_shift(pdev,
> -						base_pe->pe_number);
> +	if (iov->need_shift) {
> +		ret = pnv_pci_vf_resource_shift(pdev, base_pe->pe_number);
>  		if (ret)
>  			goto shift_failed;
>  	}
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci.h b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci.h
> index 41a6f4e938e4..902e928c7c22 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci.h
> @@ -243,8 +243,15 @@ struct pnv_iov_data {
>  	/* pointer to the array of VF PEs. num_vfs long*/
>  	struct pnv_ioda_pe *vf_pe_arr;
>  
> -	/* Did we map the VF BARs with single-PE IODA BARs? */
> -	bool    m64_single_mode;
> +	/* Did we map the VF BAR with single-PE IODA BARs? */
> +	bool    m64_single_mode[PCI_SRIOV_NUM_BARS];
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * True if we're using any segmented windows. In that case we need
> +	 * shift the start of the IOV resource the segment corresponding to
> +	 * the allocated PE.
> +	 */
> +	bool    need_shift;
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * Bit mask used to track which m64 windows are used to map the
> -- 
> 2.26.2
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2020-08-01  6:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-07-22  6:57 [PATCH v2 01/16] powernv/pci: Add pci_bus_to_pnvhb() helper Oliver O'Halloran
2020-07-22  6:57 ` [PATCH v2 02/16] powerpc/powernv/pci: Always tear down DMA windows on PE release Oliver O'Halloran
2020-07-22  6:57 ` [PATCH v2 03/16] powerpc/powernv/pci: Add explicit tracking of the DMA setup state Oliver O'Halloran
2020-07-22  6:57 ` [PATCH v2 04/16] powerpc/powernv/pci: Initialise M64 for IODA1 as a 1-1 window Oliver O'Halloran
2020-07-22  6:57 ` [PATCH v2 05/16] powerpc/powernv/sriov: Move SR-IOV into a separate file Oliver O'Halloran
2020-07-22  6:57 ` [PATCH v2 06/16] powerpc/powernv/sriov: Explain how SR-IOV works on PowerNV Oliver O'Halloran
2020-07-22  6:57 ` [PATCH v2 07/16] powerpc/powernv/sriov: Rename truncate_iov Oliver O'Halloran
2020-07-22  6:57 ` [PATCH v2 08/16] powerpc/powernv/sriov: Simplify used window tracking Oliver O'Halloran
2020-07-22  6:57 ` [PATCH v2 09/16] powerpc/powernv/sriov: Factor out M64 BAR setup Oliver O'Halloran
2020-07-22  6:57 ` [PATCH v2 10/16] powerpc/powernv/pci: Refactor pnv_ioda_alloc_pe() Oliver O'Halloran
2020-07-24  5:20   ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2020-07-22  6:57 ` [PATCH v2 11/16] powerpc/powernv/sriov: Drop iov->pe_num_map[] Oliver O'Halloran
2020-07-22  6:57 ` [PATCH v2 12/16] powerpc/powernv/sriov: De-indent setup and teardown Oliver O'Halloran
2020-07-22  6:57 ` [PATCH v2 13/16] powerpc/powernv/sriov: Move M64 BAR allocation into a helper Oliver O'Halloran
2020-07-22  6:57 ` [PATCH v2 14/16] powerpc/powernv/sriov: Refactor M64 BAR setup Oliver O'Halloran
2020-07-22  6:57 ` [PATCH v2 15/16] powerpc/powernv/sriov: Make single PE mode a per-BAR setting Oliver O'Halloran
2020-08-01  6:18   ` Nathan Chancellor [this message]
2020-08-02 13:12     ` Michael Ellerman
2020-08-03  4:46       ` Nathan Chancellor
2020-08-03  5:57         ` Michael Ellerman
2020-08-03 21:00           ` Segher Boessenkool
2020-07-22  6:57 ` [PATCH v2 16/16] powerpc/powernv/sriov: Remove vfs_expanded Oliver O'Halloran
2020-07-27  7:26 ` [PATCH v2 01/16] powernv/pci: Add pci_bus_to_pnvhb() helper Michael Ellerman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200801061823.GA1203340@ubuntu-n2-xlarge-x86 \
    --to=natechancellor@gmail.com \
    --cc=clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=oohall@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).