linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jianguo Wu <wujianguo106@gmail.com>
To: wency@cn.fujitsu.com
Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org,
	len.brown@intel.com, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cmetcalf@tilera.com,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com,
	paulus@samba.org, minchan.kim@gmail.com,
	kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com, rientjes@google.com,
	sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, cl@linux.com,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	liuj97@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 10/12] memory-hotplug: memory_hotplug: clear zone when removing the memory
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2012 23:34:31 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <508EA207.2060205@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1350988250-31294-11-git-send-email-wency@cn.fujitsu.com>

On 2012/10/23 18:30, wency@cn.fujitsu.com wrote:
> From: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>
> 
> When a memory is added, we update zone's and pgdat's start_pfn and
> spanned_pages in the function __add_zone(). So we should revert them
> when the memory is removed.
> 
> The patch adds a new function __remove_zone() to do this.
> 
> CC: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
> CC: Jiang Liu <liuj97@gmail.com>
> CC: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
> CC: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
> Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>
> CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> CC: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
> Signed-off-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>
> Signed-off-by: Wen Congyang <wency@cn.fujitsu.com>
> ---
>  mm/memory_hotplug.c |  207 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 files changed, 207 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/memory_hotplug.c b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
> index 03153cf..55a228d 100644
> --- a/mm/memory_hotplug.c
> +++ b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
> @@ -312,10 +312,213 @@ static int __meminit __add_section(int nid, struct zone *zone,
>  	return register_new_memory(nid, __pfn_to_section(phys_start_pfn));
>  }
>  
> +/* find the smallest valid pfn in the range [start_pfn, end_pfn) */
> +static int find_smallest_section_pfn(int nid, struct zone *zone,
> +				     unsigned long start_pfn,
> +				     unsigned long end_pfn)
> +{
> +	struct mem_section *ms;
> +
> +	for (; start_pfn < end_pfn; start_pfn += PAGES_PER_SECTION) {
> +		ms = __pfn_to_section(start_pfn);
> +
> +		if (unlikely(!valid_section(ms)))
> +			continue;
> +
> +		if (unlikely(pfn_to_nid(start_pfn)) != nid)

if (unlikely(pfn_to_nid(start_pfn) != nid))

> +			continue;
> +
> +		if (zone && zone != page_zone(pfn_to_page(start_pfn)))
> +			continue;
> +
> +		return start_pfn;
> +	}
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +/* find the biggest valid pfn in the range [start_pfn, end_pfn). */
> +static int find_biggest_section_pfn(int nid, struct zone *zone,
> +				    unsigned long start_pfn,
> +				    unsigned long end_pfn)
> +{
> +	struct mem_section *ms;
> +	unsigned long pfn;
> +
> +	/* pfn is the end pfn of a memory section. */
> +	pfn = end_pfn - 1;
> +	for (; pfn >= start_pfn; pfn -= PAGES_PER_SECTION) {
> +		ms = __pfn_to_section(pfn);
> +
> +		if (unlikely(!valid_section(ms)))
> +			continue;
> +
> +		if (unlikely(pfn_to_nid(pfn)) != nid)

if (unlikely(pfn_to_nid(pfn) != nid))

