From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from e8.ny.us.ibm.com (e8.ny.us.ibm.com [32.97.182.138]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "e8.ny.us.ibm.com", Issuer "Equifax" (verified OK)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E661CB70E5 for ; Fri, 23 Jul 2010 04:36:53 +1000 (EST) Received: from d01relay07.pok.ibm.com (d01relay07.pok.ibm.com [9.56.227.147]) by e8.ny.us.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1) with ESMTP id o6MIYiY7026921 for ; Thu, 22 Jul 2010 14:34:44 -0400 Received: from d01av02.pok.ibm.com (d01av02.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.216]) by d01relay07.pok.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id o6MIaPYv1581128 for ; Thu, 22 Jul 2010 14:36:25 -0400 Received: from d01av02.pok.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d01av02.pok.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id o6MIaNjG028081 for ; Thu, 22 Jul 2010 15:36:25 -0300 Message-ID: <4C488FA4.6050009@us.ibm.com> Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2010 11:36:20 -0700 From: Darren Hart MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFC] preempt_count corruption across H_CEDE call with CONFIG_PREEMPT on pseries References: <4C488CCD.60004@us.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <4C488CCD.60004@us.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Cc: Stephen Rothwell , Gautham R Shenoy , Steven Rostedt , Will Schmidt , Paul Mackerras , Thomas Gleixner List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On 07/22/2010 11:24 AM, Darren Hart wrote: > The following patch is most certainly not correct, but it does eliminate > the situation on mainline 100% of the time (there is still a 25% > reproduction rate on PREEMPT_RT). Can someone comment on: Apologies. This particular issue is also 100% eliminated on PREEMPT_RT. We hit another issue possibly unrelated to this 25% of time. Please disregard the comment regarding 25% failure on PREEMPT_RT. -- Darren Hart IBM Linux Technology Center Real-Time Linux Team