From: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com> To: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>, Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>, "linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org> Subject: Re: Fwd: [Bug 213069] New: kernel BUG at arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/hash-4k.h:147! Oops: Exception in kernel mode, sig: 5 [#1] Date: Mon, 17 May 2021 18:19:17 +0530 [thread overview] Message-ID: <6fcdf4f2-9bed-4b0f-8ed8-74cb25484ea6@arm.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <e9558e0a-314e-ddfd-6776-84c1bfe6f01f@linux.ibm.com> On 5/17/21 11:25 AM, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote: > On 5/17/21 11:17 AM, Christophe Leroy wrote: >> +aneesh >> +linuxppc-dev list >> >> Le 17/05/2021 à 07:44, Anshuman Khandual a écrit : >>> Hello Christophe, >>> >>> DEBUG_VM_PGTABLE has now been re-enabled on powerpc recently ? was not >>> aware about this. From the error log, it failed explicitly on 4K page >>> size hash config. >>> >>> static inline pmd_t hash__pmd_mkhuge(pmd_t pmd) >>> { >>> BUG(); ------> Failed >>> return pmd; >>> } >>> >>> static inline pmd_t __pmd_mkhuge(pmd_t pmd) >>> { >>> if (radix_enabled()) >>> return radix__pmd_mkhuge(pmd); >>> return hash__pmd_mkhuge(pmd); >>> } >>> >>> pmd_t pfn_pmd(unsigned long pfn, pgprot_t pgprot) >>> { >>> unsigned long pmdv; >>> >>> pmdv = (pfn << PAGE_SHIFT) & PTE_RPN_MASK; >>> >>> return __pmd_mkhuge(pmd_set_protbits(__pmd(pmdv), pgprot)); >>> } >>> >>> It seems like on powerpc, where pfn_pmd() makes a huge page but which >>> is not supported on 4K hash config thus triggering the BUG(). But all >>> pfn_pmd() call sites inside the debug_vm_pgtable() test are protected >>> with CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE. IIUC unlike powerpc, pfn_pmd() does >>> not directly make a huge page on other platforms. >>> >>> Looking at arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/hash-4k.h, all relevant >>> THP helpers has BUG() or 0 which indicates THP might not be supported >>> on 4K page size hash config ? >>> >>> But looking at arch/powerpc/platforms/Kconfig.cputype, it seems like >>> HAVE_ARCH_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE is invariably selected on PPC_BOOK3S_64 >>> platforms which I assume includes 4K page size hash config as well. >>> >>> Is THP some how getting enabled on this 4K page size hash config where >>> it should not be (thus triggering the BUG) ? OR am I missing something >>> here. >>> >> > > We should put those pfn_pmd() and pfn_pud() after > > if (!has_transparent_hugepage()) > return; The following patch has been lightly tested on arm64 and x86 platforms. Could you please verify if this solves the problem on powerpc 4K hash config ? Thank you. - Anshuman mm/debug_vm_pgtable.c | 58 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 48 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/mm/debug_vm_pgtable.c b/mm/debug_vm_pgtable.c index e2f35db8ba69..6ff92c8b0a00 100644 --- a/mm/debug_vm_pgtable.c +++ b/mm/debug_vm_pgtable.c @@ -146,13 +146,14 @@ static void __init pte_savedwrite_tests(unsigned long pfn, pgprot_t prot) static void __init pmd_basic_tests(unsigned long pfn, int idx) { pgprot_t prot = protection_map[idx]; - pmd_t pmd = pfn_pmd(pfn, prot); unsigned long val = idx, *ptr = &val; + pmd_t pmd; if (!has_transparent_hugepage()) return; pr_debug("Validating PMD basic (%pGv)\n", ptr); + pmd = pfn_pmd(pfn, prot); /* * This test needs to be executed after the given page table entry @@ -232,9 +233,14 @@ static void __init pmd_advanced_tests(struct mm_struct *mm, static void __init pmd_leaf_tests(unsigned long pfn, pgprot_t prot) { - pmd_t pmd = pfn_pmd(pfn, prot); + pmd_t pmd; + + if (!has_transparent_hugepage()) + return; pr_debug("Validating PMD leaf\n"); + pmd = pfn_pmd(pfn, prot); + /* * PMD based THP is a leaf entry. */ @@ -244,12 +250,16 @@ static void __init pmd_leaf_tests(unsigned long pfn, pgprot_t prot) static void __init pmd_savedwrite_tests(unsigned long pfn, pgprot_t prot) { - pmd_t pmd = pfn_pmd(pfn, prot); + pmd_t pmd; if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING)) return; + if (!has_transparent_hugepage()) + return; + pr_debug("Validating PMD saved write\n"); + pmd = pfn_pmd(pfn, prot); WARN_ON(!pmd_savedwrite(pmd_mk_savedwrite(pmd_clear_savedwrite(pmd)))); WARN_ON(pmd_savedwrite(pmd_clear_savedwrite(pmd_mk_savedwrite(pmd)))); } @@ -258,13 +268,14 @@ static void __init pmd_savedwrite_tests(unsigned long pfn, pgprot_t prot) static void __init pud_basic_tests(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long pfn, int idx) { pgprot_t prot = protection_map[idx]; - pud_t pud = pfn_pud(pfn, prot); unsigned long val = idx, *ptr = &val; + pud_t pud; if (!has_transparent_hugepage()) return; pr_debug("Validating PUD basic (%pGv)\n", ptr); + pud = pfn_pud(pfn, prot); /* * This