From: Nayna Jain <nayna@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Lakshmi Ramasubramanian <nramas@linux.microsoft.com>,
Nayna Jain <nayna@linux.ibm.com>,
linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, linux-efi@vger.kernel.org,
linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
Eric Ricther <erichte@linux.ibm.com>,
Prakhar Srivastava <prsriva02@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>,
Claudio Carvalho <cclaudio@linux.ibm.com>,
Matthew Garret <matthew.garret@nebula.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>, Jeremy Kerr <jk@ozlabs.org>,
Elaine Palmer <erpalmer@us.ibm.com>,
Oliver O'Halloran <oohall@gmail.com>,
George Wilson <gcwilson@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 2/8] powerpc/ima: add support to initialize ima policy rules
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2019 12:02:12 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <27dbe08e-5473-4dd0-d2ad-2df591e23f5e@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <dd7e04fc-25e8-280f-b565-bdb031939655@linux.microsoft.com>
On 10/24/19 12:35 PM, Lakshmi Ramasubramanian wrote:
> On 10/23/2019 8:47 PM, Nayna Jain wrote:
>
>> +/*
>> + * The "secure_rules" are enabled only on "secureboot" enabled systems.
>> + * These rules verify the file signatures against known good values.
>> + * The "appraise_type=imasig|modsig" option allows the known good
>> signature
>> + * to be stored as an xattr or as an appended signature.
>> + *
>> + * To avoid duplicate signature verification as much as possible,
>> the IMA
>> + * policy rule for module appraisal is added only if
>> CONFIG_MODULE_SIG_FORCE
>> + * is not enabled.
>> + */
>> +static const char *const secure_rules[] = {
>> + "appraise func=KEXEC_KERNEL_CHECK appraise_type=imasig|modsig",
>> +#ifndef CONFIG_MODULE_SIG_FORCE
>> + "appraise func=MODULE_CHECK appraise_type=imasig|modsig",
>> +#endif
>> + NULL
>> +};
>
> Is there any way to not use conditional compilation in the above array
> definition? Maybe define different functions to get "secure_rules" for
> when CONFIG_MODULE_SIG_FORCE is defined and when it is not defined.
How will you decide which function to be called ?
Thanks & Regards,
- Nayna
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-25 17:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-24 3:47 [PATCH v9 0/8] powerpc: Enabling IMA arch specific secure boot policies Nayna Jain
2019-10-24 3:47 ` [PATCH v9 1/8] powerpc: detect the secure boot mode of the system Nayna Jain
2019-10-24 17:26 ` Lakshmi Ramasubramanian
2019-10-25 16:49 ` Nayna Jain
2019-10-24 3:47 ` [PATCH v9 2/8] powerpc/ima: add support to initialize ima policy rules Nayna Jain
2019-10-24 17:35 ` Lakshmi Ramasubramanian
2019-10-25 17:02 ` Nayna Jain [this message]
2019-10-25 18:03 ` Lakshmi Ramasubramanian
2019-10-28 23:42 ` Michael Ellerman
2019-10-26 23:52 ` Mimi Zohar
2019-10-28 11:54 ` Mimi Zohar
2019-10-24 3:47 ` [PATCH v9 3/8] powerpc: detect the trusted boot state of the system Nayna Jain
2019-10-24 17:38 ` Lakshmi Ramasubramanian
2019-10-25 16:50 ` Nayna Jain
2019-10-24 3:47 ` [PATCH v9 4/8] powerpc/ima: define trusted boot policy Nayna Jain
2019-10-24 17:40 ` Lakshmi Ramasubramanian
2019-10-24 3:47 ` [PATCH v9 5/8] ima: make process_buffer_measurement() generic Nayna Jain
2019-10-24 15:20 ` Lakshmi Ramasubramanian
2019-10-25 17:24 ` Nayna Jain
2019-10-25 17:32 ` Lakshmi Ramasubramanian
2019-10-27 0:13 ` Mimi Zohar
2019-10-30 15:22 ` Lakshmi Ramasubramanian
2019-10-30 16:35 ` Mimi Zohar
2019-10-24 3:47 ` [PATCH v9 6/8] certs: add wrapper function to check blacklisted binary hash Nayna Jain
2019-10-24 3:47 ` [PATCH v9 7/8] ima: check against blacklisted hashes for files with modsig Nayna Jain
2019-10-24 17:48 ` Lakshmi Ramasubramanian
2019-10-25 17:36 ` Nayna Jain
2019-10-24 3:47 ` [PATCH v9 8/8] powerpc/ima: update ima arch policy to check for blacklist Nayna Jain
2019-10-28 12:10 ` [PATCH v9 0/8] powerpc: Enabling IMA arch specific secure boot policies Mimi Zohar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=27dbe08e-5473-4dd0-d2ad-2df591e23f5e@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=nayna@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
--cc=cclaudio@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=erichte@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=erpalmer@us.ibm.com \
--cc=gcwilson@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jk@ozlabs.org \
--cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=matthew.garret@nebula.com \
--cc=nayna@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=nramas@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=oohall@gmail.com \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=prsriva02@gmail.com \
--cc=zohar@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).