From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <SRS0=6cb3=P7=lists.ozlabs.org=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@kernel.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on
	aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED,
	HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_PASS,
	URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0
Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99])
	by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45CEAC282C0
	for <linuxppc-dev@archiver.kernel.org>; Wed, 23 Jan 2019 14:57:50 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 806D720870
	for <linuxppc-dev@archiver.kernel.org>; Wed, 23 Jan 2019 14:57:49 +0000 (UTC)
Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org;
	dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=c-s.fr header.i=@c-s.fr header.b="F3qPcDBg"
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 806D720870
Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=c-s.fr
Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org
Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3])
	by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43l7gb3gTdzDqLS
	for <linuxppc-dev@archiver.kernel.org>; Thu, 24 Jan 2019 01:57:47 +1100 (AEDT)
Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org;
 spf=pass (mailfrom) smtp.mailfrom=c-s.fr
 (client-ip=93.17.236.30; helo=pegase1.c-s.fr;
 envelope-from=christophe.leroy@c-s.fr; receiver=<UNKNOWN>)
Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org;
 dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=c-s.fr
Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key;
 unprotected) header.d=c-s.fr header.i=@c-s.fr header.b="F3qPcDBg"; 
 dkim-atps=neutral
Received: from pegase1.c-s.fr (pegase1.c-s.fr [93.17.236.30])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 43l7dm6XFLzDqGk
 for <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>; Thu, 24 Jan 2019 01:56:12 +1100 (AEDT)
Received: from localhost (mailhub1-int [192.168.12.234])
 by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43l7dd4Mcjz9tyTN;
 Wed, 23 Jan 2019 15:56:05 +0100 (CET)
Authentication-Results: localhost; dkim=pass
 reason="1024-bit key; insecure key"
 header.d=c-s.fr header.i=@c-s.fr header.b=F3qPcDBg; dkim-adsp=pass;
 dkim-atps=neutral
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at c-s.fr
Received: from pegase1.c-s.fr ([192.168.12.234])
 by localhost (pegase1.c-s.fr [192.168.12.234]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id KCT9hiWv9axF; Wed, 23 Jan 2019 15:56:05 +0100 (CET)
Received: from messagerie.si.c-s.fr (messagerie.si.c-s.fr [192.168.25.192])
 by pegase1.c-s.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43l7dd396Dz9tyTL;
 Wed, 23 Jan 2019 15:56:05 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=c-s.fr; s=mail;
 t=1548255365; bh=sSpBcnR1qxezOo1ri8qRsSrq7fLG0SxqCxAbgIGwrBs=;
 h=Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From;
 b=F3qPcDBgEgn4kltWSxnGy+D5nem5aJmbvstdrm+IFkantZ2X4qhOh1w+Tjsl9Phnp
 dqQ3yp4o3Hqd4bYtkq6vBCB1xdlZ9zLtR+VExiQ9dxiZ/A/mYYYCbGUddKr+4aACjC
 VaaiCO6C9PKG98Gte4OahF0oeZkm1fYvHxq3GTIA=
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by messagerie.si.c-s.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2FC08B820;
 Wed, 23 Jan 2019 15:56:06 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at c-s.fr
Received: from messagerie.si.c-s.fr ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (messagerie.si.c-s.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10023)
 with ESMTP id vMi-tTw7U0b6; Wed, 23 Jan 2019 15:56:06 +0100 (CET)
Received: from PO15451 (unknown [192.168.4.90])
 by messagerie.si.c-s.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BCCB8B81E;
 Wed, 23 Jan 2019 15:56:06 +0100 (CET)
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tools/testing/selftests/powerpc: Add Anton's null_syscall
 benchmark to the selftests
To: Rui Teng <rui.teng@linux.vnet.ibm.com>, Anton Blanchard <anton@au1.ibm.com>
References: <20160927141016.6027-1-rui.teng@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@c-s.fr>
Message-ID: <2b98b303-d0d4-9f1d-9c47-fde0afb1306c@c-s.fr>
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2019 15:56:06 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/60.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20160927141016.6027-1-rui.teng@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: fr
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List <linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.ozlabs.org/options/linuxppc-dev>,
 <mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@lists.ozlabs.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>
List-Help: <mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@lists.ozlabs.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev>,
 <mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@lists.ozlabs.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: Michael Neuling <mikey@neuling.org>, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
 linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
 Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>, Cyril Bur <cyrilbur@gmail.com>
Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org
Sender: "Linuxppc-dev"
 <linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org>



Le 27/09/2016 à 16:10, Rui Teng a écrit :
> From: Anton Blanchard <anton@au.ibm.com>
> 
> Pull in a version of Anton's null_syscall benchmark:
> http://ozlabs.org/~anton/junkcode/null_syscall.c
> Into tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/benchmarks.
> 
> Suggested-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
> Signed-off-by: Anton Blanchard <anton@au.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Rui Teng <rui.teng@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
>   .../testing/selftests/powerpc/benchmarks/Makefile  |   2 +-
>   .../selftests/powerpc/benchmarks/null_syscall.c    | 157 +++++++++++++++++++++
>   2 files changed, 158 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>   create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/benchmarks/null_syscall.c
> 

[...]

> +
> +static void do_null_syscall(unsigned long nr)
> +{
> +	unsigned long i;
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < nr; i++)
> +		getppid();
> +}
> +

Looks like getppid() performs a rcu_read_lock(). Is that what we want ?

Shouldn't we use getpid() instead for a lighter syscall ?

Christophe