linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
To: "Pali Rohár" <pali@kernel.org>
Cc: "Marek Behún" <kabel@kernel.org>,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, "Arınç ÜNAL" <arinc.unal@arinc9.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] powerpc: dts: remove label = "cpu" from DSA dt-binding
Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2022 17:44:00 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221201234400.GA1692656-robh@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221201173902.zrtpeq4mkk3i3vpk@pali>

On Thu, Dec 01, 2022 at 06:39:02PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Thursday 01 December 2022 21:40:03 Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > Arınç ÜNAL <arinc.unal@arinc9.com> writes:
> > > This is not used by the DSA dt-binding, so remove it from all devicetrees.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Arınç ÜNAL <arinc.unal@arinc9.com>
> > > ---
> > >  arch/powerpc/boot/dts/turris1x.dts | 2 --
> > >  1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > Adding Pali to Cc.
> > 
> > These were only recently updated in commit:
> > 
> >   8bf056f57f1d ("powerpc: dts: turris1x.dts: Fix labels in DSA cpu port nodes")
> > 
> > Which said:
> > 
> >   DSA cpu port node has to be marked with "cpu" label.
> > 
> > But if the binding doesn't use them then I'm confused why they needed to
> > be updated.
> > 
> > cheers
> 
> I was told by Marek (CCed) that DSA port connected to CPU should have
> label "cpu" and not "cpu<number>". Modern way for specifying CPU port is
> by defining reference to network device, which there is already (&enet1
> and &enet0). So that change just "fixed" incorrect naming cpu0 and cpu1.
> 
> So probably linux kernel does not need label = "cpu" in DTS anymore. But
> this is not the reason to remove this property. Linux kernel does not
> use lot of other nodes and properties too... Device tree should describe
> hardware and not its usage in Linux. "label" property is valid in device
> tree and it exactly describes what or where is this node connected. And
> it may be used for other systems.
> 
> So I do not see a point in removing "label" properties from turris1x.dts
> file, nor from any other dts file.

Well, it seems like a bit of an abuse of 'label' to me. 'label' should 
be aligned with a sticker or other identifier identifying something to a 
human. Software should never care what the value of 'label' is.

Rob

  reply	other threads:[~2022-12-01 23:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-11-30 14:10 [PATCH 0/5] remove label = "cpu" from DSA dt-binding Arınç ÜNAL
2022-11-30 14:10 ` [PATCH 1/5] dt-bindings: net: qca,ar71xx: remove label = "cpu" from examples Arınç ÜNAL
2022-12-01  6:13   ` Oleksij Rempel
2022-12-01 23:46   ` Rob Herring
2022-11-30 14:10 ` [PATCH 2/5] arm: dts: remove label = "cpu" from DSA dt-binding Arınç ÜNAL
2022-11-30 14:51   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2022-12-01  6:20   ` Oleksij Rempel
2022-12-01 22:34   ` Bjorn Andersson
2022-12-04 21:31   ` Linus Walleij
2022-12-05 20:10   ` Jernej Škrabec
2022-11-30 14:10 ` [PATCH 3/5] arm64: " Arınç ÜNAL
2022-11-30 18:40   ` Heiko Stübner
2022-11-30 14:10 ` [PATCH 4/5] mips: " Arınç ÜNAL
2022-12-01  6:04   ` Sergio Paracuellos
2022-12-01  6:13   ` Oleksij Rempel
2022-12-01 10:53   ` Thomas Bogendoerfer
2022-11-30 14:10 ` [PATCH 5/5] powerpc: " Arınç ÜNAL
2022-12-01 10:40   ` Michael Ellerman
2022-12-01 17:39     ` Pali Rohár
2022-12-01 23:44       ` Rob Herring [this message]
2022-12-02 19:35         ` Pali Rohár
2022-12-04 18:59           ` Vladimir Oltean
2022-12-05 19:15             ` Arınç ÜNAL
2022-12-07 13:13               ` Vladimir Oltean
2022-11-30 15:55 ` [PATCH 0/5] " Andrew Lunn
2022-11-30 17:22   ` Arınç ÜNAL
2022-12-01 10:42     ` Michael Ellerman
2022-12-01 11:37       ` Arınç ÜNAL
2022-12-01  9:14 ` Arınç ÜNAL
2022-12-02  4:10 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20221201234400.GA1692656-robh@kernel.org \
    --to=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=arinc.unal@arinc9.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kabel@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pali@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).