From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B895CA9EAE for ; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 22:52:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B4D0720659 for ; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 22:52:56 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=rasmusvillemoes.dk header.i=@rasmusvillemoes.dk header.b="IpOq05N4" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org B4D0720659 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=rasmusvillemoes.dk Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from bilbo.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 472n120q9xzF3dZ for ; Wed, 30 Oct 2019 09:52:54 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=rasmusvillemoes.dk (client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::344; helo=mail-wm1-x344.google.com; envelope-from=linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=rasmusvillemoes.dk Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=rasmusvillemoes.dk header.i=@rasmusvillemoes.dk header.b="IpOq05N4"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mail-wm1-x344.google.com (mail-wm1-x344.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::344]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 472myh2X3SzF346 for ; Wed, 30 Oct 2019 09:50:50 +1100 (AEDT) Received: by mail-wm1-x344.google.com with SMTP id g24so73529wmh.5 for ; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 15:50:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rasmusvillemoes.dk; s=google; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=btcO2kbQzjWCRPlDPp2ih4Wwes8/F4qc3tgqqhv/xx8=; b=IpOq05N4KjE4zg1oC5O7H20w97yojnP1buo5WYqtlFfYFF3MNAXbfZtKUaRR23Hev5 MfdWZAUKaGTCTo5ws7T0XlnPU1wZZYu25+voj37P/E9iHJQjeESf9QY7McgoJIrMwVSn +V5iqH6DXsiTXkyN/6pPQ5/cnKEegZm2BKZzI= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=btcO2kbQzjWCRPlDPp2ih4Wwes8/F4qc3tgqqhv/xx8=; b=XP1dDAtauc9usZImYIAJw1QVwam1OnbOPneAbYjbMSl7kD712Y0spQnzPpjr/qnEJx z+FMhBWHn6ynhKlgLr7i7X6XC5CJ0HlqMlMsWi8Mw6Pqy/Ox4Y1122lb92EZRCK/5zmC 4HBYZhtesu+TBgdRkmG17cRrQBg0/n9vvksY1JFTThzjpM3FsvbnRqCwrUD85nvCjaX6 QI69bz+sJEhfY9Zn0Gx4HUKV8C23JTuG+bU4A/qpEQPzcmhcs4vgwfOBdblEYDSoUFQd H0z3ZxrY4+TVQ+VpgzCAwluwA6LMraO6GxmDtOMMuhsDIylRi8djp+6TF1+9OcIjiMwC PaYA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXwtVYa/exBVg/93xQ5GQjgbnK5PbcoQRXzC5H0CcfG/s8Sd8oE d8lm3lvw7NxTVmKdP81NHhV0pw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwvFUOZBquoDvuOipQqVhVeJTxzpP1yQP9WQ69QCPwyrvLFWnlerZKyvn/QDEJrMiW4edqnQA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:350:: with SMTP id u16mr5802601wmd.160.1572389444332; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 15:50:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.149] (ip-5-186-115-54.cgn.fibianet.dk. [5.186.115.54]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x7sm903106wrg.63.2019.10.29.15.50.43 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 29 Oct 2019 15:50:43 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 20/23] serial: make SERIAL_QE depend on PPC32 To: Leo Li , Qiang Zhao , Christophe Leroy References: <20191018125234.21825-1-linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> <20191025124058.22580-1-linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> <20191025124058.22580-21-linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> From: Rasmus Villemoes Message-ID: <42d151c0-bbf9-62a5-5930-70d62418bb84@rasmusvillemoes.dk> Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2019 23:50:42 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Valentin Longchamp , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Scott Wood , "linux-serial@vger.kernel.org" , "linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On 29/10/2019 23.44, Leo Li wrote: > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Rasmus Villemoes >> Sent: Friday, October 25, 2019 7:41 AM >> To: Qiang Zhao ; Leo Li ; >> Christophe Leroy >> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org; linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; >> linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Scott Wood ; Valentin >> Longchamp ; Rasmus Villemoes >> ; linux-serial@vger.kernel.org >> Subject: [PATCH v2 20/23] serial: make SERIAL_QE depend on PPC32 >> >> Currently SERIAL_QE depends on QUICC_ENGINE, which in turn depends on >> PPC32, so this doesn't add any extra dependency. However, the QUICC >> Engine IP block also exists on some arm boards, so this serves as preparation >> for removing the PPC32 dependency from QUICC_ENGINE and build the QE >> support in drivers/soc/fsl/qe, while preventing allmodconfig/randconfig >> failures due to SERIAL_QE not being supported yet. >> >> Signed-off-by: Rasmus Villemoes > > I think your purpose of this series is to make the QE UART not depending on PPC32. If it does accomplish that then we don't need this change. Yeah, as I've said in private, I now have the patches to make this work, so this patch (and the later one removing it again) are both gone from my current dev branch. I'll still wait a day or two to allow the ppc people to respond to the inline/OOL iowrite32be issue, but after that I'll resend the whole series. Rasmus