From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-16.6 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 070E2C433ED for ; Wed, 5 May 2021 19:18:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A3AF6613C4 for ; Wed, 5 May 2021 19:18:01 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org A3AF6613C4 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Fb61L3rqZz3bc2 for ; Thu, 6 May 2021 05:17:58 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=HJlYbOBM; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=linux.ibm.com (client-ip=148.163.158.5; helo=mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com; envelope-from=vaibhav@linux.ibm.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=HJlYbOBM; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.158.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Fb60q4dcjz2yxT for ; Thu, 6 May 2021 05:17:31 +1000 (AEST) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098419.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.43/8.16.0.43) with SMTP id 145J3hOF074384; Wed, 5 May 2021 15:17:23 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : mime-version : content-transfer-encoding; s=pp1; bh=CG2al3hSqt/RfzfZJSJhkYslBqi2MkHyCpd7i0W29mo=; b=HJlYbOBMtxdzU3L1u27J8E10jx9Dp6C+KZWiQwpfhMOX/fAppNCakRk+C1Lp5CMI9/K5 yVEti1HcfuKCE8Eqs3n9JyT6fULe0Sfj6l0B3Ieh/u/8UHf2cPwp86BrUwh/KKGvEXDa 9MvGZgifcAlSbt1Y+gLJW2zutq9cb1ddtBvdPF9VYJPHJfmly7W7wYF4EqZ4k6mVduk6 Z3hFxOA4YUZQkAnElgFC5nQnNEkU/K+xci6nK8uKuSNQT4BhrTqvKGY9q0nSBC6zYSfs VWcwN3DVWFyMMeE6ZWZiCbSyfyOcHIJBzJjaUncJHWeqWEnc82IDR7bHkSpkX9BY/FT4 Wg== Received: from ppma03ams.nl.ibm.com (62.31.33a9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.51.49.98]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 38by55bu98-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 05 May 2021 15:17:23 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma03ams.nl.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma03ams.nl.ibm.com (8.16.0.43/8.16.0.43) with SMTP id 145Is45b001829; Wed, 5 May 2021 19:17:21 GMT Received: from b06avi18626390.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (b06avi18626390.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.26.192]) by ppma03ams.nl.ibm.com with ESMTP id 38bedxrfj2-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 05 May 2021 19:17:20 +0000 Received: from d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.61]) by b06avi18626390.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 145JGq1A25887036 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 5 May 2021 19:16:52 GMT Received: from d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D12511C050; Wed, 5 May 2021 19:17:18 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1676E11C054; Wed, 5 May 2021 19:17:15 +0000 (GMT) Received: from vajain21.in.ibm.com (unknown [9.85.88.241]) by d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with SMTP; Wed, 5 May 2021 19:17:14 +0000 (GMT) Received: by vajain21.in.ibm.com (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Thu, 06 May 2021 00:47:13 +0530 From: Vaibhav Jain To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org Subject: [PATCH] powerpc/papr_scm: Make 'perf_stats' invisible if perf-stats unavailable Date: Thu, 6 May 2021 00:47:08 +0530 Message-Id: <20210505191708.51939-1-vaibhav@linux.ibm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.31.