From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1813AC33CA9 for ; Mon, 13 Jan 2020 15:50:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8127C207FD for ; Mon, 13 Jan 2020 15:50:34 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="LDxUG2A4" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 8127C207FD Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47xJ2b4BlvzDqDm for ; Tue, 14 Jan 2020 02:50:31 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=kernel.org (client-ip=198.145.29.99; helo=mail.kernel.org; envelope-from=timur@kernel.org; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=default header.b=LDxUG2A4; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47xJ011PlRzDqDL for ; Tue, 14 Jan 2020 02:48:17 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from [192.168.1.20] (cpe-24-28-70-126.austin.res.rr.com [24.28.70.126]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BF6BB207FD; Mon, 13 Jan 2020 15:48:13 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1578930494; bh=64Y2efURakSLcN1lwIcBrqwPysF/1NY6SU6961vQ4U0=; h=Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=LDxUG2A4vSZEYOIHnyY94+K3xXGkoYr/z8jCLp2hY4S+xURYXjlU+6ifHpDGe9GRZ R96F5O152C+D80khk3hT/J7ejEpPxWp87gRdqvAwubZ6DzY4ed1C7gI0m5YOLI1Ky+ qqLpvdSVjiOFUCoGpCGXI7eymqBbjDDT91GLecO8= Subject: Re: [PATCH] evh_bytechan: fix out of bounds accesses To: Laurentiu Tudor , Michael Ellerman , Stephen Rothwell , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Jiri Slaby , Scott Wood , York Sun , "b08248@gmail.com" References: <20200109183912.5fcb52aa@canb.auug.org.au> <8736cj8rvr.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au> <5f17b997-8a6c-841e-8868-c0877750e598@kernel.org> <47d31d84-78ed-fd90-f3d9-8ce968126497@nxp.com> From: Timur Tabi Message-ID: <40f99b1b-0fe8-70a2-66e3-f42d51af581e@kernel.org> Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2020 09:48:12 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.3.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <47d31d84-78ed-fd90-f3d9-8ce968126497@nxp.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Diana Madalina Craciun , PowerPC Mailing List Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On 1/13/20 8:34 AM, Laurentiu Tudor wrote: > There are a few users that I know of, but I can't tell if that's enough > to justify keeping the driver. > > [1]https://source.codeaurora.org/external/qoriq/qoriq-yocto-sdk/hypervisor/ IIRC, the driver is the only reasonable way to get a serial console from a guest. So if there are users of the hypervisor, then I think there's a good chance at least one is using the byte channel driver.