linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
To: Rohan McLure <rmclure@linux.ibm.com>,
	"linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>
Cc: "linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org>,
	"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 09/12] powerpc: mm: Add common pud_pfn stub for all platforms
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2024 11:08:03 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <339a9b64-cba4-42df-82c5-9f0b1113312c@csgroup.eu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240313042118.230397-10-rmclure@linux.ibm.com>



Le 13/03/2024 à 05:21, Rohan McLure a écrit :
> Prior to this commit, pud_pfn was implemented with BUILD_BUG as the inline
> function for 64-bit Book3S systems but is never included, as its
> invocations in generic code are guarded by calls to pud_devmap which return
> zero on such systems. A future patch will provide support for page table
> checks, the generic code for which depends on a pud_pfn stub being
> implemented, even while the patch will not interact with puds directly.
> 
> Remove the 64-bit Book3S stub and define pud_pfn to warn on all
> platforms. pud_pfn may be defined properly on a per-platform basis
> should it grow real usages in future.

Can you please re-explain why that's needed ? I remember we discussed it 
already in the past, but I checked again today and can't see the need:

In mm/page_table_check.c, the call to pud_pfn() is gated by a call to 
pud_user_accessible_page(pud). If I look into arm64 version of 
pud_user_accessible_page(), it depends on pud_leaf(). When pud_leaf() is 
constant 0, pud_user_accessible_page() is always false and the call to 
pud_pfn() should be folded away.

> 
> Signed-off-by: Rohan McLure <rmclure@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
>   arch/powerpc/include/asm/pgtable.h | 14 ++++++++++++++
>   1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pgtable.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pgtable.h
> index 0c0ffbe7a3b5..13f661831333 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pgtable.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pgtable.h
> @@ -213,6 +213,20 @@ static inline bool arch_supports_memmap_on_memory(unsigned long vmemmap_size)
>   
>   #endif /* CONFIG_PPC64 */
>   
> +/*
> + * Currently only consumed by page_table_check_pud_{set,clear}. Since clears
> + * and sets to page table entries at any level are done through
> + * page_table_check_pte_{set,clear}, provide stub implementation.
> + */
> +#ifndef pud_pfn
> +#define pud_pfn pud_pfn
> +static inline int pud_pfn(pud_t pud)
> +{
> +	WARN_ONCE(1, "pud: platform does not use pud entries directly");
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +#endif
> +
>   #endif /* __ASSEMBLY__ */
>   
>   #endif /* _ASM_POWERPC_PGTABLE_H */

  reply	other threads:[~2024-03-13 11:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-03-13  4:21 [PATCH v10 00/12] Support page table check PowerPC Rohan McLure
2024-03-13  4:21 ` [PATCH v10 01/12] Revert "mm/page_table_check: remove unused parameter in [__]page_table_check_pud_set" Rohan McLure
2024-03-13  4:21 ` [PATCH v10 02/12] Revert "mm/page_table_check: remove unused parameter in [__]page_table_check_pmd_set" Rohan McLure
2024-03-13  4:21 ` [PATCH v10 03/12] mm: Provide addr parameter to page_table_check_pte_set() Rohan McLure
2024-03-13  4:21 ` [PATCH v10 04/12] Revert "mm/page_table_check: remove unused parameter in [__]page_table_check_pud_clear" Rohan McLure
2024-03-13  4:21 ` [PATCH v10 05/12] Revert "mm/page_table_check: remove unused parameter in [__]page_table_check_pmd_clear" Rohan McLure
2024-03-13  4:21 ` [PATCH v10 06/12] Revert "mm/page_table_check: remove unused parameter in [__]page_table_check_pte_clear" Rohan McLure
2024-03-13  4:21 ` [PATCH v10 07/12] mm: Provide address parameter to p{te,md,ud}_user_accessible_page() Rohan McLure
2024-03-13  4:21 ` [PATCH v10 08/12] powerpc: mm: Replace p{u,m,4}d_is_leaf with p{u,m,4}_leaf Rohan McLure
2024-03-13 10:33   ` Christophe Leroy
2024-03-13  4:21 ` [PATCH v10 09/12] powerpc: mm: Add common pud_pfn stub for all platforms Rohan McLure
2024-03-13 11:08   ` Christophe Leroy [this message]
2024-03-14  0:18     ` LTC IMAP
2024-03-13  4:21 ` [PATCH v10 10/12] poweprc: mm: Implement *_user_accessible_page() for ptes Rohan McLure
2024-03-13 11:19   ` Christophe Leroy
2024-03-13  4:21 ` [PATCH v10 11/12] powerpc: mm: Use set_pte_at_unchecked() for early-boot / internal usages Rohan McLure
2024-03-13 11:30   ` Christophe Leroy
2024-03-15  0:45     ` LTC IMAP
2024-03-13  4:21 ` [PATCH v10 12/12] powerpc: mm: Support page table check Rohan McLure

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=339a9b64-cba4-42df-82c5-9f0b1113312c@csgroup.eu \
    --to=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=rmclure@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).