From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85B9EC43331 for ; Tue, 12 Nov 2019 23:01:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6C57520674 for ; Tue, 12 Nov 2019 23:01:38 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=xenosoft.de header.i=@xenosoft.de header.b="CmxT7wsU" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 6C57520674 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=xenosoft.de Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47CNXZ5cczzF5pC for ; Wed, 13 Nov 2019 10:01:34 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.helo=mo6-p01-ob.smtp.rzone.de (client-ip=2a01:238:20a:202:5301::2; helo=mo6-p01-ob.smtp.rzone.de; envelope-from=chzigotzky@xenosoft.de; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=xenosoft.de Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=xenosoft.de header.i=@xenosoft.de header.b="CmxT7wsU"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mo6-p01-ob.smtp.rzone.de (mo6-p01-ob.smtp.rzone.de [IPv6:2a01:238:20a:202:5301::2]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-384) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47CNTs1FfXzF492 for ; Wed, 13 Nov 2019 09:59:12 +1100 (AEDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1573599545; s=strato-dkim-0002; d=xenosoft.de; h=In-Reply-To:Date:Message-ID:From:References:Cc:To:Subject: X-RZG-CLASS-ID:X-RZG-AUTH:From:Subject:Sender; bh=l6LnXidqFjF8wEu13TNhLe3TegTl/p6HTykS60F7XJ0=; b=CmxT7wsUdTJRLl+J/HvEpebE8QeY+JNG/xIjQoEXB9lenjW5tMrhc6R0Y7cutL131/ 7S1VWeabLCYd93VxzubBCI+SGC6nYjmDsyALkERsZcgiUzAUbsoXJaJMbDjSvOGn+lfd mtAS33KI3tJ2dj8vdmrdveWzrrzEcSXLF2+X0mA9wRr6cmQh6679J087I3iI4ajsA+wZ avtXCf/i4omyHON+NLX+nnbRPtQp5DsiLacBTeJBU368Pu7oaoHBmY71gAdSUBGWwL7A 6LEekLPoN3RzPqIJa7S1gKXxg88iyd+4XS8hHmL3ztcnoIKbHLSzjuuF3bPVud1AZRMQ Waaw== X-RZG-AUTH: ":L2QefEenb+UdBJSdRCXu93KJ1bmSGnhMdmOod1DhGM4l4Hio94KKxRySfLxnHfJ+Dkjp5DdBJSrwuuqxvPhbLt/v7eF2q0hCA21Ezkix5/Bq7A==" X-RZG-CLASS-ID: mo00 Received: from [IPv6:2a02:8109:89c0:ebfc:881b:29d1:ef56:a34c] by smtp.strato.de (RZmta 44.29.0 AUTH) with ESMTPSA id q007c8vACMwMiL6 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (curve secp521r1 with 521 ECDH bits, eq. 15360 bits RSA)) (Client did not present a certificate); Tue, 12 Nov 2019 23:58:22 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: Bug 205201 - overflow of DMA mask and bus mask To: Christoph Hellwig References: <71A251A5-FA06-4019-B324-7AED32F7B714@xenosoft.de> <1b0c5c21-2761-d3a3-651b-3687bb6ae694@xenosoft.de> <3504ee70-02de-049e-6402-2d530bf55a84@xenosoft.de> <46025f1b-db20-ac23-7dcd-10bc43bbb6ee@xenosoft.de> <20191105162856.GA15402@lst.de> <2f3c81bd-d498-066a-12c0-0a7715cda18f@xenosoft.de>

<0c5a8009-d28b-601f-3d1a-9de0e869911c@xenosoft.de> <20191112144109.GA11805@lst.de> From: Christian Zigotzky Message-ID: <288d3c11-725b-ecdd-2495-b4a69aafb693@xenosoft.de> Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2019 23:58:22 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20191112144109.GA11805@lst.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: de-DE X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, darren@stevens-zone.net, mad skateman , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, Rob Herring , paulus@samba.org, rtd2@xtra.co.nz, "contact@a-eon.com" , linuxppc-dev , nsaenzjulienne@suse.de Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On 12 November 2019 at 3:41 pm, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Mon, Nov 11, 2019 at 01:22:55PM +0100, Christian Zigotzky wrote: >> Now, I can definitely say that this patch does not solve the issue. >> >> Do you have another patch for testing or shall I bisect? > I'm still interested in the .config and dmesg. Especially if the > board is using arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_pci.c, which is the only > place inside the powerpc arch code doing funny things with the > bus_dma_mask, which Robin pointed out looks fishy. > Here you are: .config: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=285815 dmesg: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=285813 Thanks