From: Nathan Fontenot <nfont@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Michael Bringmann <mwb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Cc: John Allen <jallen@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Tyrel Datwyler <tyreld@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Thomas Falcon <tlfalcon@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC v3 1/4] powerpc/hotplug/drcinfo: Fix bugs parsing ibm,drc-info structs
Date: Fri, 18 May 2018 14:57:34 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <66c02d35-2bf4-67c1-1ba0-072e9ac6562c@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5a950883-d06d-4cdc-2716-8c1ce25f394d@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On 05/17/2018 05:41 PM, Michael Bringmann wrote:
> [Replace/withdraw previous patch submission to ensure that testing
> of related patches on similar hardware progresses together.]
>
> This patch fixes a memory parsing bug when using of_prop_next_u32
> calls at the start of a structure. Depending upon the value of
> "cur" memory pointer argument to of_prop_next_u32, it will or it
> won't advance the value of the returned memory pointer by the
> size of one u32. This patch corrects the code to deal with that
> indexing feature when parsing the ibm,drc-info structs for CPUs.
> Also, need to advance the pointer at the end of_read_drc_info_cell
> for same reason.
>
I see that you provide an update for of_read_drc_info_cell to fix the
unexpected behavior you're seeing, but I'm not sure why you're updating
the code in pseries_energy.c and rpaphp_core.c? can you provide some
additional information as to why these functions also need to be updated.
> Signed-off-by: Michael Bringmann <mwb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Fixes: 3f38000eda48 ("powerpc/firmware: Add definitions for new drc-info firmware feature" -- end of patch series applied to powerpc next)
> ---
> Changes in V3:
> -- Rebased patch to 4.17-rc5 kernel
> ---
> arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/of_helpers.c | 5 ++---
> arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/pseries_energy.c | 2 ++
> drivers/pci/hotplug/rpaphp_core.c | 1 +
> 3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/of_helpers.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/of_helpers.c
> index 6df192f..20598b2 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/of_helpers.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/of_helpers.c
> @@ -65,9 +65,7 @@ int of_read_drc_info_cell(struct property **prop, const __be32 **curval,
>
> /* Get drc-index-start:encode-int */
> p2 = (const __be32 *)p;
> - p2 = of_prop_next_u32(*prop, p2, &data->drc_index_start);
> - if (!p2)
> - return -EINVAL;
> + data->drc_index_start = of_read_number(p2, 1);
This appears to resolve advancing the pointer for the beginning of a struct.
>
> /* Get drc-name-suffix-start:encode-int */
> p2 = of_prop_next_u32(*prop, p2, &data->drc_name_suffix_start);
> @@ -88,6 +86,7 @@ int of_read_drc_info_cell(struct property **prop, const __be32 **curval,
> p2 = of_prop_next_u32(*prop, p2, &data->drc_power_domain);
> if (!p2)
> return -EINVAL;
> + p2++;
...but why is the advancement needed here? of_prop_next_u32 should have advanced it, correct?
-Nathan
>
> /* Should now know end of current entry */
> (*curval) = (void *)p2;
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/pseries_energy.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/pseries_energy.c
> index 6ed2212..c7d84aa 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/pseries_energy.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/pseries_energy.c
> @@ -64,6 +64,7 @@ static u32 cpu_to_drc_index(int cpu)
> value = of_prop_next_u32(info, NULL, &num_set_entries);
> if (!value)
> goto err_of_node_put;
> + value++;
>
> for (j = 0; j < num_set_entries; j++) {
>
> @@ -126,6 +127,7 @@ static int drc_index_to_cpu(u32 drc_index)
> value = of_prop_next_u32(info, NULL, &num_set_entries);
> if (!value)
> goto err_of_node_put;
> + value++;
>
> for (j = 0; j < num_set_entries; j++) {
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/hotplug/rpaphp_core.c b/drivers/pci/hotplug/rpaphp_core.c
> index fb5e084..dccdf62 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/hotplug/rpaphp_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/hotplug/rpaphp_core.c
> @@ -239,6 +239,7 @@ static int rpaphp_check_drc_props_v2(struct device_node *dn, char *drc_name,
> value = of_prop_next_u32(info, NULL, &entries);
> if (!value)
> return -EINVAL;
> + value++;
>
> for (j = 0; j < entries; j++) {
> of_read_drc_info_cell(&info, &value, &drc);
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-05-18 19:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-05-17 22:41 [RFC v3 0/4] powerpc/drcinfo: Fix bugs 'ibm,drc-info' property Michael Bringmann
2018-05-17 22:41 ` [RFC v3 1/4] powerpc/hotplug/drcinfo: Fix bugs parsing ibm,drc-info structs Michael Bringmann
2018-05-18 19:57 ` Nathan Fontenot [this message]
2018-05-18 20:18 ` Michael Bringmann
2018-05-17 22:41 ` [RFC v3 2/4] powerpc/hotplug/drcinfo: Provide common parser for ibm,drc-info Michael Bringmann
2018-05-17 22:41 ` [RFC v3 3/4] powerpc/hotplug/drcinfo: Fix hot-add CPU issues Michael Bringmann
2018-05-17 22:41 ` [RFC v3 4/4] powerpc/hotplug/drcinfo: Improve code for ibm,drc-info device processing Michael Bringmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=66c02d35-2bf4-67c1-1ba0-072e9ac6562c@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=nfont@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=jallen@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mwb@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=tlfalcon@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=tyreld@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).