linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Laurent Dufour <ldufour@linux.ibm.com>
To: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>,
	mpe@ellerman.id.au, benh@kernel.crashing.org, paulus@samba.org,
	npiggin@gmail.com
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] powperc/mm: read TLB Block Invalidate Characteristics
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2019 11:10:34 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <76cd8c5e-0a7f-1aa0-0004-c7a874085ce1@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <97bafb53-6ae9-1d42-1816-ef81b845b80c@linux.ibm.com>

Le 13/09/2019 à 04:00, Aneesh Kumar K.V a écrit :
> On 9/13/19 12:56 AM, Laurent Dufour wrote:
>> Le 12/09/2019 à 16:44, Aneesh Kumar K.V a écrit :
>>> Laurent Dufour <ldufour@linux.ibm.com> writes:
> 
>>>> +
>>>> +    idx = 2;
>>>> +    while (idx < len) {
>>>> +        unsigned int block_size = local_buffer[idx++];
>>>> +        unsigned int npsize;
>>>> +
>>>> +        if (!block_size)
>>>> +            break;
>>>> +
>>>> +        block_size = 1 << block_size;
>>>> +        if (block_size != 8)
>>>> +            /* We only support 8 bytes size TLB invalidate buffer */
>>>> +            pr_warn("Unsupported H_BLOCK_REMOVE block size : %d\n",
>>>> +                block_size);
>>>
>>> Should we skip setting block size if we find block_size != 8? Also can
>>> we avoid doing that pr_warn in loop and only warn if we don't find
>>> block_size 8 in the invalidate characteristics array?
>>
>> My idea here is to fully read and process the data returned by the hcall, 
>> and to put the limitation to 8 when checking before calling H_BLOCK_REMOVE.
>> The warning is there because I want it to be displayed once at boot.
>>
> 
> 
> Can we have two block size reported for the same base page size/actual page 
> size combination? If so we will overwrite the hblk[actual_psize] ?

In check_lp_set_hblk() I'm only keeping the bigger one.

> 
>>>
>>>> +
>>>> +        for (npsize = local_buffer[idx++];  npsize > 0; npsize--)
>>>> +            check_lp_set_hblk((unsigned int) local_buffer[idx++],
>>>> +                      block_size);
>>>> +    }
>>>> +
>>>> +    for (bpsize = 0; bpsize < MMU_PAGE_COUNT; bpsize++)
>>>> +        for (idx = 0; idx < MMU_PAGE_COUNT; idx++)
>>>> +            if (mmu_psize_defs[bpsize].hblk[idx])
>>>> +                pr_info("H_BLOCK_REMOVE supports base psize:%d 
>>>> psize:%d block size:%d",
>>>> +                    bpsize, idx,
>>>> +                    mmu_psize_defs[bpsize].hblk[idx]);
>>>> +
>>>> +    return 0;
>>>> +}
>>>> +machine_arch_initcall(pseries, read_tlbbi_characteristics);
>>>> +
>>>>   /*
>>>>    * Take a spinlock around flushes to avoid bouncing the hypervisor tlbie
>>>>    * lock.
> 
> -aneesh


  reply	other threads:[~2019-09-13  9:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-08-30 12:07 [PATCH 0/3] powerpc/mm: Conditionally call H_BLOCK_REMOVE Laurent Dufour
2019-08-30 12:07 ` [PATCH 1/3] powerpc/mm: Initialize the HPTE encoding values Laurent Dufour
2019-09-12 13:32   ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2019-09-12 13:37   ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2019-09-13 10:56     ` Laurent Dufour
2019-08-30 12:07 ` [PATCH 2/3] powperc/mm: read TLB Block Invalidate Characteristics Laurent Dufour
2019-09-12 14:16   ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2019-09-13 13:55     ` Laurent Dufour
2019-09-12 14:44   ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2019-09-12 19:26     ` Laurent Dufour
2019-09-13  2:00       ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2019-09-13  9:10         ` Laurent Dufour [this message]
2019-08-30 12:07 ` [PATCH 3/3] powerpc/mm: call H_BLOCK_REMOVE when supported Laurent Dufour
2019-09-12 14:20   ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2019-09-13 13:16     ` Laurent Dufour
2019-09-12 13:44 ` [PATCH 0/3] powerpc/mm: Conditionally call H_BLOCK_REMOVE Aneesh Kumar K.V
2019-09-13 11:09   ` Laurent Dufour

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=76cd8c5e-0a7f-1aa0-0004-c7a874085ce1@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=ldufour@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).