From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F447C41621 for ; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 09:38:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0439920775 for ; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 09:38:22 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 0439920775 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.vnet.ibm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48mmQN3LQHzDr34 for ; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 20:38:20 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=none (no SPF record) smtp.mailfrom=linux.vnet.ibm.com (client-ip=148.163.158.5; helo=mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com; envelope-from=sachinp@linux.vnet.ibm.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.vnet.ibm.com Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.158.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48mmNY0cYZzDqrN for ; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 20:36:44 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098417.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 02O9ZNTo065644 for ; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 05:36:41 -0400 Received: from e06smtp02.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp02.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.98]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2ywet3bt8j-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 05:36:41 -0400 Received: from localhost by e06smtp02.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 09:36:38 -0000 Received: from b06cxnps4076.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.109.198) by e06smtp02.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.132) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Tue, 24 Mar 2020 09:36:34 -0000 Received: from d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.60]) by b06cxnps4076.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 02O9aYB232964816 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 24 Mar 2020 09:36:34 GMT Received: from d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D19842042; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 09:36:34 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18C7442041; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 09:36:33 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [9.199.50.248] (unknown [9.199.50.248]) by d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 09:36:32 +0000 (GMT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\)) Subject: Re: [5.6.0-rc7] Kernel crash while running ndctl tests From: Sachin Sant In-Reply-To: <87a746cdva.fsf@linux.ibm.com> Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2020 15:06:31 +0530 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable References: <87a746cdva.fsf@linux.ibm.com> To: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11) X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 20032409-0008-0000-0000-00000362E88A X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 20032409-0009-0000-0000-00004A845422 Message-Id: <33E32320-C371-4A41-A3E1-4B9D2DDAFBFC@linux.vnet.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.138, 18.0.645 definitions=2020-03-24_02:2020-03-23, 2020-03-24 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 impostorscore=0 bulkscore=0 mlxlogscore=897 adultscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 phishscore=0 malwarescore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 suspectscore=0 priorityscore=1501 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2003020000 definitions=main-2003240050 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Dan Williams , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, LKML , Baoquan He , linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" > On 24-Mar-2020, at 2:45 PM, Aneesh Kumar K.V = wrote: >=20 > Sachin Sant writes: >=20 >> While running ndctl[1] tests against 5.6.0-rc7 following crash is = encountered. >>=20 >> Bisect leads me to commit d41e2f3bd546=20 >> mm/hotplug: fix hot remove failure in SPARSEMEM|!VMEMMAP case >>=20 >> Reverting this commit helps and the tests complete without any crash. >=20 >=20 > Can you try this change? >=20 > diff --git a/mm/sparse.c b/mm/sparse.c > index aadb7298dcef..3012d1f3771a 100644 > --- a/mm/sparse.c > +++ b/mm/sparse.c > @@ -781,6 +781,8 @@ static void section_deactivate(unsigned long pfn, = unsigned long nr_pages, > ms->usage =3D NULL; > } > memmap =3D sparse_decode_mem_map(ms->section_mem_map, = section_nr); > + /* Mark the section invalid */ > + ms->section_mem_map &=3D ~SECTION_HAS_MEM_MAP; > } >=20 > if (section_is_early && memmap) >=20 This patch works for me. The test ran successfully without any = crash/failure. Thanks -Sachin > a pfn_valid check involves pnf_section_valid() check if section is > having MEM_MAP. In this case we did end up setting the ms->uage =3D = NULL. > So when we do that tupdate the section to not have MEM_MAP. >=20 > -aneesh