linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
Cc: maddy@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
	Nageswara Sastry <rnsastry@linux.ibm.com>,
	Kajol Jain <kjain@linux.ibm.com>,
	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
	linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
	Disha Goel <disgoel@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] tools/perf/tests: Fix string substitutions in build id test
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2023 17:29:36 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5CAD9B57-1788-4C7E-9658-7634A49D8BF0@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAP-5=fXWCYQSpp92L64+7Piu0sfEq+RsigNLUowgCjsT218jow@mail.gmail.com>



> On 16-Jan-2023, at 11:47 AM, Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> wrote:
> 
> On Sun, Jan 15, 2023 at 9:03 PM Athira Rajeev
> <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> On 28-Sep-2022, at 10:24 AM, Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi All,
>>> 
>>> Looking for what direction we can take here.
>>> Do we want to change all tests in tools/perf/tests/shell except test_intel_pt.sh to use "bash" or go with
>>> the approach in the patch ? Please share your comments
>>> 
>>> Thanks
>>> Athira
>>> 
>> 
>> Hi All,
>> 
>> Looking for what direction we can take here.
>> Do we want to change all tests in tools/perf/tests/shell except test_intel_pt.sh to use "bash" or go with
>> the approach in the patch ? Please share your comments
>> 
>> Thanks
>> Athira
> 

Thanks Ian for the response.

> I think some of what the patch is doing is good, some of it the

Ian, can I take this as an ack for the patch so that Arnaldo can pick this in acme git ?

> readability becomes a little harder by not being bash. I'm agnostic as
> to which approach to take for the fix.

May be we can take this as separate mail thread to get everyone’s opinion on changing all tests in "tools/perf/tests/shell" except test_intel_pt.sh to use “bash" ?

> 
> An aside, I noticed that we do run some tests at build time:
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/acme/linux.git/tree/lib/Makefile?h=perf/core#n390
> So perhaps we can have a shellcheck build option, defaulted off but
> enabled as part of Arnaldo's regular test scripts. The shellcheck
> build option would run shellcheck to make sure that there weren't
> errors in the shell code, which it is far too easy to introduce.

Sure, that is a good option to have. I will check on having “shellcheck" as a build option.