test needs to be executed after the given page table entry @@ -348,9 +359,13 @@ static void __init pud_advanced_tests(struct mm_struct *mm, static void __init pud_leaf_tests(unsigned long pfn, pgprot_t prot) { - pud_t pud = pfn_pud(pfn, prot); + pud_t pud; + + if (!has_transparent_hugepage()) + return; pr_debug("Validating PUD leaf\n"); + pud = pfn_pud(pfn, prot); /* * PUD based THP is a leaf entry. */ @@ -642,12 +657,16 @@ static void __init pte_protnone_tests(unsigned long pfn, pgprot_t prot) #ifdef CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE static void __init pmd_protnone_tests(unsigned long pfn, pgprot_t prot) { - pmd_t pmd = pmd_mkhuge(pfn_pmd(pfn, prot)); + pmd_t pmd; if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING)) return; + if (!has_transparent_hugepage()) + return; + pr_debug("Validating PMD protnone\n"); + pmd = pmd_mkhuge(pfn_pmd(pfn, prot)); WARN_ON(!pmd_protnone(pmd)); WARN_ON(!pmd_present(pmd)); } @@ -667,18 +686,26 @@ static void __init pte_devmap_tests(unsigned long pfn, pgprot_t prot) #ifdef CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE static void __init pmd_devmap_tests(unsigned long pfn, pgprot_t prot) { - pmd_t pmd = pfn_pmd(pfn, prot); + pmd_t pmd; + + if (!has_transparent_hugepage()) + return; pr_debug("Validating PMD devmap\n"); + pmd = pfn_pmd(pfn, prot); WARN_ON(!pmd_devmap(pmd_mkdevmap(pmd))); } #ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE_PUD static void __init pud_devmap_tests(unsigned long pfn, pgprot_t prot) { - pud_t pud = pfn_pud(pfn, prot); + pud_t pud; + + if (!has_transparent_hugepage()) + return; pr_debug("Validating PUD devmap\n"); + pud = pfn_pud(pfn, prot); WARN_ON(!pud_devmap(pud_mkdevmap(pud))); } #else /* !CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE_PUD */ @@ -721,25 +748,33 @@ static void __init pte_swap_soft_dirty_tests(unsigned long pfn, pgprot_t prot) #ifdef CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE static void __init pmd_soft_dirty_tests(unsigned long pfn, pgprot_t prot) { - pmd_t pmd = pfn_pmd(pfn, prot); + pmd_t pmd; if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MEM_SOFT_DIRTY)) return; + if (!has_transparent_hugepage()) + return; + pr_debug("Validating PMD soft dirty\n"); + pmd = pfn_pmd(pfn, prot); WARN_ON(!pmd_soft_dirty(pmd_mksoft_dirty(pmd))); WARN_ON(pmd_soft_dirty(pmd_clear_soft_dirty(pmd))); } static void __init pmd_swap_soft_dirty_tests(unsigned long pfn, pgprot_t prot) { - pmd_t pmd = pfn_pmd(pfn, prot); + pmd_t pmd; if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MEM_SOFT_DIRTY) || !IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARCH_ENABLE_THP_MIGRATION)) return; + if (!has_transparent_hugepage()) + return; + pr_debug("Validating PMD swap soft dirty\n"); + pmd = pfn_pmd(pfn, prot); WARN_ON(!pmd_swp_soft_dirty(pmd_swp_mksoft_dirty(pmd))); WARN_ON(pmd_swp_soft_dirty(pmd_swp_clear_soft_dirty(pmd))); } @@ -768,6 +803,9 @@ static void __init pmd_swap_tests(unsigned long pfn, pgprot_t prot) swp_entry_t swp; pmd_t pmd; + if (!has_transparent_hugepage()) + return; + pr_debug("Validating PMD swap\n"); pmd = pfn_pmd(pfn, prot); swp = __pmd_to_swp_entry(pmd); -- 2.20.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-05-17 12:51 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2021-05-14 23:44 bugzilla-daemon 2021-05-15 10:20 ` [Bug 213069] " bugzilla-daemon [not found] ` <4deb5cd5-c713-b020-9143-c74a031e3fd5@csgroup.eu> [not found] ` <a8841b4e-3bff-f600-eac7-501f78ced54b@arm.com> 2021-05-17 5:47 ` Fwd: [Bug 213069] New: " Christophe Leroy 2021-05-17 5:55 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V 2021-05-17 7:25 ` Anshuman Khandual 2021-05-17 7:44 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V 2021-05-17 10:53 ` Anshuman Khandual 2021-05-17 11:14 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V 2021-05-17 12:49 ` Anshuman Khandual [this message] 2021-05-17 12:59 ` Christophe Leroy 2021-05-17 13:12 ` Anshuman Khandual 2021-05-17 15:26 ` Christophe Leroy 2021-05-17 13:52 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V 2021-05-17 14:12 ` Anshuman Khandual 2021-05-17 6:21 ` [Bug 213069] " bugzilla-daemon 2021-05-17 10:36 ` bugzilla-daemon 2021-05-17 12:57 ` bugzilla-daemon 2021-05-19 1:56 ` bugzilla-daemon 2021-06-04 0:36 ` bugzilla-daemon 2021-06-18 23:18 ` bugzilla-daemon
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=6fcdf4f2-9bed-4b0f-8ed8-74cb25484ea6@arm.com \ --to=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \ --cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com \ --cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \ --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \ --subject='Re: Fwd: [Bug 213069] New: kernel BUG at arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/hash-4k.h:147'\!' Oops: Exception in kernel mode, sig: 5 [#1]' \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).