From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <SRS0=J0gu=EM=lists.ozlabs.org=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@kernel.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on
	aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID,
	DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,
	SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0
Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99])
	by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAC35C2D0A3
	for <linuxppc-dev@archiver.kernel.org>; Fri,  6 Nov 2020 14:30:12 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8CDBA2078B
	for <linuxppc-dev@archiver.kernel.org>; Fri,  6 Nov 2020 14:30:11 +0000 (UTC)
Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org;
	dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=suse.com header.i=@suse.com header.b="hOSy8tf6"
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 8CDBA2078B
Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=suse.com
Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org
Received: from bilbo.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3])
	by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CSN8J20VMzDqCq
	for <linuxppc-dev@archiver.kernel.org>; Sat,  7 Nov 2020 01:30:08 +1100 (AEDT)
Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized)
 smtp.mailfrom=suse.com (client-ip=195.135.220.15; helo=mx2.suse.de;
 envelope-from=pmladek@suse.com; receiver=<UNKNOWN>)
Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org;
 dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=suse.com
Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key;
 unprotected) header.d=suse.com header.i=@suse.com header.a=rsa-sha256
 header.s=susede1 header.b=hOSy8tf6; dkim-atps=neutral
Received: from mx2.suse.de (mx2.suse.de [195.135.220.15])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CSN5Y029bzDrLZ
 for <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>; Sat,  7 Nov 2020 01:27:43 +1100 (AEDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.com; s=susede1;
 t=1604672860;
 h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id:
 to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type:
 in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references;
 bh=fneYivF7KPk5Vezwqp16bHvlG7pQia60PP+ozhIKNOI=;
 b=hOSy8tf6Xv9bxsLj3BRpsgcu/m8tXPh77G9b08Scucev/08pfZ/oZN7WOboqt1Phltz0oY
 EY+Z7IhgTgZK8/cheL0CPQ+pGMcTvUW7Ysp6ShK8LBZpwqpEn7fzXD6giDnRBpzEP5qAeT
 BwsA/u4RxQJT0sh1JOGSdIWHppyWK2U=
Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.221.27])
 by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBFB7ABCC;
 Fri,  6 Nov 2020 14:27:39 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2020 15:27:38 +0100
From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/11 v3] ftrace: Add recording of functions that caused
 recursion
Message-ID: <20201106142738.GX20201@alley>
References: <20201106023235.367190737@goodmis.org>
 <20201106023548.102375687@goodmis.org>
 <20201106131317.GW20201@alley>
 <20201106084131.7dfc3a30@gandalf.local.home>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20201106084131.7dfc3a30@gandalf.local.home>
X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List <linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.ozlabs.org/options/linuxppc-dev>,
 <mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@lists.ozlabs.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>
List-Help: <mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@lists.ozlabs.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev>,
 <mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@lists.ozlabs.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: Anton Vorontsov <anton@enomsg.org>, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
 Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
 Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
 "James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com>,
 Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
 live-patching@vger.kernel.org, Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz>,
 Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
 Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@redhat.com>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
 Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>,
 Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>, x86@kernel.org, linux-csky@vger.kernel.org,
 Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
 Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>, Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
 Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>, Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org>,
 Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>,
 Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
 linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
 Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>, Colin Cross <ccross@android.com>,
 Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
 linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org
Sender: "Linuxppc-dev"
 <linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org>

On Fri 2020-11-06 08:41:31, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Fri, 6 Nov 2020 14:13:17 +0100
> Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> wrote:
> 
> > JFYI, the code reading and writing the cache looks good to me.
> > 
> > It is still possible that some entries might stay unused (filled
> > with zeroes) but it should be hard to hit in practice. It
> > is good enough from my POV.
> 
> You mean the part that was commented?

Yeah, it is the comment problem when nr_records is pushed forward.

> > 
> > I do not give Reviewed-by tag just because I somehow do not have power
> > to review the entire patch carefully enough at the moment.
> 
> No problem. Thanks for looking at it.
> 
> I'm adding a link to this thread, so if someone wants proof you helped out
> on this code, you can have them follow the links ;-)
> 
> Anyway, even if I push this to linux-next where I stop rebasing code
> (because of test coverage), I do rebase for adding tags. So if you ever get
> around at looking at this code, I can add that tag later (before the next
> merge window), or if you find something, I could fix it with a new patch and
> give you a Reported-by.

Good to know.

Best Regards,
Petr