From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDB25C433EF for ; Sat, 9 Oct 2021 11:49:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 88CC960F55 for ; Sat, 9 Oct 2021 11:49:09 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org 88CC960F55 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.alibaba.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lists.ozlabs.org Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4HRNcz6ljlz2yWr for ; Sat, 9 Oct 2021 22:49:07 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=linux.alibaba.com (client-ip=115.124.30.57; helo=out30-57.freemail.mail.aliyun.com; envelope-from=xianting.tian@linux.alibaba.com; receiver=) Received: from out30-57.freemail.mail.aliyun.com (out30-57.freemail.mail.aliyun.com [115.124.30.57]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4HRNcX2Fypz2xKP for ; Sat, 9 Oct 2021 22:48:42 +1100 (AEDT) X-Alimail-AntiSpam: AC=PASS; BC=-1|-1; BR=01201311R181e4; CH=green; DM=||false|; DS=||; FP=0|-1|-1|-1|0|-1|-1|-1; HT=e01e01424; MF=xianting.tian@linux.alibaba.com; NM=1; PH=DS; RN=10; SR=0; TI=SMTPD_---0Ur6bLbj_1633780115; Received: from localhost(mailfrom:xianting.tian@linux.alibaba.com fp:SMTPD_---0Ur6bLbj_1633780115) by smtp.aliyun-inc.com(127.0.0.1); Sat, 09 Oct 2021 19:48:35 +0800 From: Xianting Tian To: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, jirislaby@kernel.org, amit@kernel.org, arnd@arndb.de, osandov@fb.com Subject: [PATCH v10 1/3] tty: hvc: use correct dma alignment size Date: Sat, 9 Oct 2021 19:48:27 +0800 Message-Id: <20211009114829.1071021-2-xianting.tian@linux.alibaba.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 In-Reply-To: <20211009114829.1071021-1-xianting.tian@linux.alibaba.com> References: <20211009114829.1071021-1-xianting.tian@linux.alibaba.com> X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Xianting Tian , shile.zhang@linux.alibaba.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" Use L1_CACHE_BYTES as the dma alignment size, use 'sizeof(long)' is wrong. Signed-off-by: Xianting Tian Reviewed-by: Shile Zhang --- drivers/tty/hvc/hvc_console.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/tty/hvc/hvc_console.c b/drivers/tty/hvc/hvc_console.c index 5bb8c4e44..5957ab728 100644 --- a/drivers/tty/hvc/hvc_console.c +++ b/drivers/tty/hvc/hvc_console.c @@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ #define N_OUTBUF 16 #define N_INBUF 16 -#define __ALIGNED__ __attribute__((__aligned__(sizeof(long)))) +#define __ALIGNED__ __attribute__((__aligned__(L1_CACHE_BYTES))) static struct tty_driver *hvc_driver; static struct task_struct *hvc_task; -- 2.17.1