> +			continue;
> +
> +		if (zone && zone != page_zone(pfn_to_page(pfn)))
> +			continue;
> +
> +		return pfn;
> +	}
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void shrink_zone_span(struct zone *zone, unsigned long start_pfn,
> +			     unsigned long end_pfn)
> +{
> +	unsigned long zone_start_pfn =  zone->zone_start_pfn;
> +	unsigned long zone_end_pfn = zone->zone_start_pfn + zone->spanned_pages;
> +	unsigned long pfn;
> +	struct mem_section *ms;
> +	int nid = zone_to_nid(zone);
> +
> +	zone_span_writelock(zone);
> +	if (zone_start_pfn == start_pfn) {
> +		/*
> +		 * If the section is smallest section in the zone, it need
> +		 * shrink zone->zone_start_pfn and zone->zone_spanned_pages.
> +		 * In this case, we find second smallest valid mem_section
> +		 * for shrinking zone.
> +		 */
> +		pfn = find_smallest_section_pfn(nid, zone, end_pfn,
> +						zone_end_pfn);
> +		if (pfn) {
> +			zone->zone_start_pfn = pfn;
> +			zone->spanned_pages = zone_end_pfn - pfn;
> +		}
> +	} else if (zone_end_pfn == end_pfn) {
> +		/*
> +		 * If the section is biggest section in the zone, it need
> +		 * shrink zone->spanned_pages.
> +		 * In this case, we find second biggest valid mem_section for
> +		 * shrinking zone.
> +		 */
> +		pfn = find_biggest_section_pfn(nid, zone, zone_start_pfn,
> +					       start_pfn);
> +		if (pfn)
> +			zone->spanned_pages = pfn - zone_start_pfn + 1;
> +	}
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * The section is not biggest or smallest mem_section in the zone, it
> +	 * only creates a hole in the zone. So in this case, we need not
> +	 * change the zone. But perhaps, the zone has only hole data. Thus
> +	 * it check the zone has only hole or not.
> +	 */
> +	pfn = zone_start_pfn;
> +	for (; pfn < zone_end_pfn; pfn += PAGES_PER_SECTION) {
> +		ms = __pfn_to_section(pfn);
> +
> +		if (unlikely(!valid_section(ms)))
> +			continue;
> +
> +		if (page_zone(pfn_to_page(pfn)) != zone)
> +			continue;
> +
> +		 /* If the section is current section, it continues the loop */
> +		if (start_pfn == pfn)
> +			continue;
> +
> +		/* If we find valid section, we have nothing to do */
> +		zone_span_writeunlock(zone);
> +		return;
> +	}
> +
> +	/* The zone has no valid section */
> +	zone->zone_start_pfn = 0;
> +	zone->spanned_pages = 0;
> +	zone_span_writeunlock(zone);
> +}
> +
> +static void shrink_pgdat_span(struct pglist_data *pgdat,
> +			      unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long end_pfn)
> +{
> +	unsigned long pgdat_start_pfn =  pgdat->node_start_pfn;
> +	unsigned long pgdat_end_pfn =
> +		pgdat->node_start_pfn + pgdat->node_spanned_pages;
> +	unsigned long pfn;
> +	struct mem_section *ms;
> +	int nid = pgdat->node_id;
> +
> +	if (pgdat_start_pfn == start_pfn) {
> +		/*
> +		 * If the section is smallest section in the pgdat, it need
> +		 * shrink pgdat->node_start_pfn and pgdat->node_spanned_pages.
> +		 * In this case, we find second smallest valid mem_section
> +		 * for shrinking zone.
> +		 */
> +		pfn = find_smallest_section_pfn(nid, NULL, end_pfn,
> +						pgdat_end_pfn);
> +		if (pfn) {
> +			pgdat->node_start_pfn = pfn;
> +			pgdat->node_spanned_pages = pgdat_end_pfn - pfn;
> +		}
> +	} else if (pgdat_end_pfn == end_pfn) {
> +		/*
> +		 * If the section is biggest section in the pgdat, it need
> +		 * shrink pgdat->node_spanned_pages.
> +		 * In this case, we find second biggest valid mem_section for
> +		 * shrinking zone.
> +		 */
> +		pfn = find_biggest_section_pfn(nid, NULL, pgdat_start_pfn,
> +					       start_pfn);
> +		if (pfn)
> +			pgdat->node_spanned_pages = pfn - pgdat_start_pfn + 1;
> +	}
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * If the section is not biggest or smallest mem_section in the pgdat,
> +	 * it only creates a hole in the pgdat. So in this case, we need not
> +	 * change the pgdat.
> +	 * But perhaps, the pgdat has only hole data. Thus it check the pgdat
> +	 * has only hole or not.
