From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A21C1C282D4 for ; Wed, 30 Jan 2019 07:18:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A6BCB21473 for ; Wed, 30 Jan 2019 07:18:11 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=c-s.fr header.i=@c-s.fr header.b="Tfsfq5MK" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org A6BCB21473 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=c-s.fr Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43qF8136lHzDqTn for ; Wed, 30 Jan 2019 18:18:09 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (mailfrom) smtp.mailfrom=c-s.fr (client-ip=93.17.236.30; helo=pegase1.c-s.fr; envelope-from=christophe.leroy@c-s.fr; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=c-s.fr Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=c-s.fr header.i=@c-s.fr header.b="Tfsfq5MK"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from pegase1.c-s.fr (pegase1.c-s.fr [93.17.236.30]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 43qF6J357qzDqS5 for ; Wed, 30 Jan 2019 18:16:40 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from localhost (mailhub1-int [192.168.12.234]) by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43qF6C6nZVz9v0mb; Wed, 30 Jan 2019 08:16:35 +0100 (CET) Authentication-Results: localhost; dkim=pass reason="1024-bit key; insecure key" header.d=c-s.fr header.i=@c-s.fr header.b=Tfsfq5MK; dkim-adsp=pass; dkim-atps=neutral X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at c-s.fr Received: from pegase1.c-s.fr ([192.168.12.234]) by localhost (pegase1.c-s.fr [192.168.12.234]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4jHKTf-MkTwy; Wed, 30 Jan 2019 08:16:35 +0100 (CET) Received: from messagerie.si.c-s.fr (messagerie.si.c-s.fr [192.168.25.192]) by pegase1.c-s.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43qF6C5gXpz9v0mW; Wed, 30 Jan 2019 08:16:35 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=c-s.fr; s=mail; t=1548832595; bh=AQG7FQEbH+iKp0Chk9MISEahdZxntoL00HHCqApOWrY=; h=To:From:Subject:Date:From; b=Tfsfq5MKNoJZj+HGkJgYjYeKW7MTk5VFIUxurVmy61dM89cYjFguF9/4Ok4MZ0zk1 nM1ZdqqGK76lG1P68PpxnHrjip+72aA3zJwaKCiVVNrbaymYifnPQBdpOYXmthEluj 2v9ktWF4ccepvnaYYtG6XfswoS/dkDAf06NDACyY= Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by messagerie.si.c-s.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF9DA8B777; Wed, 30 Jan 2019 08:16:36 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at c-s.fr Received: from messagerie.si.c-s.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (messagerie.si.c-s.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10023) with ESMTP id iPEWyaYDlEIM; Wed, 30 Jan 2019 08:16:36 +0100 (CET) Received: from PO15451 (po15451.idsi0.si.c-s.fr [172.25.231.2]) by messagerie.si.c-s.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 884A38B755; Wed, 30 Jan 2019 08:16:36 +0100 (CET) To: Paul Mackerras , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Michael Ellerman , "linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" From: Christophe Leroy Subject: Does SMP work at all on 40x ? Message-ID: <5c170dab-4f0b-8be2-e99a-9afd0fa02394@c-s.fr> Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2019 08:16:36 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: fr Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" In transfer_to_handler() (entry_32.S), we have: #if defined(CONFIG_40x) || defined(CONFIG_BOOKE) ... #ifdef CONFIG_SMP CURRENT_THREAD_INFO(r9, r1) lwz r9,TI_CPU(r9) slwi r9,r9,3 add r11,r11,r9 #endif #endif When running this piece of code, MMU translation is off. But r9 contains the virtual addr of current_thread_info, so unless I miss something, this cannot work on the 40x, can it ? On CONFIG_BOOKE it works because phys addr = virt addr Christophe