From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E0E9CA9ECB for ; Thu, 31 Oct 2019 22:03:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C5E3820862 for ; Thu, 31 Oct 2019 22:03:46 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=nvidia.com header.i=@nvidia.com header.b="ikqeCXUq" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org C5E3820862 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=nvidia.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from bilbo.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 473zqN0z2szF6G3 for ; Fri, 1 Nov 2019 09:03:44 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=nvidia.com (client-ip=216.228.121.143; helo=hqemgate14.nvidia.com; envelope-from=jhubbard@nvidia.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=nvidia.com Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=nvidia.com header.i=@nvidia.com header.b="ikqeCXUq"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from hqemgate14.nvidia.com (hqemgate14.nvidia.com [216.228.121.143]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 473zmW41rTzDqQf for ; Fri, 1 Nov 2019 09:01:14 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from hqpgpgate102.nvidia.com (Not Verified[216.228.121.13]) by hqemgate14.nvidia.com (using TLS: TLSv1.2, DES-CBC3-SHA) id ; Thu, 31 Oct 2019 15:01:14 -0700 Received: from hqmail.nvidia.com ([172.20.161.6]) by hqpgpgate102.nvidia.com (PGP Universal service); Thu, 31 Oct 2019 15:01:08 -0700 X-PGP-Universal: processed; by hqpgpgate102.nvidia.com on Thu, 31 Oct 2019 15:01:08 -0700 Received: from [10.110.48.28] (10.124.1.5) by HQMAIL107.nvidia.com (172.20.187.13) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Thu, 31 Oct 2019 22:01:07 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/19] mm/gup: factor out duplicate code from four routines To: Ira Weiny References: <20191030224930.3990755-1-jhubbard@nvidia.com> <20191030224930.3990755-3-jhubbard@nvidia.com> <20191031183549.GC14771@iweiny-DESK2.sc.intel.com> <75b557f7-24b2-740c-2640-2f914d131600@nvidia.com> <20191031210954.GE14771@iweiny-DESK2.sc.intel.com> X-Nvconfidentiality: public From: John Hubbard Message-ID: <5cb84804-be12-82e8-11d8-7e593fd05619@nvidia.com> Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2019 15:01:07 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20191031210954.GE14771@iweiny-DESK2.sc.intel.com> X-Originating-IP: [10.124.1.5] X-ClientProxiedBy: HQMAIL105.nvidia.com (172.20.187.12) To HQMAIL107.nvidia.com (172.20.187.13) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nvidia.com; s=n1; t=1572559274; bh=St3Rf/REgq/1do28NhYtGJF/+ie61nX3HJRKUe+Kv+8=; h=X-PGP-Universal:Subject:To:CC:References:X-Nvconfidentiality:From: Message-ID:Date:User-Agent:MIME-Version:In-Reply-To: X-Originating-IP:X-ClientProxiedBy:Content-Type:Content-Language: Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=ikqeCXUqsTwoQB5CbB+62UgGOxuiKLZDrBsuVMEaD9IjjDxXb09OkVp8xOPRF5wct ee5DhXFx3ncNZEuTcZeSOQivxIJokuWUNeY+2vtv3ZOkk1HWJjkj1h2EH0AXlwb+WX k+12VWYeIpYnIAMc/9Jx/3qdPSGK+huRjsgTXXwezXTbb/FzDozYDlQdAsy+QX8f3z guPaB2LcynNr/sr3xHEr7wV68E214NkgY5BRukBI2Kt+YqGU/HP5jxWqLsbWsS/eGt xEDw4hf53LcGHOIM9YJEHjAqS/wG8o7OePI2ydIId+OliMRlMyINElUiwkTZonGlbb If9KlbJQJnB+Q== X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Michal Hocko , Jan Kara , kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, David Airlie , Dave Chinner , dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, LKML , linux-mm@kvack.org, Paul Mackerras , linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, Shuah Khan , Christoph Hellwig , Jonathan Corbet , linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig , Jason Gunthorpe , Vlastimil Babka , =?UTF-8?B?QmrDtnJuIFTDtnBlbA==?= , linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, =?UTF-8?B?SsOpcsO0bWUgR2xpc3Nl?= , Al Viro , Dan Williams , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , bpf@vger.kernel.org, Magnus Karlsson , Jens Axboe , netdev@vger.kernel.org, Alex Williamson , Daniel Vetter , "Aneesh Kumar K . V" , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, "David S . Miller" , Mike Kravetz Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On 10/31/19 2:09 PM, Ira Weiny wrote: > On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 11:43:37AM -0700, John Hubbard wrote: >> On 10/31/19 11:35 AM, Ira Weiny wrote: >>> On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 03:49:13PM -0700, John Hubbard wrote: >> ... >>>> + >>>> +static int __huge_pt_done(struct page *head, int nr_recorded_pages, int *nr) >>>> +{ >>>> + *nr += nr_recorded_pages; >>>> + SetPageReferenced(head); >>>> + return 1; >>> >>> When will this return anything but 1? >>> >> >> Never, but it saves a line at all four call sites, by having it return like that. >> >> I could see how maybe people would prefer to just have it be a void function, >> and return 1 directly at the call sites. Since this was a lower line count I >> thought maybe it would be slightly better, but it's hard to say really. > > It is a NIT perhaps but I feel like the signature of a function should stand on > it's own. What this does is mix the meaning of this function with those > calling it. Which IMO is not good style. > > We can see what others say. > Sure. I'll plan on changing it to a void return type, then, unless someone else pipes up. thanks, John Hubbard NVIDIA