linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Darren Hart <dvhltc@us.ibm.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
	Gautham R Shenoy <ego@in.ibm.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Will Schmidt <willschm@us.ibm.com>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFC] preempt_count corruption across H_CEDE call with CONFIG_PREEMPT on pseries
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2010 15:36:20 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C61D464.5090307@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1007222028420.2616@localhost.localdomain>

On 07/22/2010 11:38 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Jul 2010, Darren Hart wrote:
>
>> Also of interest is that this path
>> cpu_idle()->cpu_die()->pseries_mach_cpu_die() to start_secondary()
>> enters with a preempt_count=1 if it wasn't corrupted across the hcall.
>
> That triggers the problem as well. preempt_count needs to be 0 when
> entering start_secondary(). So I really wonder how that ever worked.
>
>> The early boot path from _start however appears to call
>> start_secondary() with a preempt_count of 0.
>
> Which is correct.
>
>> The following patch is most certainly not correct, but it does eliminate
>
> It is correct, but i think it is incomplete as other portions of the
> thread_info on the stack might be in some weird state as well.

Just FYI, I took a look at the stack pointers as well as all the fields 
in the thread_info struct. The only one that changes is preempt_count. 
The previous value of preempt_count doesn't impact the value after cede. 
An initial value of 0, 1, or 4 all result in an after-cede value of 
0xffffffff. I also added 32 bits of padding on either side of the 
preempt_count in case the change was accidental - it wasnt', the padded 
values remained unchanged across the cede call while the preempt_count 
still changed to 0xffffffff.


-- 
Darren Hart
IBM Linux Technology Center
Real-Time Linux Team

  reply	other threads:[~2010-08-10 22:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-07-22 18:24 [PATCH][RFC] preempt_count corruption across H_CEDE call with CONFIG_PREEMPT on pseries Darren Hart
2010-07-22 18:36 ` Darren Hart
2010-07-22 18:38 ` Thomas Gleixner
2010-08-10 22:36   ` Darren Hart [this message]
2010-07-22 22:25 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-07-22 23:57   ` Darren Hart
2010-07-23  4:44     ` Darren Hart
2010-07-23  5:08       ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2010-07-23  5:11         ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-07-23  7:07           ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2010-08-05  4:45             ` Darren Hart
2010-08-05 11:06               ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2010-08-05 12:26                 ` Thomas Gleixner
2010-07-23  5:09       ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-08-06  2:19         ` Darren Hart
2010-08-06  5:09           ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2010-08-06  7:13             ` Darren Hart
2010-07-23 14:39     ` Will Schmidt
2010-08-04 13:44   ` Darren Hart
2010-08-19 15:58 ` Ankita Garg
2010-08-19 18:58   ` Will Schmidt
2010-08-23 22:20   ` Darren Hart
2010-08-31  7:12   ` Darren Hart
2010-09-01  5:54     ` Michael Ellerman
2010-09-01 15:10       ` Darren Hart
2010-09-01 18:47         ` Darren Hart
2010-09-01 19:59           ` Steven Rostedt
2010-09-01 20:42             ` Darren Hart
2010-09-02  1:02               ` Michael Neuling
2010-09-02  4:06                 ` Steven Rostedt
2010-09-02  6:04                   ` Darren Hart
2010-09-03 20:10                     ` Will Schmidt
2010-09-02 23:04                   ` Michael Neuling
2010-09-03  0:08                     ` Darren Hart
2010-09-02  3:46           ` Michael Neuling

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4C61D464.5090307@us.ibm.com \
    --to=dvhltc@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=ego@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=willschm@us.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).