From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF04CC4332B for ; Mon, 23 Mar 2020 13:41:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 287E520735 for ; Mon, 23 Mar 2020 13:41:36 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 287E520735 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48mFsS6Hs7zDqHv for ; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 00:41:32 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=linux.ibm.com (client-ip=148.163.158.5; helo=mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com; envelope-from=ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.158.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48mFn66bPSzDqDt for ; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 00:37:46 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098416.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 02NDWc3F063272 for ; Mon, 23 Mar 2020 09:37:44 -0400 Received: from e06smtp03.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp03.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.99]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2ywchvnbsq-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Mon, 23 Mar 2020 09:37:44 -0400 Received: from localhost by e06smtp03.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Mon, 23 Mar 2020 13:37:42 -0000 Received: from b06cxnps4076.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.109.198) by e06smtp03.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.133) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Mon, 23 Mar 2020 13:37:38 -0000 Received: from d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (mk.ibm.com [9.149.105.60]) by b06cxnps4076.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 02NDbbJo13041712 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 23 Mar 2020 13:37:37 GMT Received: from d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41E1E42042; Mon, 23 Mar 2020 13:37:37 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF5634203F; Mon, 23 Mar 2020 13:37:33 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [9.199.48.122] (unknown [9.199.48.122]) by d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 Mar 2020 13:37:33 +0000 (GMT) From: Ravi Bangoria Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/15] powerpc/watchpoint: Preparation for more than one watchpoint To: Christophe Leroy References: <20200309085806.155823-1-ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com> <429c04e9-7267-55a9-a6f9-1fe9b21ae033@linux.ibm.com> Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2020 19:07:32 +0530 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <429c04e9-7267-55a9-a6f9-1fe9b21ae033@linux.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 20032313-0012-0000-0000-000003963B45 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 20032313-0013-0000-0000-000021D32BAA Message-Id: <27a3c6c0-3880-406a-3e1e-ccb017e5a77c@linux.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.138, 18.0.645 definitions=2020-03-23_04:2020-03-21, 2020-03-23 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 mlxscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 priorityscore=1501 bulkscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 impostorscore=0 suspectscore=0 clxscore=1015 spamscore=0 malwarescore=0 adultscore=0 phishscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2003020000 definitions=main-2003230075 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: apopple@linux.ibm.com, mikey@neuling.org, Ravi Bangoria , peterz@infradead.org, oleg@redhat.com, npiggin@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, paulus@samba.org, jolsa@kernel.org, fweisbec@gmail.com, naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, mingo@kernel.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On 3/18/20 6:22 PM, Ravi Bangoria wrote: > > > On 3/16/20 8:35 PM, Christophe Leroy wrote: >> >> >> Le 09/03/2020 à 09:57, Ravi Bangoria a écrit : >>> So far, powerpc Book3S code has been written with an assumption of only >>> one watchpoint. But future power architecture is introducing second >>> watchpoint register (DAWR). Even though this patchset does not enable >>> 2nd DAWR, it make the infrastructure ready so that enabling 2nd DAWR >>> should just be a matter of changing count. >> >> Some book3s (e300 family for instance, I think G2 as well) already have a DABR2 in addition to DABR. >> Will this series allow to use it as well ? > > I wasn't aware of that. I'll take a look at their specs and check if they > can piggyback on this series for 2nd DABR. There are some differences between G2/e300 DABRs and Book3S DAWRs. G2/e300 DABRs provides some functionalities like "Match if EA less/greater than DABR", "combined mode" etc. are not present with DAWRs. DBCR on G2/e300 also provides which DABR caused the exception. So this series might not directly allow to use DABR2 but, I guess, it should work as base infrastructure. Ravi