From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53844C433B4 for ; Tue, 6 Apr 2021 11:51:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 78543613A3 for ; Tue, 6 Apr 2021 11:51:37 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 78543613A3 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=alpha.franken.de Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FF5Th0VtCz30Bp for ; Tue, 6 Apr 2021 21:51:36 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.helo=elvis.franken.de (client-ip=193.175.24.41; helo=elvis.franken.de; envelope-from=tsbogend@alpha.franken.de; receiver=) Received: from elvis.franken.de (elvis.franken.de [193.175.24.41]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FF5TK4nBTz2yyx for ; Tue, 6 Apr 2021 21:51:15 +1000 (AEST) Received: from uucp (helo=alpha) by elvis.franken.de with local-bsmtp (Exim 3.36 #1) id 1lTkEe-00062N-00; Tue, 06 Apr 2021 13:51:08 +0200 Received: by alpha.franken.de (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 639BBC210F; Tue, 6 Apr 2021 13:36:38 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2021 13:36:38 +0200 From: Thomas Bogendoerfer To: Marc Zyngier Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/9] mips: netlogic: Use irq_domain_simple_ops for XLP PIC Message-ID: <20210406113638.GA8277@alpha.franken.de> References: <20210406093557.1073423-1-maz@kernel.org> <20210406093557.1073423-7-maz@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210406093557.1073423-7-maz@kernel.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Rich Felker , Yoshinori Sato , linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, Robert Jarzmik , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Haojian Zhuang , linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Thomas Gleixner , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Daniel Mack Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On Tue, Apr 06, 2021 at 10:35:54AM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote: > Use the generic irq_domain_simple_ops structure instead of > a home-grown one. > > Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier > --- > arch/mips/netlogic/common/irq.c | 6 +----- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-) Acked-by: Thomas Bogendoerfer -- Crap can work. Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessarily a good idea. [ RFC1925, 2.3 ]