linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
To: Timur Tabi <timur@freescale.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, dan.j.williams@intel.com,
	Li Yang <leoli@freescale.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] fsl-dma: allow Freescale Elo DMA driver to be compiled as a module
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2008 15:16:44 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <48DBF1AC.9060909@freescale.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <48DBE1E1.6030709@freescale.com>

Timur Tabi wrote:
> Scott Wood wrote:
> 
>>> I chose subsys_initcall() to increase the probability that fsldma is
>>> already present when DMA clients are loaded/initialized and register.
>> If there's no dependency, why does it matter whether fsldma is already 
>> present?
> 
> Re-read my explanation, please.

I read it just fine the first time.

> Technically, it doesn't *matter* in that
> nothing will break, but so what?  It's nicer if the DMA driver is already
> available when the client drivers load, so that they can use the DMA facilities
> right away.

It's not nicer to people reading the code and wondering why, or to 
people who use it as a module and execute less-well-tested code paths, 
and I doubt it's a significant addition to boot time to do things in the 
normal way.

I'm not particularly worried about the code going on strike because 
we're not being "nice" to it.

-Scott

  reply	other threads:[~2008-09-25 20:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-09-24 21:59 [PATCH v2] fsl-dma: allow Freescale Elo DMA driver to be compiled as a module Timur Tabi
2008-09-25  6:54 ` Li Yang
2008-09-25 13:54   ` Timur Tabi
2008-09-25 18:40     ` Scott Wood
2008-09-25 18:47       ` Timur Tabi
2008-09-25 19:00         ` Scott Wood
2008-09-25 19:09           ` Timur Tabi
2008-09-25 20:16             ` Scott Wood [this message]
2008-09-27 18:13 ` Dan Williams

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=48DBF1AC.9060909@freescale.com \
    --to=scottwood@freescale.com \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=leoli@freescale.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=timur@freescale.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).