linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, mpe@ellerman.id.au
Cc: Nathan Lynch <nathanl@linux.ibm.com>,
	"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>,
	Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>,
	kbuild-all@lists.01.org,
	David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 4/6] powerpc/pseries: Consolidate different NUMA distance update code paths
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2021 04:40:56 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <202106290413.yYgDdKvn-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210628151117.545935-5-aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 6287 bytes --]

Hi "Aneesh,

I love your patch! Yet something to improve:

[auto build test ERROR on powerpc/next]
[also build test ERROR on v5.13 next-20210628]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch]

url:    https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Aneesh-Kumar-K-V/Add-support-for-FORM2-associativity/20210628-231546
base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/powerpc/linux.git next
config: powerpc-randconfig-r024-20210628 (attached as .config)
compiler: powerpc64-linux-gcc (GCC) 9.3.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
        wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
        chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
        # https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commit/fcbc8b19e99b1cf44fde904817f19616c6baecdb
        git remote add linux-review https://github.com/0day-ci/linux
        git fetch --no-tags linux-review Aneesh-Kumar-K-V/Add-support-for-FORM2-associativity/20210628-231546
        git checkout fcbc8b19e99b1cf44fde904817f19616c6baecdb
        # save the attached .config to linux build tree
        COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=gcc-9.3.0 make.cross ARCH=powerpc 

If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>

All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):

   arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c:298:6: warning: no previous prototype for 'update_numa_distance' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
     298 | void update_numa_distance(struct device_node *node)
         |      ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c: In function 'parse_numa_properties':
>> arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c:809:7: error: implicit declaration of function '__vphn_get_associativity'; did you mean 'of_get_associativity'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
     809 |   if (__vphn_get_associativity(i, vphn_assoc) == 0) {
         |       ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
         |       of_get_associativity
   cc1: some warnings being treated as errors


vim +809 arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c

   771	
   772	static int __init parse_numa_properties(void)
   773	{
   774		struct device_node *memory;
   775		int default_nid = 0;
   776		unsigned long i;
   777		const __be32 *associativity;
   778	
   779		if (numa_enabled == 0) {
   780			printk(KERN_WARNING "NUMA disabled by user\n");
   781			return -1;
   782		}
   783	
   784		primary_domain_index = find_primary_domain_index();
   785	
   786		if (primary_domain_index < 0) {
   787			/*
   788			 * if we fail to parse primary_domain_index from device tree
   789			 * mark the numa disabled, boot with numa disabled.
   790			 */
   791			numa_enabled = false;
   792			return primary_domain_index;
   793		}
   794	
   795		dbg("NUMA associativity depth for CPU/Memory: %d\n", primary_domain_index);
   796	
   797		/*
   798		 * Even though we connect cpus to numa domains later in SMP
   799		 * init, we need to know the node ids now. This is because
   800		 * each node to be onlined must have NODE_DATA etc backing it.
   801		 */
   802		for_each_present_cpu(i) {
   803			__be32 vphn_assoc[VPHN_ASSOC_BUFSIZE];
   804			struct device_node *cpu;
   805			int nid = NUMA_NO_NODE;
   806	
   807			memset(vphn_assoc, 0, VPHN_ASSOC_BUFSIZE * sizeof(__be32));
   808	
 > 809			if (__vphn_get_associativity(i, vphn_assoc) == 0) {
   810				nid = associativity_to_nid(vphn_assoc);
   811				__initialize_form1_numa_distance(vphn_assoc);
   812			} else {
   813	
   814				/*
   815				 * Don't fall back to default_nid yet -- we will plug
   816				 * cpus into nodes once the memory scan has discovered
   817				 * the topology.
   818				 */
   819				cpu = of_get_cpu_node(i, NULL);
   820				BUG_ON(!cpu);
   821	
   822				associativity = of_get_associativity(cpu);
   823				if (associativity) {
   824					nid = associativity_to_nid(associativity);
   825					__initialize_form1_numa_distance(associativity);
   826				}
   827				of_node_put(cpu);
   828			}
   829	
   830			node_set_online(nid);
   831		}
   832	
   833		get_n_mem_cells(&n_mem_addr_cells, &n_mem_size_cells);
   834	
   835		for_each_node_by_type(memory, "memory") {
   836			unsigned long start;
   837			unsigned long size;
   838			int nid;
   839			int ranges;
   840			const __be32 *memcell_buf;
   841			unsigned int len;
   842	
   843			memcell_buf = of_get_property(memory,
   844				"linux,usable-memory", &len);
   845			if (!memcell_buf || len <= 0)
   846				memcell_buf = of_get_property(memory, "reg", &len);
   847			if (!memcell_buf || len <= 0)
   848				continue;
   849	
   850			/* ranges in cell */
   851			ranges = (len >> 2) / (n_mem_addr_cells + n_mem_size_cells);
   852	new_range:
   853			/* these are order-sensitive, and modify the buffer pointer */
   854			start = read_n_cells(n_mem_addr_cells, &memcell_buf);
   855			size = read_n_cells(n_mem_size_cells, &memcell_buf);
   856	
   857			/*
   858			 * Assumption: either all memory nodes or none will
   859			 * have associativity properties.  If none, then
   860			 * everything goes to default_nid.
   861			 */
   862			associativity = of_get_associativity(memory);
   863			if (associativity) {
   864				nid = associativity_to_nid(associativity);
   865				__initialize_form1_numa_distance(associativity);
   866			} else
   867				nid = default_nid;
   868	
   869			fake_numa_create_new_node(((start + size) >> PAGE_SHIFT), &nid);
   870			node_set_online(nid);
   871	
   872			size = numa_enforce_memory_limit(start, size);
   873			if (size)
   874				memblock_set_node(start, size, &memblock.memory, nid);
   875	
   876			if (--ranges)
   877				goto new_range;
   878		}
   879	
   880		/*
   881		 * Now do the same thing for each MEMBLOCK listed in the
   882		 * ibm,dynamic-memory property in the
   883		 * ibm,dynamic-reconfiguration-memory node.
   884		 */
   885		memory = of_find_node_by_path("/ibm,dynamic-reconfiguration-memory");
   886		if (memory) {
   887			walk_drmem_lmbs(memory, NULL, numa_setup_drmem_lmb);
   888			of_node_put(memory);
   889		}
   890	
   891		return 0;
   892	}
   893	