Thanks
Athira

> 
> Thanks,
> Ian
> 
>>>> On 23-Sep-2022, at 11:54 AM, Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> On 22/09/22 22:15, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
>>>>> Em Wed, Sep 21, 2022 at 10:38:38PM +0530, Athira Rajeev escreveu:
>>>>>> The perf test named “build id cache operations” skips with below
>>>>>> error on some distros:
>>>>> 
>>>>> I wonder if we shouldn't instead state that bash is needed?
>>>>> 
>>>>> ⬢[acme@toolbox perf-urgent]$ head -1 tools/perf/tests/shell/*.sh | grep ^#
>>>>> #!/bin/sh
>>>>> #!/bin/bash
>>>>> #!/bin/sh
>>>>> #!/bin/sh
>>>>> #!/bin/sh
>>>>> #!/bin/sh
>>>>> #!/bin/sh
>>>>> #!/bin/sh
>>>>> #!/bin/sh
>>>>> #!/bin/sh
>>>>> #!/bin/bash
>>>>> #!/bin/sh
>>>>> #!/bin/sh
>>>>> #!/bin/sh
>>>>> #!/bin/bash
>>>>> #!/bin/sh
>>>>> #!/bin/bash
>>>>> #!/bin/sh
>>>>> #!/bin/sh
>>>>> #!/bin/sh
>>>>> #!/bin/sh
>>>>> #!/bin/sh
>>>>> #!/bin/sh
>>>>> #!/bin/sh
>>>>> #!/bin/sh
>>>>> #!/bin/sh
>>>>> ⬢[acme@toolbox perf-urgent]$
>>>>> 
>>>>> Opinions?
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Please don't change tools/perf/tests/shell/test_intel_pt.sh
>>>> 
>>>> I started using shellcheck on that with the "perf test:
>>>> test_intel_pt.sh: Add per-thread test" patch set that I sent.
>>>> 
>>>> FYI, if you use shellcheck on buildid.sh, it shows up issues even
>>>> after changing to bash:
>>>> 
>>>> *** Before ***
>>>> 
>>>> $ shellcheck -S warning tools/perf/tests/shell/buildid.sh
>>>> 
>>>> In tools/perf/tests/shell/buildid.sh line 69:
>>>>      link=${build_id_dir}/.build-id/${id:0:2}/${id:2}
>>>>                                     ^-------^ SC2039: In POSIX sh, string indexing is undefined.
>>>>                                               ^-----^ SC2039: In POSIX sh, string indexing is undefined.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> In tools/perf/tests/shell/buildid.sh line 77:
>>>>      file=${build_id_dir}/.build-id/${id:0:2}/`readlink ${link}`/elf
>>>>                                     ^-------^ SC2039: In POSIX sh, string indexing is undefined.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> In tools/perf/tests/shell/buildid.sh line 123:
>>>>      echo "running: perf record $@"
>>>>                                 ^-- SC2145: Argument mixes string and array. Use * or separate argument.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> In tools/perf/tests/shell/buildid.sh line 124:
>>>>      ${perf} record --buildid-all -o ${data} $@ &> ${log}
>>>>                                              ^-- SC2068: Double quote array expansions to avoid re-splitting elements.
>>>>                                                 ^-------^ SC2039: In POSIX sh, &> is undefined.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> In tools/perf/tests/shell/buildid.sh line 126:
>>>>              echo "failed: record $@"
>>>>                                   ^-- SC2145: Argument mixes string and array. Use * or separate argument.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> In tools/perf/tests/shell/buildid.sh line 131:
>>>>      check ${@: -1}
>>>>            ^------^ SC2068: Double quote array expansions to avoid re-splitting elements.
>>>>            ^------^ SC2039: In POSIX sh, string indexing is undefined.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> In tools/perf/tests/shell/buildid.sh line 158:
>>>> exit ${err}
>>>>   ^----^ SC2154: err is referenced but not assigned.
>>>> 
>>>> For more information:
>>>> https://www.shellcheck.net/wiki/SC2068 -- Double quote array expansions to ...
>>>> https://www.shellcheck.net/wiki/SC2145 -- Argument mixes string and array. ...
>>>> https://www.shellcheck.net/wiki/SC2039 -- In POSIX sh, &> is undefined.
>>>> 
>>>> *** After ***
>>>> 
>>>> $ shellcheck -S warning tools/perf/tests/shell/buildid.sh
>>>> 
>>>> In tools/perf/tests/shell/buildid.sh line 123:
>>>>      echo "running: perf record $@"
>>>>                                 ^-- SC2145: Argument mixes string and array. Use * or separate argument.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> In tools/perf/tests/shell/buildid.sh line 124:
>>>>      ${perf} record --buildid-all -o ${data} $@ &> ${log}
>>>>                                              ^-- SC2068: Double quote array expansions to avoid re-splitting elements.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> In tools/perf/tests/shell/buildid.sh line 126:
>>>>              echo "failed: record $@"
>>>>                                   ^-- SC2145: Argument mixes string and array. Use * or separate argument.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> In tools/perf/tests/shell/buildid.sh line 131:
>>>>      check ${@: -1}
>>>>            ^------^ SC2068: Double quote array expansions to avoid re-splitting elements.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> In tools/perf/tests/shell/buildid.sh line 158:
>>>> exit ${err}
>>>>   ^----^ SC2154: err is referenced but not assigned.
>>>> 
>>>> For more information:
>>>> https://www.shellcheck.net/wiki/SC2068 -- Double quote array expansions to ...
>>>> https://www.shellcheck.net/wiki/SC2145 -- Argument mixes string and array. ...
>>>> https://www.shellcheck.net/wiki/SC2154 -- err is referenced but not assigned.


  reply	other threads:[~2023-01-16 12:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-09-21 17:08 [PATCH 1/2] tools/perf/tests: Fix string substitutions in build id test Athira Rajeev
2022-09-21 17:08 ` [PATCH 2/2] tools/perf/tests: Fix build id test check for PE file Athira Rajeev
2022-09-22 19:15 ` [PATCH 1/2] tools/perf/tests: Fix string substitutions in build id test Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2022-09-22 23:44   ` Ian Rogers
2022-09-23  6:24   ` Adrian Hunter
2022-09-28  4:54     ` Athira Rajeev
2023-01-16  5:02       ` Athira Rajeev
2023-01-16  6:17         ` Ian Rogers
2023-01-16 11:59           ` Athira Rajeev [this message]
2023-01-16 22:00             ` Ian Rogers
2023-01-17 13:14               ` Athira Rajeev

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5CAD9B57-1788-4C7E-9658-7634A49D8BF0@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=disgoel@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=irogers@google.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=kjain@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=maddy@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=rnsastry@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).