> +	 */
> +	pfn = pgdat_start_pfn;
> +	for (; pfn < pgdat_end_pfn; pfn += PAGES_PER_SECTION) {
> +		ms = __pfn_to_section(pfn);
> +
> +		if (unlikely(!valid_section(ms)))
> +			continue;
> +
> +		if (pfn_to_nid(pfn) != nid)
> +			continue;
> +
> +		 /* If the section is current section, it continues the loop */
> +		if (start_pfn == pfn)
> +			continue;
> +
> +		/* If we find valid section, we have nothing to do */
> +		return;
> +	}
> +
> +	/* The pgdat has no valid section */
> +	pgdat->node_start_pfn = 0;
> +	pgdat->node_spanned_pages = 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void __remove_zone(struct zone *zone, unsigned long start_pfn)
> +{
> +	struct pglist_data *pgdat = zone->zone_pgdat;
> +	int nr_pages = PAGES_PER_SECTION;
> +	int zone_type;
> +	unsigned long flags;
> +
> +	zone_type = zone - pgdat->node_zones;
> +
> +	pgdat_resize_lock(zone->zone_pgdat, &flags);
> +	shrink_zone_span(zone, start_pfn, start_pfn + nr_pages);
> +	shrink_pgdat_span(pgdat, start_pfn, start_pfn + nr_pages);
> +	pgdat_resize_unlock(zone->zone_pgdat, &flags);
> +}
> +
>  static int __remove_section(struct zone *zone, struct mem_section *ms)
>  {
>  	unsigned long flags;
>  	struct pglist_data *pgdat = zone->zone_pgdat;
> +	unsigned long start_pfn;
> +	int scn_nr;
>  	int ret = -EINVAL;
>  
>  	if (!valid_section(ms))
> @@ -325,6 +528,10 @@ static int __remove_section(struct zone *zone, struct mem_section *ms)
>  	if (ret)
>  		return ret;
>  
> +	scn_nr = __section_nr(ms);
> +	start_pfn = section_nr_to_pfn(scn_nr);
> +	__remove_zone(zone, start_pfn);
> +
>  	pgdat_resize_lock(pgdat, &flags);
>  	sparse_remove_one_section(zone, ms);
>  	pgdat_resize_unlock(pgdat, &flags);
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2012-10-29 15:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-10-23 10:30 [PATCH v2 00/12] memory-hotplug: hot-remove physical memory wency
2012-10-23 10:30 ` Ni zhan Chen
2012-10-23 10:39   ` Wen Congyang
2012-10-23 10:30 ` [PATCH v2 01/12] memory-hotplug: try to offline the memory twice to avoid dependence wency
2012-10-23 10:30 ` [PATCH v2 02/12] memory-hotplug: check whether all memory blocks are offlined or not when removing memory wency
2012-10-23 10:30 ` [PATCH v2 03/12] memory-hotplug: remove redundant codes wency
2012-10-23 10:30 ` [PATCH v2 04/12] memory-hotplug: remove /sys/firmware/memmap/X sysfs wency
2012-10-23 10:30 ` [PATCH v2 05/12] memory-hotplug: introduce new function arch_remove_memory() for removing page table depends on architecture wency
2012-10-23 10:30 ` [PATCH v2 06/12] memory-hotplug: unregister memory section on SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP wency
2012-10-23 10:30 ` [PATCH v2 07/12] memory-hotplug: implement register_page_bootmem_info_section of sparse-vmemmap wency
2012-10-23 10:30 ` [PATCH v2 08/12] memory-hotplug: remove memmap " wency
2012-10-23 10:30 ` [PATCH v2 09/12] memory-hotplug: remove page table of x86_64 architecture wency
2012-10-23 10:30 ` [PATCH v2 10/12] memory-hotplug: memory_hotplug: clear zone when removing the memory wency
2012-10-29 15:34   ` Jianguo Wu [this message]
2012-10-30  1:50     ` Wen Congyang
2012-11-07  7:40   ` [PATCH] Update start_pfn in zone and pg_data when spanned_pages == 0 Tang Chen
2012-10-23 10:30 ` [PATCH v2 11/12] memory-hotplug: remove sysfs file of node wency
2012-10-23 10:30 ` [PATCH v2 12/12] memory-hotplug: free node_data when a node is offlined wency

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=508EA207.2060205@gmail.com \
    --to=wujianguo106@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=cl@linux.com \
    --cc=cmetcalf@tilera.com \
    --cc=isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=len.brown@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=liuj97@gmail.com \
    --cc=minchan.kim@gmail.com \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=wency@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).