LinuxPPC-Dev Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / Atom feed
From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
To: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>,
	Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com>
Cc: andmike@us.ibm.com, mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
	b.zolnierkie@samsung.com, jasowang@redhat.com, aik@linux.ibm.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, paul.burton@mips.com,
	sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	hch@lst.de, m.szyprowski@samsung.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dma-mapping: Add dma_addr_is_phys_addr()
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2019 11:29:24 +0100
Message-ID: <37609731-5539-b906-aa94-2ef0242795ac@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191014045139.GN4080@umbus.fritz.box>

On 14/10/2019 05:51, David Gibson wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 06:25:18PM -0700, Ram Pai wrote:
>> From: Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@linux.ibm.com>
>>
>> In order to safely use the DMA API, virtio needs to know whether DMA
>> addresses are in fact physical addresses and for that purpose,
>> dma_addr_is_phys_addr() is introduced.
>>
>> cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
>> cc: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
>> cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
>> cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
>> cc: Michael Roth <mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> cc: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@linux.ibm.com>
>> cc: Paul Burton <paul.burton@mips.com>
>> cc: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
>> cc: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>
>> cc: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
>> cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
>> Suggested-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@linux.ibm.com>
> 
> The change itself looks ok, so
> 
> Reviewed-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
> 
> However, I would like to see the commit message (and maybe the inline
> comments) expanded a bit on what the distinction here is about.  Some
> of the text from the next patch would be suitable, about DMA addresses
> usually being in a different address space but not in the case of
> bounce buffering.

Right, this needs a much tighter definition. "DMA address happens to be 
a valid physical address" is true of various IOMMU setups too, but I 
can't believe it's meaningful in such cases.

If what you actually want is "DMA is direct or SWIOTLB" - i.e. "DMA 
address is physical address of DMA data (not necessarily the original 
buffer)" - wouldn't dma_is_direct() suffice?

Robin.

