From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C584C388F7 for ; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 11:20:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AFA5D246BA for ; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 11:20:50 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="K+xPihw0"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="K+xPihw0" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org AFA5D246BA Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from bilbo.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CLmN04vVczDqT2 for ; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 22:20:48 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com (client-ip=216.205.24.124; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com; envelope-from=david@redhat.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=K+xPihw0; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=K+xPihw0; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [216.205.24.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CLmJg3K86zDq9J for ; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 22:17:55 +1100 (AEDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1603883872; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=3/QY+frjp1dnSTegbpUI0625UXdGYc+dVdsYJMjhKKw=; b=K+xPihw0cifYvMBWU7SzlMaRJfKqCzAXBJpfQcPlfRW//SiL6XkN0IWu37P6Ju9V3uOCgj qlRSURdYj17gT5tMuh/HfNo3tSRgye70KEhf1gujN/sHJLjJvgCgzwY0w0SPfsqojKkDIv DBl1UxdP1AVYINm2UQjJ+Qb7qP4tQOo= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1603883872; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=3/QY+frjp1dnSTegbpUI0625UXdGYc+dVdsYJMjhKKw=; b=K+xPihw0cifYvMBWU7SzlMaRJfKqCzAXBJpfQcPlfRW//SiL6XkN0IWu37P6Ju9V3uOCgj qlRSURdYj17gT5tMuh/HfNo3tSRgye70KEhf1gujN/sHJLjJvgCgzwY0w0SPfsqojKkDIv DBl1UxdP1AVYINm2UQjJ+Qb7qP4tQOo= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-195-5Kg-MYA4O2aB4WCrNYOgXA-1; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 07:17:50 -0400 X-MC-Unique: 5Kg-MYA4O2aB4WCrNYOgXA-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 90BEC809DE4; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 11:17:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.36.114.138] (ovpn-114-138.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.114.138]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 033EC6EF5E; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 11:17:35 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] arch, mm: improve robustness of direct map manipulation To: Mike Rapoport References: <20201025101555.3057-1-rppt@kernel.org> <20201026090526.GA1154158@kernel.org> <20201027083816.GG1154158@kernel.org> <20201028110945.GE1428094@kernel.org> From: David Hildenbrand Organization: Red Hat GmbH Message-ID: <5805fdd9-14e5-141c-773b-c46d2da57258@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2020 12:17:35 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20201028110945.GE1428094@kernel.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.13 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: "peterz@infradead.org" , "catalin.marinas@arm.com" , "dave.hansen@linux.intel.com" , "linux-mm@kvack.org" , "paulus@samba.org" , "pavel@ucw.cz" , "hpa@zytor.com" , "sparclinux@vger.kernel.org" , "cl@linux.com" , "will@kernel.org" , "linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-s390@vger.kernel.org" , "x86@kernel.org" , "rppt@linux.ibm.com" , "borntraeger@de.ibm.com" , "mingo@redhat.com" , "rientjes@google.com" , "Brown, Len" , "aou@eecs.berkeley.edu" , "gor@linux.ibm.com" , "linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" , "hca@linux.ibm.com" , "bp@alien8.de" , "luto@kernel.org" , "paul.walmsley@sifive.com" , "kirill@shutemov.name" , "tglx@linutronix.de" , "iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "rjw@rjwysocki.net" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "penberg@kernel.org" , "palmer@dabbelt.com" , "akpm@linux-foundation.org" , "Edgecombe, Rick P" , "linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" , "davem@davemloft.net" Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On 28.10.20 12:09, Mike Rapoport wrote: > On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 09:46:35AM +0100, David Hildenbrand wrote: >> On 27.10.20 09:38, Mike Rapoport wrote: >>> On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 06:05:30PM +0000, Edgecombe, Rick P wrote: >>> >>>> Beyond whatever you are seeing, for the latter case of new things >>>> getting introduced to an interface with hidden dependencies... Another >>>> edge case could be a new caller to set_memory_np() could result in >>>> large NP pages. None of the callers today should cause this AFAICT, but >>>> it's not great to rely on the callers to know these details. > >>> A caller of set_memory_*() or set_direct_map_*() should expect a failure >>> and be ready for that. So adding a WARN to safe_copy_page() is the first >>> step in that direction :) >>> >> >> I am probably missing something important, but why are we saving/restoring >> the content of pages that were explicitly removed from the identity mapping >> such that nobody will access them? > > Actually, we should not be saving/restoring free pages during > hibernation as there are several calls to mark_free_pages() that should > exclude the free pages from the snapshot. I've tried to find why the fix > that maps/unmaps a page to save it was required at the first place, but > I could not find bug reports. > > The closest I've got is an email from Rafael that asked to update > "hibernate: handle DEBUG_PAGEALLOC" patch: > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/200802200133.44098.rjw@sisk.pl/ > > Could it be that safe_copy_page() tries to workaround a non-existent > problem? > Clould be! Also see https://lkml.kernel.org/r/38de5bb0-5559-d069-0ce0-daec66ef2746@suse.cz which restores free page content based on more kernel parameters, not based on the original content. -- Thanks, David / dhildenb