From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A7226C636D3 for ; Tue, 31 Jan 2023 06:41:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4P5b6d1M1kz3cLr for ; Tue, 31 Jan 2023 17:41:13 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=Ejt/GsLa; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=linux.ibm.com (client-ip=148.163.156.1; helo=mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com; envelope-from=ajd@linux.ibm.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=Ejt/GsLa; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.156.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4P5b5b23Mhz2yXL for ; Tue, 31 Jan 2023 17:40:18 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098404.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.17.1.19/8.17.1.19) with ESMTP id 30V6EFNG003372; Tue, 31 Jan 2023 06:40:12 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : in-reply-to : references : mime-version : content-transfer-encoding; s=pp1; bh=dEnP/mIUlLWHaGiuzYJnd4UvAkzceD7NMcweM9Pm6b0=; b=Ejt/GsLay3qkjdaX2byPCMv4o//G96lxdNCDJ0SSs5diEHwbpfRkSIgKG/msejDffD5E IBBLxTQwChb8DrurqeX5zOwV+ar+5PNBNf0Ha/cA5OoFO+UdrH5ZvrdEHjfbyVmW6ZBB gUooM8wypJOK+VYYIsBTPg9daPye/pDAfI8p8nAVmO6S40n9Ncp/9wsCWtdOetYNu+Ww QCUzqqIV80nVMOJ+NVITmHTNdXVyV3oT6t6B9OAV6Z1Zv+JOk5PQ8B9VihIJINZfbbwK Be6tOvdU6L/hYCKYxT21hDpfjsNUZggDGsT6GV0R+gj/xdYoYWYSSj7t9fuUosIvAUMQ VQ== Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3newhm0fq5-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 31 Jan 2023 06:40:11 +0000 Received: from m0098404.ppops.net (m0098404.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.17.1.5/8.17.1.5) with ESMTP id 30V6aOSk029059; Tue, 31 Jan 2023 06:40:11 GMT Received: from ppma06ams.nl.ibm.com (66.31.33a9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.51.49.102]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3newhm0fp1-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 31 Jan 2023 06:40:11 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma06ams.nl.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma06ams.nl.ibm.com (8.17.1.19/8.17.1.19) with ESMTP id 30UL30kh014675; Tue, 31 Jan 2023 06:40:09 GMT Received: from smtprelay07.fra02v.mail.ibm.com ([9.218.2.229]) by ppma06ams.nl.ibm.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3ncvttu3ne-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 31 Jan 2023 06:40:08 +0000 Received: from smtpav04.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (smtpav04.fra02v.mail.ibm.com [10.20.54.103]) by smtprelay07.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 30V6e6Si43385118 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 31 Jan 2023 06:40:06 GMT Received: from smtpav04.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7795F2004F; Tue, 31 Jan 2023 06:40:06 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtpav04.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBF1820043; Tue, 31 Jan 2023 06:40:05 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ozlabs.au.ibm.com (unknown [9.192.253.14]) by smtpav04.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Tue, 31 Jan 2023 06:40:05 +0000 (GMT) Received: from jarvis-ozlabs-ibm-com.au.ibm.com (unknown [9.192.255.228]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.au.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 04A2D6063C; Tue, 31 Jan 2023 17:40:04 +1100 (AEDT) From: Andrew Donnellan To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH v5 03/25] powerpc/secvar: Fix incorrect return in secvar_sysfs_load() Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2023 17:39:06 +1100 Message-Id: <20230131063928.388035-4-ajd@linux.ibm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.1 In-Reply-To: <20230131063928.388035-1-ajd@linux.ibm.com> References: <20230131063928.388035-1-ajd@linux.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: MPODgCbLFFm7ESFDzef4fenXc_5P2lxz X-Proofpoint-GUID: s9pGWRVy13r6jyPglb_1xDOkVV1bldof X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.219,Aquarius:18.0.930,Hydra:6.0.562,FMLib:17.11.122.1 definitions=2023-01-31_02,2023-01-30_01,2022-06-22_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 clxscore=1015 impostorscore=0 suspectscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 lowpriorityscore=0 adultscore=0 spamscore=0 priorityscore=1501 mlxscore=0 bulkscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2212070000 definitions=main-2301310059 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: sudhakar@linux.ibm.com, erichte@linux.ibm.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, nayna@linux.ibm.com, npiggin@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, zohar@linux.ibm.com, gjoyce@linux.ibm.com, ruscur@russell.cc, joel@jms.id.au, bgray@linux.ibm.com, brking@linux.ibm.com, gcwilson@linux.ibm.com, stefanb@linux.ibm.com Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" From: Russell Currey secvar_ops->get_next() returns -ENOENT when there are no more variables to return, which is expected behaviour. Fix this by returning 0 if get_next() returns -ENOENT. This fixes an issue introduced in commit bd5d9c743d38 ("powerpc: expose secure variables to userspace via sysfs"), but the return code of secvar_sysfs_load() was never checked so this issue never mattered. Signed-off-by: Russell Currey Signed-off-by: Andrew Donnellan --- v5: New patch --- arch/powerpc/kernel/secvar-sysfs.c | 6 ++++-- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/secvar-sysfs.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/secvar-sysfs.c index 1ee4640a2641..7fa5f8ed9542 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/secvar-sysfs.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/secvar-sysfs.c @@ -179,8 +179,10 @@ static int secvar_sysfs_load(void) rc = secvar_ops->get_next(name, &namesize, NAME_MAX_SIZE); if (rc) { if (rc != -ENOENT) - pr_err("error getting secvar from firmware %d\n", - rc); + pr_err("error getting secvar from firmware %d\n", rc); + else + rc = 0; + break; } -- 2.39.1