From: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
To: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 16/30] KVM: PPC: e500mc: Add doorbell emulation support
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2012 12:49:46 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6925C0C5-A8BD-4252-9B92-0612D52BBDDA@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F3ECCE6.2010503@freescale.com>
On 17.02.2012, at 22:55, Scott Wood wrote:
> On 02/17/2012 11:13 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>> When one vcpu wants to kick another, it can issue a special IPI =
instruction
>> called msgsnd. This patch emulates this instruction, its clearing =
counterpart
>> and the infrastructure required to actually trigger that interrupt =
inside
>> a guest vcpu.
>>=20
>> With this patch, SMP guests on e500mc work.
>>=20
>> Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
>> ---
>> arch/powerpc/kvm/booke.c | 6 +++
>> arch/powerpc/kvm/e500_emulate.c | 68 =
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 2 files changed, 74 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>=20
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/booke.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/booke.c
>> index 3dd200d..ce1599d 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/booke.c
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/booke.c
>> @@ -326,6 +326,9 @@ static int kvmppc_booke_irqprio_deliver(struct =
kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>> int_class =3D INT_CLASS_NONCRIT;
>> break;
>> case BOOKE_IRQPRIO_CRITICAL:
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_KVM_E500MC
>> + case BOOKE_IRQPRIO_DBELL_CRIT:
>> +#endif
>> allowed =3D vcpu->arch.shared->msr & MSR_CE;
>> allowed =3D allowed && !crit;
>> msr_mask =3D MSR_GS | MSR_ME;
>> @@ -342,6 +345,9 @@ static int kvmppc_booke_irqprio_deliver(struct =
kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>> keep_irq =3D true;
>> /* fall through */
>> case BOOKE_IRQPRIO_EXTERNAL:
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_KVM_E500MC
>> + case BOOKE_IRQPRIO_DBELL:
>> +#endif
>=20
> This isn't e500mc specific -- it's in the ISA as "Embedded.Processor
> Control".
>=20
> Any harm in just removing the ifdef (similar to tlbilx)?
Well, to me this is more of an indication "this should become a runtime =
check one day" in case we want to combine the two targets. On e500v2, we =
don't know what a doorbell interrupt is, so we really shouldn't be =
delivering one either.
>=20
>> allowed =3D vcpu->arch.shared->msr & MSR_EE;
>> allowed =3D allowed && !crit;
>> msr_mask =3D MSR_GS | MSR_CE | MSR_ME | MSR_DE;
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/e500_emulate.c =
b/arch/powerpc/kvm/e500_emulate.c
>> index 98b6c1c..29d5604 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/e500_emulate.c
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/e500_emulate.c
>> @@ -14,16 +14,74 @@
>>=20
>> #include <asm/kvm_ppc.h>
>> #include <asm/disassemble.h>
>> +#include <asm/dbell.h>
>>=20
>> #include "booke.h"
>> #include "e500.h"
>>=20
>> +#define XOP_MSGSND 206
>> +#define XOP_MSGCLR 238
>> #define XOP_TLBIVAX 786
>> #define XOP_TLBSX 914
>> #define XOP_TLBRE 946
>> #define XOP_TLBWE 978
>> #define XOP_TLBILX 18
>>=20
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_KVM_E500MC
>> +static int dbell2prio(ulong param)
>> +{
>> + int msg =3D param & PPC_DBELL_TYPE(-1);
>=20
> Maybe introduce PPC_DBELL_TYPE_MASK or GET_PPC_DBELL_TYPE?
TYPE_MASK I'd say.
>=20
>> + int prio =3D -1;
>> +
>> + switch (msg) {
>> + case PPC_DBELL_TYPE(PPC_DBELL):
>> + prio =3D BOOKE_IRQPRIO_DBELL;
>> + break;
>> + case PPC_DBELL_TYPE(PPC_DBELL_CRIT):
>> + prio =3D BOOKE_IRQPRIO_DBELL_CRIT;
>> + break;
>> + default:
>> + break;
>> + }
>> +
>> + return prio;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int kvmppc_e500_emul_msgclr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int rb)
>> +{
>> + ulong param =3D vcpu->arch.gpr[rb];
>> + int prio =3D dbell2prio(param);
>> +
>> + if (prio < 0)
>> + return EMULATE_FAIL;
>> +
>> + clear_bit(prio, &vcpu->arch.pending_exceptions);
>> + return EMULATE_DONE;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int kvmppc_e500_emul_msgsnd(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int rb)
>> +{
>> + ulong param =3D vcpu->arch.gpr[rb];
>> + int prio =3D dbell2prio(rb);
>> + int pir =3D param & 0x3fff;
>=20
> Introduce PPC_DBELL_PIR_MASK or GET_PPC_DBELL_PIR?
Good point :)
>=20
>> + int i;
>> + struct kvm_vcpu *cvcpu;
>> +
>> + if (prio < 0)
>> + return EMULATE_FAIL;
>> +
>> + kvm_for_each_vcpu(i, cvcpu, vcpu->kvm) {
>> + int cpir =3D cvcpu->arch.shared->pir;
>> + if ((param & PPC_DBELL_MSG_BRDCAST) || (cpir =3D=3D =
pir)) {
>> + set_bit(prio, &cvcpu->arch.pending_exceptions);
>> + kvm_vcpu_kick(cvcpu);
>> + }
>> + }
>=20
> Should this be a kvm_make_request instead (with a separate
> pending_doorbell bool in vcpu that msgclr can act on), considering
> earlier discussion of phasing out atomics on pending_exceptions, in
> favor of requests?
