From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03F39C43381 for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 06:51:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7EBF320823 for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 06:51:18 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 7EBF320823 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 445MSM5tdCzDqTy for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 17:51:15 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (mailfrom) smtp.mailfrom=linux.ibm.com (client-ip=148.163.158.5; helo=mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com; envelope-from=sandipan@linux.ibm.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.158.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 445MQ522SZzDqRk for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 17:49:17 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098421.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x1M6i3eM116600 for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 01:49:14 -0500 Received: from e06smtp01.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp01.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.97]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2qtafcbwtx-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 01:49:14 -0500 Received: from localhost by e06smtp01.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 06:49:12 -0000 Received: from b06cxnps4074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.109.196) by e06smtp01.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.131) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Fri, 22 Feb 2019 06:49:10 -0000 Received: from b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.160]) by b06cxnps4074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id x1M6n9cC29884528 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 22 Feb 2019 06:49:09 GMT Received: from b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 485A4A4065; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 06:49:09 +0000 (GMT) Received: from b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 327B7A405C; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 06:49:08 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [9.124.31.81] (unknown [9.124.31.81]) by b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 06:49:08 +0000 (GMT) Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] powerpc: sstep: Add tests for compute type instructions To: Michael Ellerman References: <87r2c15r8w.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au> From: Sandipan Das Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2019 12:19:07 +0530 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <87r2c15r8w.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 19022206-4275-0000-0000-000003128A24 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 19022206-4276-0000-0000-00003820C04E Message-Id: <23929c85-db2c-de3d-6716-215a8c95c4cb@linux.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, , definitions=2019-02-22_05:, , signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1810050000 definitions=main-1902220046 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: naveen.n.rao@linux.ibm.com, paulus@samba.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com, dja@axtens.net Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" Hi Michael, On 21/02/19 4:43 PM, Michael Ellerman wrote: > Sandipan Das writes: >> This enhances the current selftest framework for validating >> the in-kernel instruction emulation infrastructure by adding >> support for compute type instructions i.e. integer ALU-based >> instructions. Originally, this framework was limited to only >> testing load and store instructions. >> >> While most of the GPRs can be validated, support for SPRs is >> limited to LR, CR and XER for now. >> >> When writing the test cases, one must ensure that the Stack >> Pointer (GPR1) or the Thread Pointer (GPR13) are not touched >> by any means as these are vital non-volatile registers. >> >> Signed-off-by: Sandipan Das >> --- >> arch/powerpc/lib/Makefile | 3 +- >> arch/powerpc/lib/test_emulate_step.c | 167 +++++++++++++++++- >> .../lib/test_emulate_step_exec_instr.S | 150 ++++++++++++++++ >> 3 files changed, 315 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) >> create mode 100644 arch/powerpc/lib/test_emulate_step_exec_instr.S > > Hi Sandipan, > > Thanks for the exceptionally well written asm, I wish all our asm code > was that neat and well commented :) > > I'd like to get this merged today so I tweaked it slightly when > applying to use the new patch_site helpers we added recently, see diff > below. > > cheers > > Thanks for modernizing it :) - Sandipan