>> ---
>>   arch/powerpc/include/asm/dma-mapping.h | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
>>   arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/Kconfig |  1 +
>>   include/linux/dma-mapping.h            | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
>>   kernel/dma/Kconfig                     |  3 +++
>>   4 files changed, 45 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/dma-mapping.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/dma-mapping.h
>> index 565d6f7..f92c0a4b 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/dma-mapping.h
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/dma-mapping.h
>> @@ -5,6 +5,8 @@
>>   #ifndef _ASM_DMA_MAPPING_H
>>   #define _ASM_DMA_MAPPING_H
>>   
>> +#include <asm/svm.h>
>> +
>>   static inline const struct dma_map_ops *get_arch_dma_ops(struct bus_type *bus)
>>   {
>>   	/* We don't handle the NULL dev case for ISA for now. We could
>> @@ -15,4 +17,23 @@ static inline const struct dma_map_ops *get_arch_dma_ops(struct bus_type *bus)
>>   	return NULL;
>>   }
>>   
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_DMA_ADDR_IS_PHYS_ADDR
>> +/**
>> + * dma_addr_is_phys_addr - check whether a device DMA address is a physical
>> + *		address
>> + * @dev:	device to check
>> + *
>> + * Returns %true if any DMA address for this device happens to also be a valid
>> + * physical address (not necessarily of the same page).
>> + */
>> +static inline bool dma_addr_is_phys_addr(struct device *dev)
>> +{
>> +	/*
>> +	 * Secure guests always use the SWIOTLB, therefore DMA addresses are
>> +	 * actually the physical address of the bounce buffer.
>> +	 */
>> +	return is_secure_guest();
>> +}
>> +#endif
>> +
>>   #endif	/* _ASM_DMA_MAPPING_H */
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/Kconfig b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/Kconfig
>> index 9e35cdd..0108150 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/Kconfig
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/Kconfig
>> @@ -152,6 +152,7 @@ config PPC_SVM
>>   	select SWIOTLB
>>   	select ARCH_HAS_MEM_ENCRYPT
>>   	select ARCH_HAS_FORCE_DMA_UNENCRYPTED
>> +	select ARCH_HAS_DMA_ADDR_IS_PHYS_ADDR
>>   	help
>>   	 There are certain POWER platforms which support secure guests using
>>   	 the Protected Execution Facility, with the help of an Ultravisor
>> diff --git a/include/linux/dma-mapping.h b/include/linux/dma-mapping.h
>> index f7d1eea..6df5664 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/dma-mapping.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/dma-mapping.h
>> @@ -693,6 +693,26 @@ static inline bool dma_addressing_limited(struct device *dev)
>>   			    dma_get_required_mask(dev);
>>   }
>>   
>> +#ifndef CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_DMA_ADDR_IS_PHYS_ADDR
>> +/**
>> + * dma_addr_is_phys_addr - check whether a device DMA address is a physical
>> + *		address
>> + * @dev:	device to check
>> + *
>> + * Returns %true if any DMA address for this device happens to also be a valid
>> + * physical address (not necessarily of the same page).
>> + */
>> +static inline bool dma_addr_is_phys_addr(struct device *dev)
>> +{
>> +	/*
>> +	 * Except in very specific setups, DMA addresses exist in a different
>> +	 * address space from CPU physical addresses and cannot be directly used
>> +	 * to reference system memory.
>> +	 */
>> +	return false;
>> +}
>> +#endif
>> +
>>   #ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_SETUP_DMA_OPS
>>   void arch_setup_dma_ops(struct device *dev, u64 dma_base, u64 size,
>>   		const struct iommu_ops *iommu, bool coherent);
>> diff --git a/kernel/dma/Kconfig b/kernel/dma/Kconfig
>> index 9decbba..6209b46 100644
>> --- a/kernel/dma/Kconfig
>> +++ b/kernel/dma/Kconfig
>> @@ -51,6 +51,9 @@ config ARCH_HAS_DMA_MMAP_PGPROT
>>   config ARCH_HAS_FORCE_DMA_UNENCRYPTED
>>   	bool
>>   
>> +config ARCH_HAS_DMA_ADDR_IS_PHYS_ADDR
>> +	bool
>> +
>>   config DMA_NONCOHERENT_CACHE_SYNC
>>   	bool
>>   
> 

  reply index

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-10-12  1:25 [PATCH 0/2] virtio: Support encrypted memory on powerpc secure guests Ram Pai
2019-10-12  1:25 ` [PATCH 1/2] dma-mapping: Add dma_addr_is_phys_addr() Ram Pai
2019-10-12  1:25   ` [PATCH 2/2] virtio_ring: Use DMA API if memory is encrypted Ram Pai
2019-10-14  4:52     ` David Gibson
2019-10-15  7:35     ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-10-16  7:55       ` Ram Pai
2019-10-17  2:33       ` Jason Wang
2019-10-21  8:36       ` David Gibson
2019-10-14  4:51   ` [PATCH 1/2] dma-mapping: Add dma_addr_is_phys_addr() David Gibson
2019-10-14 10:29     ` Robin Murphy [this message]
2019-10-15  7:30       ` Ram Pai
2019-10-15  7:31       ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-10-12  1:36 ` [PATCH 0/2] virtio: Support encrypted memory on powerpc secure guests Ram Pai

Reply instructions:

You may reply publically to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=37609731-5539-b906-aa94-2ef0242795ac@arm.com \
    --to=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=aik@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=andmike@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=b.zolnierkie@samsung.com \
    --cc=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=linuxram@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
    --cc=mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=paul.burton@mips.com \
    --cc=sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

LinuxPPC-Dev Archive on lore.kernel.org

Archives are clonable:
	git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/linuxppc-dev/0 linuxppc-dev/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 linuxppc-dev linuxppc-dev/ https://lore.kernel.org/linuxppc-dev \
		linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
	public-inbox-index linuxppc-dev

Example config snippet for mirrors

Newsgroup available over NNTP:
	nntp://nntp.lore.kernel.org/org.ozlabs.lists.linuxppc-dev


AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git