linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rohan McLure <rmclure@linux.ibm.com>
To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Cc: elver@google.com, arnd@arndb.de, gautam@linux.ibm.com,
	Rohan McLure <rmclure@linux.ibm.com>,
	npiggin@gmail.com, will@kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] asm-generic/mmiowb: Mark accesses to fix KCSAN warnings
Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2023 16:46:45 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231127054648.1205221-2-rmclure@linux.ibm.com> (raw)

Prior to this patch, data races are detectable by KCSAN of the following
forms:

[1] Asynchronous calls to mmiowb_set_pending() from an interrupt context
    or otherwise outside of a critical section
[2] Interrupted critical sections, where the interrupt will itself
    acquire a lock

In case [1], calling context does not need an mmiowb() call to be
issued, otherwise it would do so itself. Such calls to
mmiowb_set_pending() are either idempotent or no-ops.

In case [2], irrespective of when the interrupt occurs, the interrupt
will acquire and release its locks prior to its return, nesting_count
will continue balanced. In the worst case, the interrupted critical
section during a mmiowb_spin_unlock() call observes an mmiowb to be
pending and afterward is interrupted, leading to an extraneous call to
mmiowb(). This data race is clearly innocuous.

Resolve KCSAN warnings of type [1] by means of READ_ONCE, WRITE_ONCE.
As increments and decrements to nesting_count are balanced by interrupt
contexts, resolve type [2] warnings by simply revoking instrumentation,
with data_race() rather than READ_ONCE() and WRITE_ONCE(), the memory
consistency semantics of plain-accesses will still lead to correct
behaviour.

Signed-off-by: Rohan McLure <rmclure@linux.ibm.com>
Reported-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Reported-by: Gautam Menghani <gautam@linux.ibm.com>
Tested-by: Gautam Menghani <gautam@linux.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
---
Previously discussed here:
https://lore.kernel.org/linuxppc-dev/20230510033117.1395895-4-rmclure@linux.ibm.com/
But pushed back due to affecting other architectures. Reissuing, to
linuxppc-dev, as it does not enact a functional change.
---
 include/asm-generic/mmiowb.h | 15 +++++++++------
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/asm-generic/mmiowb.h b/include/asm-generic/mmiowb.h
index 5698fca3bf56..f8c7c8a84e9e 100644
--- a/include/asm-generic/mmiowb.h
+++ b/include/asm-generic/mmiowb.h
@@ -37,25 +37,28 @@ static inline void mmiowb_set_pending(void)
 	struct mmiowb_state *ms = __mmiowb_state();
 
 	if (likely(ms->nesting_count))
-		ms->mmiowb_pending = ms->nesting_count;
+		WRITE_ONCE(ms->mmiowb_pending, ms->nesting_count);
 }
 
 static inline void mmiowb_spin_lock(void)
 {
 	struct mmiowb_state *ms = __mmiowb_state();
-	ms->nesting_count++;
+
+	/* Increment need not be atomic. Nestedness is balanced over interrupts. */
+	data_race(ms->nesting_count++);
 }
 
 static inline void mmiowb_spin_unlock(void)
 {
 	struct mmiowb_state *ms = __mmiowb_state();
+	u16 pending = READ_ONCE(ms->mmiowb_pending);
 
-	if (unlikely(ms->mmiowb_pending)) {
-		ms->mmiowb_pending = 0;
+	WRITE_ONCE(ms->mmiowb_pending, 0);
+	if (unlikely(pending))
 		mmiowb();
-	}
 
-	ms->nesting_count--;
+	/* Decrement need not be atomic. Nestedness is balanced over interrupts. */
+	data_race(ms->nesting_count--);
 }
 #else
 #define mmiowb_set_pending()		do { } while (0)
-- 
2.43.0


             reply	other threads:[~2023-11-27  5:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-11-27  5:46 Rohan McLure [this message]
2023-11-27  5:46 ` [PATCH 2/3] powerpc: Apply __always_inline to interrupt_{enter,exit}_prepare() Rohan McLure
2023-11-27  5:46 ` [PATCH 3/3] powerpc/64: Only warn for kuap locked when KCSAN not present Rohan McLure

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20231127054648.1205221-2-rmclure@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=rmclure@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=elver@google.com \
    --cc=gautam@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).