Yeah, I was thinking about that too, but right now we already have some =
direct use of pending_exceptions in different places around the code. So =
today, that is our public interface.
I'd rather go in and clean up the whole thing to make pending_exceptions =
private in a separate cleanup round, rather than having it part of =
e500mc support.
Alex
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-02-20 11:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-02-17 17:13 [PATCH 00/30] KVM: PPC: e500mc support Alexander Graf
2012-02-17 17:13 ` [PATCH 01/30] powerpc/booke: Set CPU_FTR_DEBUG_LVL_EXC on 32-bit Alexander Graf
2012-02-17 17:13 ` [PATCH 02/30] powerpc/e500: split CPU_FTRS_ALWAYS/CPU_FTRS_POSSIBLE Alexander Graf
2012-02-17 17:13 ` [PATCH 03/30] KVM: PPC: factor out lpid allocator from book3s_64_mmu_hv Alexander Graf
2012-02-17 17:13 ` [PATCH 04/30] KVM: PPC: booke: add booke-level vcpu load/put Alexander Graf
2012-02-17 17:13 ` [PATCH 05/30] KVM: PPC: booke: Move vm core init/destroy out of booke.c Alexander Graf
2012-02-17 17:13 ` [PATCH 06/30] KVM: PPC: e500: rename e500_tlb.h to e500.h Alexander Graf
2012-02-17 17:13 ` [PATCH 07/30] KVM: PPC: e500: merge <asm/kvm_e500.h> into arch/powerpc/kvm/e500.h Alexander Graf
2012-02-17 17:13 ` [PATCH 08/30] KVM: PPC: e500: clean up arch/powerpc/kvm/e500.h Alexander Graf
2012-02-17 17:13 ` [PATCH 09/30] KVM: PPC: e500: refactor core-specific TLB code Alexander Graf
2012-02-17 17:13 ` [PATCH 10/30] KVM: PPC: e500: Track TLB1 entries with a bitmap Alexander Graf
2012-02-17 17:13 ` [PATCH 11/30] KVM: PPC: e500: emulate tlbilx Alexander Graf
2012-02-17 17:13 ` [PATCH 12/30] powerpc/booke: Provide exception macros with interrupt name Alexander Graf
2012-02-17 17:13 ` [PATCH 13/30] KVM: PPC: booke: category E.HV (GS-mode) support Alexander Graf
2012-02-17 21:12 ` Scott Wood
2012-02-20 11:40 ` Alexander Graf
2012-02-17 17:13 ` [PATCH 14/30] KVM: PPC: booke: standard PPC floating point support Alexander Graf
2012-02-17 17:13 ` [PATCH 15/30] KVM: PPC: e500mc support Alexander Graf
2012-02-17 17:13 ` [PATCH 16/30] KVM: PPC: e500mc: Add doorbell emulation support Alexander Graf
2012-02-17 21:55 ` Scott Wood
2012-02-17 21:57 ` Scott Wood
2012-02-20 11:49 ` Alexander Graf [this message]
2012-02-20 15:39 ` Scott Wood
2012-02-20 15:42 ` Alexander Graf
2012-02-17 17:13 ` [PATCH 17/30] KVM: PPC: e500mc: implicitly set MSR_GS Alexander Graf
2012-02-17 17:13 ` [PATCH 18/30] KVM: PPC: e500mc: Move r1/r2 restoration very early Alexander Graf
2012-02-17 17:13 ` [PATCH 19/30] KVM: PPC: e500mc: add load inst fixup Alexander Graf
2012-02-17 23:17 ` Scott Wood
2012-02-17 17:13 ` [PATCH 20/30] KVM: PPC: rename CONFIG_KVM_E500 -> CONFIG_KVM_E500V2 Alexander Graf
2012-02-17 17:13 ` [PATCH 21/30] KVM: PPC: make e500v2 and e500mc mutually exclusive Alexander Graf
2012-02-17 22:13 ` Scott Wood
2012-02-17 17:13 ` [PATCH 22/30] KVM: PPC: booke: remove leftover debugging Alexander Graf
2012-02-17 17:13 ` [PATCH 23/30] KVM: PPC: booke: deliver program int on emulation failure Alexander Graf
2012-02-17 17:13 ` [PATCH 24/30] KVM: PPC: booke: call resched after every exit Alexander Graf
2012-02-17 23:00 ` Scott Wood
2012-02-20 13:17 ` Alexander Graf
2012-02-20 17:18 ` Scott Wood
2012-02-17 17:13 ` [PATCH 25/30] KVM: PPC: booke: BOOKE_IRQPRIO_MAX is n+1 Alexander Graf
2012-02-17 17:13 ` [PATCH 26/30] KVM: PPC: bookehv: fix exit timing Alexander Graf
2012-02-17 17:13 ` [PATCH 27/30] KVM: PPC: bookehv: remove negation for CONFIG_64BIT Alexander Graf
2012-02-17 17:13 ` [PATCH 28/30] KVM: PPC: bookehv: remove SET_VCPU Alexander Graf
2012-02-17 17:13 ` [PATCH 29/30] KVM: PPC: bookehv: disable MAS register updates early Alexander Graf
2012-02-17 17:13 ` [PATCH 30/30] KVM: PPC: bookehv: add comment about shadow_msr Alexander Graf
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-02-17 16:56 [PATCH 00/30] KVM: PPC: e500mc support Alexander Graf
2012-02-17 16:56 ` [PATCH 16/30] KVM: PPC: e500mc: Add doorbell emulation support Alexander Graf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6925C0C5-A8BD-4252-9B92-0612D52BBDDA@suse.de \
--to=agraf@suse.de \
--cc=kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=scottwood@freescale.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).