linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stefan Berger <stefanb@linux.ibm.com>
To: kexec@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Cc: nayna@linux.ibm.com, nasastry@in.ibm.com,
	Vaibhav Jain <vaibhav@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 1/5] of: check previous kernel's ima-kexec-buffer against memory bounds
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2022 22:25:59 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220701022603.31076-2-stefanb@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220701022603.31076-1-stefanb@linux.ibm.com>

From: Vaibhav Jain <vaibhav@linux.ibm.com>

Presently ima_get_kexec_buffer() doesn't check if the previous kernel's
ima-kexec-buffer lies outside the addressable memory range. This can result
in a kernel panic if the new kernel is booted with 'mem=X' arg and the
ima-kexec-buffer was allocated beyond that range by the previous kernel.
The panic is usually of the form below:

$ sudo kexec --initrd initrd vmlinux --append='mem=16G'

<snip>
 BUG: Unable to handle kernel data access on read at 0xc000c01fff7f0000
 Faulting instruction address: 0xc000000000837974
 Oops: Kernel access of bad area, sig: 11 [#1]
<snip>
 NIP [c000000000837974] ima_restore_measurement_list+0x94/0x6c0
 LR [c00000000083b55c] ima_load_kexec_buffer+0xac/0x160
 Call Trace:
 [c00000000371fa80] [c00000000083b55c] ima_load_kexec_buffer+0xac/0x160
 [c00000000371fb00] [c0000000020512c4] ima_init+0x80/0x108
 [c00000000371fb70] [c0000000020514dc] init_ima+0x4c/0x120
 [c00000000371fbf0] [c000000000012240] do_one_initcall+0x60/0x2c0
 [c00000000371fcc0] [c000000002004ad0] kernel_init_freeable+0x344/0x3ec
 [c00000000371fda0] [c0000000000128a4] kernel_init+0x34/0x1b0
 [c00000000371fe10] [c00000000000ce64] ret_from_kernel_thread+0x5c/0x64
 Instruction dump:
 f92100b8 f92100c0 90e10090 910100a0 4182050c 282a0017 3bc00000 40810330
 7c0802a6 fb610198 7c9b2378 f80101d0 <a1240000> 2c090001 40820614 e9240010
 ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---

Fix this issue by checking returned PFN range of previous kernel's
ima-kexec-buffer with page_is_ram() to ensure correct memory bounds.

Fixes: 467d27824920 ("powerpc: ima: get the kexec buffer passed by the previous kernel")
[ Several tags removed; for testing by krobot ]
Signed-off-by: Vaibhav Jain <vaibhav@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220531041446.3334259-1-vaibhav@linux.ibm.com
---
 drivers/of/kexec.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/of/kexec.c b/drivers/of/kexec.c
index 8d374cc552be..91b04b04eec4 100644
--- a/drivers/of/kexec.c
+++ b/drivers/of/kexec.c
@@ -126,6 +126,7 @@ int ima_get_kexec_buffer(void **addr, size_t *size)
 {
 	int ret, len;
 	unsigned long tmp_addr;
+	unsigned long start_pfn, end_pfn;
 	size_t tmp_size;
 	const void *prop;
 
@@ -140,6 +141,22 @@ int ima_get_kexec_buffer(void **addr, size_t *size)
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
 
+	/* Do some sanity on the returned size for the ima-kexec buffer */
+	if (!tmp_size)
+		return -ENOENT;
+
+	/*
+	 * Calculate the PFNs for the buffer and ensure
+	 * they are with in addressable memory.
+	 */
+	start_pfn = PHYS_PFN(tmp_addr);
+	end_pfn = PHYS_PFN(tmp_addr + tmp_size - 1);
+	if (!page_is_ram(start_pfn) || !page_is_ram(end_pfn)) {
+		pr_warn("IMA buffer at 0x%lx, size = 0x%zx beyond memory\n",
+			tmp_addr, tmp_size);
+		return -EINVAL;
+	}
+
 	*addr = __va(tmp_addr);
 	*size = tmp_size;
 
-- 
2.35.1


  reply	other threads:[~2022-07-01  2:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-07-01  2:25 [PATCH v4 0/5] tpm: Preserve TPM measurement log across kexec (ppc64) Stefan Berger
2022-07-01  2:25 ` Stefan Berger [this message]
2022-07-01  2:26 ` [PATCH v4 2/5] drivers: of: kexec ima: Support 32-bit platforms Stefan Berger
2022-07-01  2:26 ` [PATCH v4 3/5] tpm: of: Make of-tree specific function commonly available Stefan Berger
2022-07-11  0:01   ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-07-01  2:26 ` [PATCH v4 4/5] of: kexec: Refactor IMA buffer related functions to make them reusable Stefan Berger
2022-07-05 22:46   ` Mimi Zohar
2022-07-06 14:00     ` Jonathan McDowell
2022-07-06 15:06       ` Stefan Berger
2022-07-01  2:26 ` [PATCH v4 5/5] tpm/kexec: Duplicate TPM measurement log in of-tree for kexec Stefan Berger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220701022603.31076-2-stefanb@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=stefanb@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=nasastry@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=nayna@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=vaibhav@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).