From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59FF2C32771 for ; Thu, 16 Jan 2020 02:31:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 107D6222C3 for ; Thu, 16 Jan 2020 02:31:50 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="f/mwWmJ7" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 107D6222C3 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47yp9b4hcFzDqT5 for ; Thu, 16 Jan 2020 13:31:47 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=kernel.org (client-ip=198.145.29.99; helo=mail.kernel.org; envelope-from=timur@kernel.org; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=default header.b=f/mwWmJ7; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47yp795PjCzDqH2 for ; Thu, 16 Jan 2020 13:29:40 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from [192.168.1.20] (cpe-24-28-70-126.austin.res.rr.com [24.28.70.126]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9868C222C3; Thu, 16 Jan 2020 02:29:37 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1579141778; bh=alIOUYVHdATcAf6GTLL9eHbvKsMvNUDDLbL0hXLRV5w=; h=Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=f/mwWmJ7Jjuw3huV4w4I+C3qjNOo4j0IUikg3B3hn/RG23NLdouX0Wn4MuEgzmZfj l16cxDP3iWl4awwRGNjSksi97fXw9028c0gbYK2wyuxuvotYIkPkowr+AWm6D7WksP 0byvYgAWEbijbsScnjDgtpGvSkvnhfYwia1kpnBU= Subject: Re: [PATCH] evh_bytechan: fix out of bounds accesses To: Scott Wood , Stephen Rothwell References: <20200109183912.5fcb52aa@canb.auug.org.au> <20200114072522.3cd57195@canb.auug.org.au> <6ec4bc30-0526-672c-4261-3ad2cf69dd94@kernel.org> <20200114173141.29564b25@canb.auug.org.au> <1d8f8ee6-65ac-de6c-0e0b-c9bb499c0e02@kernel.org> <20200116064234.7a139623@canb.auug.org.au> <9f3311d12d418b87832ba5de1372bb76ffccbd45.camel@redhat.com> From: Timur Tabi Message-ID: <68944006-eb89-fa6d-7373-dcf0abdbda84@kernel.org> Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2020 20:29:36 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.3.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <9f3311d12d418b87832ba5de1372bb76ffccbd45.camel@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , york sun , Jiri Slaby , PowerPC Mailing List , b08248@gmail.com Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On 1/15/20 2:01 PM, Scott Wood wrote: > FWIW I'd rather see the original patch, > that keeps the raw asm hcall stuff as simple wrappers in one place. I can live with that.