From: Scott Wood <oss@buserror.net>
To: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@c-s.fr>,
linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
Cc: aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc: Make PPC_64K_PAGES depend on only 44x or PPC_BOOK3S_64
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2019 00:29:17 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5e552f3d0c69890d5beb88475c8f9ba7a76bf64b.camel@buserror.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87h8czc1by.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au>
On Wed, 2019-02-20 at 01:14 +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@c-s.fr> writes:
>
> > On 02/08/2019 12:34 PM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > > In commit 7820856a4fcd ("powerpc/mm/book3e/64: Remove unsupported
> > > 64Kpage size from 64bit booke") we dropped the 64K page size support
> > > from the 64-bit nohash (Book3E) code.
> > >
> > > But we didn't update the dependencies of the PPC_64K_PAGES option,
> > > meaning a randconfig can still trigger this code and cause a build
> > > breakage, eg:
> > > arch/powerpc/include/asm/nohash/64/pgtable.h:14:2: error: #error
> > > "Page size not supported"
> > > arch/powerpc/include/asm/nohash/mmu-book3e.h:275:2: error: #error
> > > Unsupported page size
> > >
> > > So remove PPC_BOOK3E_64 from the dependencies. This also means we
> > > don't need to worry about PPC_FSL_BOOK3E, because that was just trying
> > > to prevent the PPC_BOOK3E_64=y && PPC_FSL_BOOK3E=y case.
> >
> > Does it means some cleanup could be done, for instance:
> >
> > arch/powerpc/include/asm/nohash/64/pgalloc.h:#ifndef CONFIG_PPC_64K_PAGES
> > arch/powerpc/include/asm/nohash/64/pgalloc.h:#endif /*
> > CONFIG_PPC_64K_PAGES */
> > arch/powerpc/include/asm/nohash/64/pgtable.h:#ifdef CONFIG_PPC_64K_PAGES
> > arch/powerpc/include/asm/nohash/64/slice.h:#ifdef CONFIG_PPC_64K_PAGES
> > arch/powerpc/include/asm/nohash/64/slice.h:#else /* CONFIG_PPC_64K_PAGES
> > */
> > arch/powerpc/include/asm/nohash/64/slice.h:#endif /*
> > !CONFIG_PPC_64K_PAGES */
> > arch/powerpc/include/asm/nohash/pte-book3e.h:#ifdef CONFIG_PPC_64K_PAGES
> >
> > arch/powerpc/mm/tlb_low_64e.S:#ifdef CONFIG_PPC_64K_PAGES
> > arch/powerpc/mm/tlb_low_64e.S:#ifndef CONFIG_PPC_64K_PAGES
> > arch/powerpc/mm/tlb_low_64e.S:#endif /* CONFIG_PPC_64K_PAGES */
> > arch/powerpc/mm/tlb_low_64e.S:#ifdef CONFIG_PPC_64K_PAGES
> > arch/powerpc/mm/tlb_low_64e.S:#ifdef CONFIG_PPC_64K_PAGES
> > arch/powerpc/mm/tlb_low_64e.S:#ifndef CONFIG_PPC_64K_PAGES
> > arch/powerpc/mm/tlb_low_64e.S:#endif /* CONFIG_PPC_64K_PAGES */
> > arch/powerpc/mm/tlb_low_64e.S:#ifndef CONFIG_PPC_64K_PAGES
> > arch/powerpc/mm/tlb_low_64e.S:#endif /* CONFIG_PPC_64K_PAGES */
> > arch/powerpc/mm/tlb_low_64e.S:#ifndef CONFIG_PPC_64K_PAGES
> > arch/powerpc/mm/tlb_low_64e.S:#ifdef CONFIG_PPC_64K_PAGES
>
> Probably.
>
> Some of the FSL chips do support 64K pages at least according to some
> datasheets. I don't know what would be required to get it working, or if
> it even works in practice.
>
> So it would be nice to get 64K working on those chips, but probably no
> one has time or motivation to do it. In which case yeah all that code
> should be removed.
The primary TLB (TLB0) on these chips only supports 4K pages. TLB1 supports
many different sizes but is much smaller, hardware tablewalk only loads into
TLB0, etc.
-Scott
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-02-20 6:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-02-08 12:34 [PATCH] powerpc: Make PPC_64K_PAGES depend on only 44x or PPC_BOOK3S_64 Michael Ellerman
2019-02-08 13:01 ` Christophe Leroy
2019-02-09 19:18 ` Scott Wood
2019-02-19 14:14 ` Michael Ellerman
2019-02-20 6:29 ` Scott Wood [this message]
2019-02-20 9:23 ` Michael Ellerman
2019-02-22 9:47 ` Michael Ellerman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5e552f3d0c69890d5beb88475c8f9ba7a76bf64b.camel@buserror.net \
--to=oss@buserror.net \
--cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=christophe.leroy@c-s.fr \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).