From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FC1AC0650E for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2019 02:03:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3A63B2053B for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2019 02:03:41 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 3A63B2053B Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=ellerman.id.au Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45hpdl3XMJzDqDN for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2019 12:03:39 +1000 (AEST) Received: from ozlabs.org (bilbo.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::2]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 45hng66j5fzDqQM for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2019 11:19:46 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=ellerman.id.au Received: by ozlabs.org (Postfix, from userid 1034) id 45hng56x6Zz9sPM; Mon, 8 Jul 2019 11:19:45 +1000 (AEST) X-powerpc-patch-notification: thanks X-powerpc-patch-commit: ea9f5b702fe0215188fba2eda117419e4ae90a67 In-Reply-To: <20190701143626.17628-1-aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com> To: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" , npiggin@gmail.com, paulus@samba.org From: Michael Ellerman Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] powerpc/mm/drconf: Use NUMA_NO_NODE on failures instead of node 0 Message-Id: <45hng56x6Zz9sPM@ozlabs.org> Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2019 11:19:45 +1000 (AEST) X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Vaibhav Jain , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, "Aneesh Kumar K.V" Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On Mon, 2019-07-01 at 14:36:24 UTC, "Aneesh Kumar K.V" wrote: > If we fail to parse the associativity array we should default to > NUMA_NO_NODE instead of NODE 0. Rest of the code fallback to the > right default if we find the numa node value NUMA_NO_NODE. > > Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V Series applied to powerpc next, thanks. https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/ea9f5b702fe0215188fba2eda117419e4ae90a67 cheers