linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com>
To: linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	loongarch@lists.linux.dev, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 10/10] perf/ring_buffer: use local_try_cmpxchg in __perf_output_begin
Date: Sun,  5 Mar 2023 21:56:28 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230305205628.27385-11-ubizjak@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230305205628.27385-1-ubizjak@gmail.com>

Use local_try_cmpxchg instead of local_cmpxchg (*ptr, old, new) == old in
__perf_output_begin.  x86 CMPXCHG instruction returns success in ZF flag,
so this change saves a compare after cmpxchg.

Also, local_try_cmpxchg implicitly assigns old *ptr value to "old" when
cmpxchg fails. There is no need to re-read the value in the loop.

No functional change intended.

Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com>
---
 kernel/events/ring_buffer.c | 5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/events/ring_buffer.c b/kernel/events/ring_buffer.c
index 273a0fe7910a..e07c10f4d141 100644
--- a/kernel/events/ring_buffer.c
+++ b/kernel/events/ring_buffer.c
@@ -191,9 +191,10 @@ __perf_output_begin(struct perf_output_handle *handle,
 
 	perf_output_get_handle(handle);
 
+	offset = local_read(&rb->head);
 	do {
+		head = offset;
 		tail = READ_ONCE(rb->user_page->data_tail);
-		offset = head = local_read(&rb->head);
 		if (!rb->overwrite) {
 			if (unlikely(!ring_buffer_has_space(head, tail,
 							    perf_data_size(rb),
@@ -217,7 +218,7 @@ __perf_output_begin(struct perf_output_handle *handle,
 			head += size;
 		else
 			head -= size;
-	} while (local_cmpxchg(&rb->head, offset, head) != offset);
+	} while (!local_try_cmpxchg(&rb->head, &offset, head));
 
 	if (backward) {
 		offset = head;
-- 
2.39.2


      parent reply	other threads:[~2023-03-05 21:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-03-05 20:56 [PATCH 00/10] locking: Introduce local{,64}_try_cmpxchg Uros Bizjak
2023-03-05 20:56 ` [PATCH 01/10] locking/atomic: Add missing cast to try_cmpxchg() fallbacks Uros Bizjak
2023-03-24 14:13   ` Mark Rutland
2023-03-24 15:43     ` Uros Bizjak
2023-03-24 16:14       ` Mark Rutland
2023-03-24 16:32         ` Mark Rutland
2023-03-26 19:28           ` Uros Bizjak
2023-04-03 10:19             ` Mark Rutland
2023-04-04 12:24               ` Uros Bizjak
2023-04-04 13:19                 ` Mark Rutland
2023-04-04 13:23                   ` Uros Bizjak
2023-03-05 20:56 ` [PATCH 02/10] locking/atomic: Add generic try_cmpxchg{,64}_local support Uros Bizjak
2023-03-05 20:56 ` [PATCH 03/10] locking/alpha: Wire up local_try_cmpxchg Uros Bizjak
2023-03-05 20:56 ` [PATCH 04/10] locking/loongarch: " Uros Bizjak
2023-03-05 20:56 ` [PATCH 05/10] locking/mips: " Uros Bizjak
2023-03-05 20:56 ` [PATCH 06/10] locking/powerpc: " Uros Bizjak
2023-03-05 20:56 ` [PATCH 07/10] locking/x86: " Uros Bizjak
2023-03-05 20:56 ` [PATCH 08/10] locking/generic: Wire up local{,64}_try_cmpxchg Uros Bizjak
2023-03-05 20:56 ` [PATCH 09/10] locking/x86: Enable local{,64}_try_cmpxchg Uros Bizjak
2023-03-05 20:56 ` Uros Bizjak [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230305205628.27385-11-ubizjak@gmail.com \
    --to=ubizjak@gmail.com \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=irogers@google.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mips@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=loongarch@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).