From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DEC2C4363A for ; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 09:33:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1FD9D206E9 for ; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 09:33:15 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="Gay4USUB" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 1FD9D206E9 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from bilbo.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CKV4p0FZ3zDqNN for ; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 20:33:14 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=kernel.org (client-ip=198.145.29.99; helo=mail.kernel.org; envelope-from=rppt@kernel.org; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=default header.b=Gay4USUB; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CKV2t2SsnzDqKb for ; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 20:31:34 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from kernel.org (unknown [87.70.96.83]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 04E07223EA; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 09:31:15 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1603704688; bh=UPPnXviZXmutWijYpQ9tn9fnLcQibcRuGcgbK3gvCBw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=Gay4USUBBIxHqVxLVBTGdS6UR/Xrw069y1WeVP2Fs7F0gpT/fVrp1lv3pe8IbHpLe RoEp88v8LxwsuyzDFoKwK7DyX3p6WzNTV//0uHT1Jgfz1rDyGmOBg1EeMCMd5+X4tM uKwPfXMr4FM1bIOQXZSKgycAvE2mT9oKkX0LymH4= Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2020 11:31:10 +0200 From: Mike Rapoport To: "Edgecombe, Rick P" Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] arch, mm: make kernel_page_present() always available Message-ID: <20201026093110.GC1154158@kernel.org> References: <20201025101555.3057-1-rppt@kernel.org> <20201025101555.3057-5-rppt@kernel.org> <979889bf987fdc7268a973fe7398198bfad1644f.camel@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <979889bf987fdc7268a973fe7398198bfad1644f.camel@intel.com> X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: "david@redhat.com" , "peterz@infradead.org" , "catalin.marinas@arm.com" , "dave.hansen@linux.intel.com" , "linux-mm@kvack.org" , "paulus@samba.org" , "pavel@ucw.cz" , "hpa@zytor.com" , "sparclinux@vger.kernel.org" , "cl@linux.com" , "will@kernel.org" , "linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-s390@vger.kernel.org" , "x86@kernel.org" , "rppt@linux.ibm.com" , "borntraeger@de.ibm.com" , "mingo@redhat.com" , "rientjes@google.com" , "Brown, Len" , "aou@eecs.berkeley.edu" , "gor@linux.ibm.com" , "linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" , "hca@linux.ibm.com" , "bp@alien8.de" , "luto@kernel.org" , "paul.walmsley@sifive.com" , "kirill@shutemov.name" , "tglx@linutronix.de" , "akpm@linux-foundation.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "rjw@rjwysocki.net" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "penberg@kernel.org" , "palmer@dabbelt.com" , "iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com" , "linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" , "davem@davemloft.net" Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 12:54:01AM +0000, Edgecombe, Rick P wrote: > On Sun, 2020-10-25 at 12:15 +0200, Mike Rapoport wrote: > > index 7f248fc45317..16f878c26667 100644 > > --- a/arch/x86/mm/pat/set_memory.c > > +++ b/arch/x86/mm/pat/set_memory.c > > @@ -2228,7 +2228,6 @@ void __kernel_map_pages(struct page *page, int > > numpages, int enable) > > } > > #endif /* CONFIG_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC */ > > > > -#ifdef CONFIG_HIBERNATION > > bool kernel_page_present(struct page *page) > > { > > unsigned int level; > > @@ -2240,7 +2239,6 @@ bool kernel_page_present(struct page *page) > > pte = lookup_address((unsigned long)page_address(page), > > &level); > > return (pte_val(*pte) & _PAGE_PRESENT); > > } > > -#endif /* CONFIG_HIBERNATION */ > > This is only used by hibernate today right? Makes sense that it should > return a correct answer if someone starts to use it without looking too > closely at the header. But could we just remove the default static > inline return true implementation and let the linker fail if someone > starts to use it outside hibernate? Then we could leave it compiled out > until then. Hmm, I'm not sure I follow you here. We'd need some stub for architectures that have ARCH_HIBERNATION_POSSIBLE and do not have CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_SET_DIRECT_MAP. I don't see how the kernel would compile for ppc or sparc with hibernation enabled if I remove the default implementation. > Also it looks like riscv does not have ARCH_HIBERNATION_POSSIBLE so the > new function added here couldn't be used yet. You could also just let > the linker catch it if riscv ever enables hibernate? -- Sincerely yours, Mike.