From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20DDEC0650F for ; Thu, 8 Aug 2019 08:22:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7ECAD21880 for ; Thu, 8 Aug 2019 08:22:40 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 7ECAD21880 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from bilbo.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4641Zj4Nq9zDqNB for ; Thu, 8 Aug 2019 18:22:37 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (mailfrom) smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com (client-ip=45.249.212.191; helo=huawei.com; envelope-from=yanaijie@huawei.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Received: from huawei.com (szxga05-in.huawei.com [45.249.212.191]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4641Wn45lqzDqMG for ; Thu, 8 Aug 2019 18:20:05 +1000 (AEST) Received: from DGGEMS410-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.60]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 11ECB394B576ED660B8E; Thu, 8 Aug 2019 16:20:00 +0800 (CST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (10.177.96.203) by DGGEMS410-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.210) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.439.0; Thu, 8 Aug 2019 16:19:50 +0800 Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 09/10] powerpc/fsl_booke/kaslr: support nokaslr cmdline parameter To: Michael Ellerman , , , , , , , , References: <20190807065706.11411-1-yanaijie@huawei.com> <20190807065706.11411-10-yanaijie@huawei.com> <87y305t9dv.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au> From: Jason Yan Message-ID: <7218f89b-8724-55f3-e834-5dc4722fdb8f@huawei.com> Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2019 16:19:48 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <87y305t9dv.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.177.96.203] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jingxiangfeng@huawei.com, zhaohongjiang@huawei.com, thunder.leizhen@huawei.com, fanchengyang@huawei.com, yebin10@huawei.com Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On 2019/8/7 21:03, Michael Ellerman wrote: > Jason Yan writes: >> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/kaslr_booke.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/kaslr_booke.c >> index c6b326424b54..436f9a03f385 100644 >> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/kaslr_booke.c >> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/kaslr_booke.c >> @@ -361,6 +361,18 @@ static unsigned long __init kaslr_choose_location(void *dt_ptr, phys_addr_t size >> return kaslr_offset; >> } >> >> +static inline __init bool kaslr_disabled(void) >> +{ >> + char *str; >> + >> + str = strstr(boot_command_line, "nokaslr"); >> + if (str == boot_command_line || >> + (str > boot_command_line && *(str - 1) == ' ')) >> + return true; > > This extra logic doesn't work for "nokaslrfoo". Is it worth it? > Seems nobody likes this logic. Maybe I can delete this logic for now and see if anyone has any objections. > cheers > > . >