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-GUID: n8oPt03_YxPuEPOCAflDcEE40Kfwf24g X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: n8oPt03_YxPuEPOCAflDcEE40Kfwf24g X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.391, 18.0.761 definitions=2021-05-05_09:2021-05-05, 2021-05-05 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 mlxscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 phishscore=0 suspectscore=0 spamscore=0 priorityscore=1501 adultscore=8 mlxlogscore=999 malwarescore=0 impostorscore=0 clxscore=1015 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2104060000 definitions=main-2105050130 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Santosh Sivaraj , "Aneesh Kumar K . V" , Vaibhav Jain , Dan Williams , Ira Weiny Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" In case performance stats for an nvdimm are not available, reading the 'perf_stats' sysfs file returns an -ENOENT error. A better approach is to make the 'perf_stats' file entirely invisible to indicate that performance stats for an nvdimm are unavailable. So this patch updates 'papr_nd_attribute_group' to add a 'is_visible' callback implemented as newly introduced 'papr_nd_attribute_visible()' that returns an appropriate mode in case performance stats aren't supported in a given nvdimm. Also the initialization of 'papr_scm_priv.stat_buffer_len' is moved from papr_scm_nvdimm_init() to papr_scm_probe() so that it value is available when 'papr_nd_attribute_visible()' is called during nvdimm initialization. Fixes: 2d02bf835e57('powerpc/papr_scm: Fetch nvdimm performance stats from PHYP') Signed-off-by: Vaibhav Jain --- arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/papr_scm.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++------- 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/papr_scm.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/papr_scm.c index 12f1513f0fca..90f0af8fefe8 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/papr_scm.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/papr_scm.c @@ -907,6 +907,20 @@ static ssize_t flags_show(struct device *dev, } DEVICE_ATTR_RO(flags); +umode_t papr_nd_attribute_visible(struct kobject *kobj, struct attribute *attr, + int n) +{ + struct device *dev = container_of(kobj, typeof(*dev), kobj); + struct nvdimm *nvdimm = to_nvdimm(dev); + struct papr_scm_priv *p = nvdimm_provider_data(nvdimm); + + /* For if perf-stats not available remove perf_stats sysfs */ + if (attr == &dev_attr_perf_stats.attr && p->stat_buffer_len == 0) + return 0; + + return attr->mode; +} + /* papr_scm specific dimm attributes */ static struct attribute *papr_nd_attributes[] = { &dev_attr_flags.attr, @@ -916,6 +930,7 @@ static struct attribute *papr_nd_attributes[] = { static struct attribute_group papr_nd_attribute_group = { .name = "papr", + .is_visible = papr_nd_attribute_visible, .attrs = papr_nd_attributes, }; @@ -931,7 +946,6 @@ static int papr_scm_nvdimm_init(struct papr_scm_priv *p) struct nd_region_desc ndr_desc; unsigned long dimm_flags; int target_nid, online_nid; - ssize_t stat_size; p->bus_desc.ndctl = papr_scm_ndctl; p->bus_desc.module = THIS_MODULE; @@ -1016,16 +1030,6 @@ static int papr_scm_nvdimm_init(struct papr_scm_priv *p) list_add_tail(&p->region_list, &papr_nd_regions); mutex_unlock(&papr_ndr_lock); - /* Try retriving the stat buffer and see if its supported */ - stat_size = drc_pmem_query_stats(p, NULL, 0); - if (stat_size > 0) { - p->stat_buffer_len = stat_size; - dev_dbg(&p->pdev->dev, "Max perf-stat size %lu-bytes\n", - p->stat_buffer_len); - } else { - dev_info(&p->pdev->dev, "Dimm performance stats unavailable\n"); - } - return 0; err: nvdimm_bus_unregister(p->bus); @@ -1102,6 +1106,7 @@ static int papr_scm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) u64 blocks, block_size; struct papr_scm_priv *p; const char *uuid_str; + ssize_t stat_size; u64 uuid[2]; int rc; @@ -1179,6 +1184,16 @@ static int papr_scm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) p->res.name = pdev->name; p->res.flags = IORESOURCE_MEM; + /* Try retriving the stat buffer and see if its supported */ + stat_size = drc_pmem_query_stats(p, NULL, 0); + if (stat_size > 0) { + p->stat_buffer_len = stat_size; + dev_dbg(&p->pdev->dev, "Max perf-stat size %lu-bytes\n", + p->stat_buffer_len); + } else { + dev_info(&p->pdev->dev, "Dimm performance stats unavailable\n"); + } + rc = papr_scm_nvdimm_init(p); if (rc) goto err2; -- 2.31.1