linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nathan Lynch via B4 Relay <devnull+nathanl.linux.ibm.com@kernel.org>
To: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
	 Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Cc: "Nathan Lynch" <nathanl@linux.ibm.com>,
	tyreld@linux.ibm.com, gcwilson@linux.ibm.com,
	"Aneesh Kumar K.V (IBM)" <aneesh.kumar@kernel.org>,
	"Michal Suchánek" <msuchanek@suse.de>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: [PATCH v6 07/13] powerpc/rtas: Serialize firmware activation sequences
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2023 11:01:54 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231212-papr-sys_rtas-vs-lockdown-v6-7-e9eafd0c8c6c@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231212-papr-sys_rtas-vs-lockdown-v6-0-e9eafd0c8c6c@linux.ibm.com>

From: Nathan Lynch <nathanl@linux.ibm.com>

Use rtas_ibm_activate_firmware_lock to prevent interleaving call
sequences of the ibm,activate-firmware RTAS function, which typically
requires multiple calls to complete the update. While the spec does
not specifically prohibit interleaved sequences, there's almost
certainly no advantage to allowing them.

Reviewed-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V (IBM) <aneesh.kumar@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Nathan Lynch <nathanl@linux.ibm.com>
---
 arch/powerpc/kernel/rtas.c | 4 ++++
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/rtas.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/rtas.c
index 4d28983e8b1d..72f6b5a402dd 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/rtas.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/rtas.c
@@ -1734,10 +1734,14 @@ void rtas_activate_firmware(void)
 		return;
 	}
 
+	mutex_lock(&rtas_ibm_activate_firmware_lock);
+
 	do {
 		fwrc = rtas_call(token, 0, 1, NULL);
 	} while (rtas_busy_delay(fwrc));
 
+	mutex_unlock(&rtas_ibm_activate_firmware_lock);
+
 	if (fwrc)
 		pr_err("ibm,activate-firmware failed (%i)\n", fwrc);
 }

-- 
2.41.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-12-12 17:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-12-12 17:01 [PATCH v6 00/13] powerpc/pseries: New character devices for system parameters and VPD Nathan Lynch via B4 Relay
2023-12-12 17:01 ` [PATCH v6 01/13] powerpc/rtas: Avoid warning on invalid token argument to sys_rtas() Nathan Lynch via B4 Relay
2023-12-12 17:01 ` [PATCH v6 02/13] powerpc/rtas: Add for_each_rtas_function() iterator Nathan Lynch via B4 Relay
2023-12-12 17:01 ` [PATCH v6 03/13] powerpc/rtas: Fall back to linear search on failed token->function lookup Nathan Lynch via B4 Relay
2023-12-12 17:01 ` [PATCH v6 04/13] powerpc/rtas: Add function return status constants Nathan Lynch via B4 Relay
2023-12-12 17:01 ` [PATCH v6 05/13] powerpc/rtas: Move token validation from block_rtas_call() to sys_rtas() Nathan Lynch via B4 Relay
2023-12-12 17:01 ` [PATCH v6 06/13] powerpc/rtas: Facilitate high-level call sequences Nathan Lynch via B4 Relay
2023-12-12 17:01 ` Nathan Lynch via B4 Relay [this message]
2023-12-12 17:01 ` [PATCH v6 08/13] powerpc/rtas: Warn if per-function lock isn't held Nathan Lynch via B4 Relay
2023-12-12 17:01 ` [PATCH v6 09/13] powerpc/pseries: Add papr-vpd character driver for VPD retrieval Nathan Lynch via B4 Relay
2023-12-12 17:01 ` [PATCH v6 10/13] powerpc/pseries/papr-sysparm: Validate buffer object lengths Nathan Lynch via B4 Relay
2023-12-12 17:01 ` [PATCH v6 11/13] powerpc/pseries/papr-sysparm: Expose character device to user space Nathan Lynch via B4 Relay
2023-12-12 17:01 ` [PATCH v6 12/13] powerpc/selftests: Add test for papr-vpd Nathan Lynch via B4 Relay
2023-12-12 17:02 ` [PATCH v6 13/13] powerpc/selftests: Add test for papr-sysparm Nathan Lynch via B4 Relay
2023-12-21 10:38 ` [PATCH v6 00/13] powerpc/pseries: New character devices for system parameters and VPD Michael Ellerman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20231212-papr-sys_rtas-vs-lockdown-v6-7-e9eafd0c8c6c@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=devnull+nathanl.linux.ibm.com@kernel.org \
    --cc=aneesh.kumar@kernel.org \
    --cc=gcwilson@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=msuchanek@suse.de \
    --cc=nathanl@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
    --cc=tyreld@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).