---
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@lists.01.org

[-- Attachment #2: .config.gz --]
[-- Type: application/gzip, Size: 43062 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-06-28 20:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-06-28 15:11 [PATCH v5 0/6] Add support for FORM2 associativity Aneesh Kumar K.V
2021-06-28 15:11 ` [PATCH v5 1/6] powerpc/pseries: rename min_common_depth to primary_domain_index Aneesh Kumar K.V
2021-07-22  1:59   ` David Gibson
2021-07-22  2:36     ` David Gibson
2021-07-22  5:17       ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2021-07-26  2:28         ` David Gibson
2021-06-28 15:11 ` [PATCH v5 2/6] powerpc/pseries: rename distance_ref_points_depth to max_associativity_domain_index Aneesh Kumar K.V
2021-07-22  0:59   ` David Gibson
2021-07-22  1:19     ` David Gibson
2021-06-28 15:11 ` [PATCH v5 3/6] powerpc/pseries: Rename TYPE1_AFFINITY to FORM1_AFFINITY Aneesh Kumar K.V
2021-06-28 15:11 ` [PATCH v5 4/6] powerpc/pseries: Consolidate different NUMA distance update code paths Aneesh Kumar K.V
2021-06-28 20:21   ` kernel test robot
2021-06-28 20:40   ` kernel test robot [this message]
2021-07-22  1:40   ` David Gibson
2021-07-22  7:07     ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2021-07-26  2:37       ` David Gibson
2021-07-27  3:32         ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2021-07-27  5:59           ` David Gibson
2021-06-28 15:11 ` [PATCH v5 5/6] powerpc/pseries: Add a helper for form1 cpu distance Aneesh Kumar K.V
2021-07-22  1:42   ` David Gibson
2021-07-22  7:09     ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2021-07-26  2:38       ` David Gibson
2021-06-28 15:11 ` [PATCH v5 6/6] powerpc/pseries: Add support for FORM2 associativity Aneesh Kumar K.V
2021-07-22  2:28   ` David Gibson
2021-07-22  7:34     ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2021-07-26  2:41       ` David Gibson
2021-07-13 14:27 ` [PATCH v5 0/6] " Daniel Henrique Barboza
2021-07-13 14:30   ` Aneesh Kumar K.V

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=202106290413.yYgDdKvn-lkp@intel.com \
    --to=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=danielhb413@gmail.com \
    --cc=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
    --cc=kbuild-all@lists.01.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=nathanl@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).